Cargando…

Evaluating HIV Viral Rebound Among Persons on Suppressive Antiretroviral Treatment in the Era of “Undetectable Equals Untransmittable (U = U)”

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that persons with HIV (PWH) maintaining viral suppression do not transmit HIV to HIV-negative partners through condomless sex, leading to the “Undetectable = Untransmittable (U = U)” prevention campaign. However, few studies have examined the durability of suppr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Min, Sugi, Gillani, Fizza S, Aung, Su, Garland, Joseph M, Beckwith, Curt G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33335935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa529
_version_ 1783621916799533056
author Min, Sugi
Gillani, Fizza S
Aung, Su
Garland, Joseph M
Beckwith, Curt G
author_facet Min, Sugi
Gillani, Fizza S
Aung, Su
Garland, Joseph M
Beckwith, Curt G
author_sort Min, Sugi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that persons with HIV (PWH) maintaining viral suppression do not transmit HIV to HIV-negative partners through condomless sex, leading to the “Undetectable = Untransmittable (U = U)” prevention campaign. However, few studies have examined the durability of suppression in the era of U = U. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in Providence, Rhode Island. PWH aged ≥18 years with documented viral suppression (defined as at least 1 viral load [VL] <200 copies/mL and no VL ≥200 copies/mL) in 2015 were included in the baseline cohort. Primary outcomes were viral suppression, viral rebound (at least 1 VL ≥200 copies/mL), or gap in VL monitoring assessed annually from 2016 to 2019. Those with viral rebound were assessed for resuppression within 6 months. Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with viral rebound or gaps in VL monitoring were investigated by bivariate analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1242 patients with viral suppression were included in the baseline cohort. In each follow-up year, 85%–90% maintained viral suppression, 2%–5% experienced viral rebound, and 8%–10% had a gap in VL monitoring. Among those with viral rebound, approximately one-half were suppressed again within 6 months. In the logistic regression models, retention in care was significantly associated with viral suppression, while younger age, black race, high school or equivalent education, non–men who have sex with men, and history of incarceration were significantly associated with viral rebound. CONCLUSIONS: In the U = U era, most patients with viral suppression who are retained in care are likely to maintain viral suppression over time. Some patients require additional support for regular VL monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7731526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77315262020-12-16 Evaluating HIV Viral Rebound Among Persons on Suppressive Antiretroviral Treatment in the Era of “Undetectable Equals Untransmittable (U = U)” Min, Sugi Gillani, Fizza S Aung, Su Garland, Joseph M Beckwith, Curt G Open Forum Infect Dis Major Articles BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that persons with HIV (PWH) maintaining viral suppression do not transmit HIV to HIV-negative partners through condomless sex, leading to the “Undetectable = Untransmittable (U = U)” prevention campaign. However, few studies have examined the durability of suppression in the era of U = U. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in Providence, Rhode Island. PWH aged ≥18 years with documented viral suppression (defined as at least 1 viral load [VL] <200 copies/mL and no VL ≥200 copies/mL) in 2015 were included in the baseline cohort. Primary outcomes were viral suppression, viral rebound (at least 1 VL ≥200 copies/mL), or gap in VL monitoring assessed annually from 2016 to 2019. Those with viral rebound were assessed for resuppression within 6 months. Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with viral rebound or gaps in VL monitoring were investigated by bivariate analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1242 patients with viral suppression were included in the baseline cohort. In each follow-up year, 85%–90% maintained viral suppression, 2%–5% experienced viral rebound, and 8%–10% had a gap in VL monitoring. Among those with viral rebound, approximately one-half were suppressed again within 6 months. In the logistic regression models, retention in care was significantly associated with viral suppression, while younger age, black race, high school or equivalent education, non–men who have sex with men, and history of incarceration were significantly associated with viral rebound. CONCLUSIONS: In the U = U era, most patients with viral suppression who are retained in care are likely to maintain viral suppression over time. Some patients require additional support for regular VL monitoring. Oxford University Press 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7731526/ /pubmed/33335935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa529 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Articles
Min, Sugi
Gillani, Fizza S
Aung, Su
Garland, Joseph M
Beckwith, Curt G
Evaluating HIV Viral Rebound Among Persons on Suppressive Antiretroviral Treatment in the Era of “Undetectable Equals Untransmittable (U = U)”
title Evaluating HIV Viral Rebound Among Persons on Suppressive Antiretroviral Treatment in the Era of “Undetectable Equals Untransmittable (U = U)”
title_full Evaluating HIV Viral Rebound Among Persons on Suppressive Antiretroviral Treatment in the Era of “Undetectable Equals Untransmittable (U = U)”
title_fullStr Evaluating HIV Viral Rebound Among Persons on Suppressive Antiretroviral Treatment in the Era of “Undetectable Equals Untransmittable (U = U)”
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating HIV Viral Rebound Among Persons on Suppressive Antiretroviral Treatment in the Era of “Undetectable Equals Untransmittable (U = U)”
title_short Evaluating HIV Viral Rebound Among Persons on Suppressive Antiretroviral Treatment in the Era of “Undetectable Equals Untransmittable (U = U)”
title_sort evaluating hiv viral rebound among persons on suppressive antiretroviral treatment in the era of “undetectable equals untransmittable (u = u)”
topic Major Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33335935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa529
work_keys_str_mv AT minsugi evaluatinghivviralreboundamongpersonsonsuppressiveantiretroviraltreatmentintheeraofundetectableequalsuntransmittableuu
AT gillanifizzas evaluatinghivviralreboundamongpersonsonsuppressiveantiretroviraltreatmentintheeraofundetectableequalsuntransmittableuu
AT aungsu evaluatinghivviralreboundamongpersonsonsuppressiveantiretroviraltreatmentintheeraofundetectableequalsuntransmittableuu
AT garlandjosephm evaluatinghivviralreboundamongpersonsonsuppressiveantiretroviraltreatmentintheeraofundetectableequalsuntransmittableuu
AT beckwithcurtg evaluatinghivviralreboundamongpersonsonsuppressiveantiretroviraltreatmentintheeraofundetectableequalsuntransmittableuu