Cargando…
Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia
The use of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) design to evaluate the effectiveness of new interventions in aphasia has increased in recent years in response to calls for high quality evidence of the effectiveness of interventions for this population. This view-point article highlights some of the...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343126 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aian.AIAN_453_20 |
_version_ | 1783621947002716160 |
---|---|
author | Palmer, Rebecca |
author_facet | Palmer, Rebecca |
author_sort | Palmer, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) design to evaluate the effectiveness of new interventions in aphasia has increased in recent years in response to calls for high quality evidence of the effectiveness of interventions for this population. This view-point article highlights some of the important considerations when designing a trial for an aphasia intervention, illustrated with decisions made when designing the Big CACTUS RCT for self-managed computer-based word finding therapy in aphasia. Considerations outlined include whether an RCT is needed, readiness for conducting an RCT, choice of comparators, randomisation options, blinding/masking, selection of outcome measures, pragmatic versus explanatory approaches, and fidelity measurement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7731679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77316792020-12-18 Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia Palmer, Rebecca Ann Indian Acad Neurol View Point The use of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) design to evaluate the effectiveness of new interventions in aphasia has increased in recent years in response to calls for high quality evidence of the effectiveness of interventions for this population. This view-point article highlights some of the important considerations when designing a trial for an aphasia intervention, illustrated with decisions made when designing the Big CACTUS RCT for self-managed computer-based word finding therapy in aphasia. Considerations outlined include whether an RCT is needed, readiness for conducting an RCT, choice of comparators, randomisation options, blinding/masking, selection of outcome measures, pragmatic versus explanatory approaches, and fidelity measurement. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-09 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7731679/ /pubmed/33343126 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aian.AIAN_453_20 Text en Copyright: © 2006 - 2020 Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | View Point Palmer, Rebecca Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia |
title | Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia |
title_full | Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia |
title_fullStr | Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia |
title_full_unstemmed | Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia |
title_short | Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia |
title_sort | design considerations for clinical trials in aphasia |
topic | View Point |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343126 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aian.AIAN_453_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT palmerrebecca designconsiderationsforclinicaltrialsinaphasia |