Cargando…
A systematic scoping review of the habitual dietary costs in low socioeconomic groups compared to high socioeconomic groups in Australia
BACKGROUND: Low socioeconomic groups (SEGs) in Australia are less likely to consume diets consistent with the Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADGs) and suffer poorer health than the broader population. The unaffordability, or perceived high cost, of healthy diets may be a factor. Detailed data on the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-020-00654-5 |
_version_ | 1783621935777710080 |
---|---|
author | Lewis, Meron McNaughton, Sarah A. Rychetnik, Lucie Lee, Amanda J. |
author_facet | Lewis, Meron McNaughton, Sarah A. Rychetnik, Lucie Lee, Amanda J. |
author_sort | Lewis, Meron |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Low socioeconomic groups (SEGs) in Australia are less likely to consume diets consistent with the Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADGs) and suffer poorer health than the broader population. The unaffordability, or perceived high cost, of healthy diets may be a factor. Detailed data on the cost of habitually consumed diets is required in order to inform strategies to alleviate socioeconomic impacts on dietary intake. This systematic scoping review aims to identify the cost of the habitual dietary intake of low SEGs in Australia, in terms of the whole diet and its composite foods, in comparison to the cost in higher SEGs. METHODS: A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature since 2000 and key government and non-government organisation (NGO) websites was undertaken. Data were extracted, synthesised and analysed in relation to study populations, dietary cost assessment measures, socioeconomic measures, and dietary cost and affordability. RESULTS: The review identified four studies meeting inclusion criteria. Results confirmed that overall, low SEGs spend a lower amount, yet a higher proportion of household income, on food and drinks than higher SEGs. Quantitative comparison of the dietary costs between included studies was not possible due to difference in populations and study metrics. Costs of the habitual diet in these studies were not reported for ADG food groups, so did not allow for assessment of the healthfulness of the dietary intake or comparison with costs of recommended diets at food group level. CONCLUSIONS: Existing research does not provide sufficiently granular data of the costs of habitual diets of low SEGs in comparison to higher SEGs or data in a form that can inform strategies and interventions to improve dietary intake and diet-related health of low SEGs in Australia. Future empirical health research requires more granular measures of habitual spending on ADG food groups across SEGs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7731625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77316252020-12-15 A systematic scoping review of the habitual dietary costs in low socioeconomic groups compared to high socioeconomic groups in Australia Lewis, Meron McNaughton, Sarah A. Rychetnik, Lucie Lee, Amanda J. Nutr J Review BACKGROUND: Low socioeconomic groups (SEGs) in Australia are less likely to consume diets consistent with the Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADGs) and suffer poorer health than the broader population. The unaffordability, or perceived high cost, of healthy diets may be a factor. Detailed data on the cost of habitually consumed diets is required in order to inform strategies to alleviate socioeconomic impacts on dietary intake. This systematic scoping review aims to identify the cost of the habitual dietary intake of low SEGs in Australia, in terms of the whole diet and its composite foods, in comparison to the cost in higher SEGs. METHODS: A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature since 2000 and key government and non-government organisation (NGO) websites was undertaken. Data were extracted, synthesised and analysed in relation to study populations, dietary cost assessment measures, socioeconomic measures, and dietary cost and affordability. RESULTS: The review identified four studies meeting inclusion criteria. Results confirmed that overall, low SEGs spend a lower amount, yet a higher proportion of household income, on food and drinks than higher SEGs. Quantitative comparison of the dietary costs between included studies was not possible due to difference in populations and study metrics. Costs of the habitual diet in these studies were not reported for ADG food groups, so did not allow for assessment of the healthfulness of the dietary intake or comparison with costs of recommended diets at food group level. CONCLUSIONS: Existing research does not provide sufficiently granular data of the costs of habitual diets of low SEGs in comparison to higher SEGs or data in a form that can inform strategies and interventions to improve dietary intake and diet-related health of low SEGs in Australia. Future empirical health research requires more granular measures of habitual spending on ADG food groups across SEGs. BioMed Central 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7731625/ /pubmed/33302963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-020-00654-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Lewis, Meron McNaughton, Sarah A. Rychetnik, Lucie Lee, Amanda J. A systematic scoping review of the habitual dietary costs in low socioeconomic groups compared to high socioeconomic groups in Australia |
title | A systematic scoping review of the habitual dietary costs in low socioeconomic groups compared to high socioeconomic groups in Australia |
title_full | A systematic scoping review of the habitual dietary costs in low socioeconomic groups compared to high socioeconomic groups in Australia |
title_fullStr | A systematic scoping review of the habitual dietary costs in low socioeconomic groups compared to high socioeconomic groups in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic scoping review of the habitual dietary costs in low socioeconomic groups compared to high socioeconomic groups in Australia |
title_short | A systematic scoping review of the habitual dietary costs in low socioeconomic groups compared to high socioeconomic groups in Australia |
title_sort | systematic scoping review of the habitual dietary costs in low socioeconomic groups compared to high socioeconomic groups in australia |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-020-00654-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lewismeron asystematicscopingreviewofthehabitualdietarycostsinlowsocioeconomicgroupscomparedtohighsocioeconomicgroupsinaustralia AT mcnaughtonsaraha asystematicscopingreviewofthehabitualdietarycostsinlowsocioeconomicgroupscomparedtohighsocioeconomicgroupsinaustralia AT rychetniklucie asystematicscopingreviewofthehabitualdietarycostsinlowsocioeconomicgroupscomparedtohighsocioeconomicgroupsinaustralia AT leeamandaj asystematicscopingreviewofthehabitualdietarycostsinlowsocioeconomicgroupscomparedtohighsocioeconomicgroupsinaustralia AT lewismeron systematicscopingreviewofthehabitualdietarycostsinlowsocioeconomicgroupscomparedtohighsocioeconomicgroupsinaustralia AT mcnaughtonsaraha systematicscopingreviewofthehabitualdietarycostsinlowsocioeconomicgroupscomparedtohighsocioeconomicgroupsinaustralia AT rychetniklucie systematicscopingreviewofthehabitualdietarycostsinlowsocioeconomicgroupscomparedtohighsocioeconomicgroupsinaustralia AT leeamandaj systematicscopingreviewofthehabitualdietarycostsinlowsocioeconomicgroupscomparedtohighsocioeconomicgroupsinaustralia |