Cargando…

Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia

The use of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) design to evaluate the effectiveness of new interventions in aphasia has increased in recent years in response to calls for high quality evidence of the effectiveness of interventions for this population. This view-point article highlights some of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Palmer, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343126
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aian.AIAN_453_20
_version_ 1783621947002716160
author Palmer, Rebecca
author_facet Palmer, Rebecca
author_sort Palmer, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description The use of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) design to evaluate the effectiveness of new interventions in aphasia has increased in recent years in response to calls for high quality evidence of the effectiveness of interventions for this population. This view-point article highlights some of the important considerations when designing a trial for an aphasia intervention, illustrated with decisions made when designing the Big CACTUS RCT for self-managed computer-based word finding therapy in aphasia. Considerations outlined include whether an RCT is needed, readiness for conducting an RCT, choice of comparators, randomisation options, blinding/masking, selection of outcome measures, pragmatic versus explanatory approaches, and fidelity measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7731679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77316792020-12-18 Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia Palmer, Rebecca Ann Indian Acad Neurol View Point The use of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) design to evaluate the effectiveness of new interventions in aphasia has increased in recent years in response to calls for high quality evidence of the effectiveness of interventions for this population. This view-point article highlights some of the important considerations when designing a trial for an aphasia intervention, illustrated with decisions made when designing the Big CACTUS RCT for self-managed computer-based word finding therapy in aphasia. Considerations outlined include whether an RCT is needed, readiness for conducting an RCT, choice of comparators, randomisation options, blinding/masking, selection of outcome measures, pragmatic versus explanatory approaches, and fidelity measurement. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-09 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7731679/ /pubmed/33343126 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aian.AIAN_453_20 Text en Copyright: © 2006 - 2020 Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle View Point
Palmer, Rebecca
Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia
title Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia
title_full Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia
title_fullStr Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia
title_full_unstemmed Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia
title_short Design Considerations for Clinical Trials in Aphasia
title_sort design considerations for clinical trials in aphasia
topic View Point
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343126
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aian.AIAN_453_20
work_keys_str_mv AT palmerrebecca designconsiderationsforclinicaltrialsinaphasia