Cargando…

Management of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections diagnosed in primary care using a centralised nurse-led telephone-based service: mixed methods evaluation

BACKGROUND: Up to 18% of genital Chlamydia infections and 9% of Gonorrhoea infections in England are diagnosed in Primary Care. Evidence suggests that a substantial proportion of these cases are not managed appropriately in line with national guidelines. With the increase in sexually transmitted inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horwood, Jeremy, Brangan, Emer, Manley, Petra, Horner, Paddy, Muir, Peter, North, Paul, Macleod, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01329-0
_version_ 1783621959765983232
author Horwood, Jeremy
Brangan, Emer
Manley, Petra
Horner, Paddy
Muir, Peter
North, Paul
Macleod, John
author_facet Horwood, Jeremy
Brangan, Emer
Manley, Petra
Horner, Paddy
Muir, Peter
North, Paul
Macleod, John
author_sort Horwood, Jeremy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Up to 18% of genital Chlamydia infections and 9% of Gonorrhoea infections in England are diagnosed in Primary Care. Evidence suggests that a substantial proportion of these cases are not managed appropriately in line with national guidelines. With the increase in sexually transmitted infections and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, their timely and appropriate treatment is a priority. We investigated feasibility and acceptability of extending the National Chlamydia Screening Programme’s centralised, nurse-led, telephone management (NLTM) as an option for management of all cases of chlamydia and gonorrhoea diagnosed in Primary Care. METHODS: Randomised feasibility trial in 11 practices in Bristol with nested qualitative study. In intervention practices patients and health care providers (HCPs) had the option of choosing NLTM or usual care for all patients tested for Chlamydia and Gonorrhoea. In control practices patients received usual care. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred fifty-four Chlamydia/gonorrhoea tests took place during the 6-month study, with a chlamydia positivity rate of 2.6% and gonorrhoea positivity rate of 0.8%. The NLTM managed 335 patients. Interviews were conducted with sixteen HCPs (11 GPs, 5 nurses) and 12 patients (8 female). HCPs were positive about the NLTM, welcomed the partner notification service, though requested more timely feedback on the management of their patients. Explaining the NLTM to patients didn’t negatively impact on consultations. Patients found the NLTM acceptable, more convenient and provided greater anonymity than usual care. Patients appreciated getting a text message regarding a negative result and valued talking to a sexual health specialist about positive results. CONCLUSION: Extension of this established NLTM intervention to a greater proportion of patients was both feasible and acceptable to both patients and HCP, could provide a better service for patients, whilst decreasing primacy care workload. The study provides evidence to support the wider implementation of this NLTM approach to managing chlamydia and gonorrhoea diagnosed in primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7731735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77317352020-12-15 Management of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections diagnosed in primary care using a centralised nurse-led telephone-based service: mixed methods evaluation Horwood, Jeremy Brangan, Emer Manley, Petra Horner, Paddy Muir, Peter North, Paul Macleod, John BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Up to 18% of genital Chlamydia infections and 9% of Gonorrhoea infections in England are diagnosed in Primary Care. Evidence suggests that a substantial proportion of these cases are not managed appropriately in line with national guidelines. With the increase in sexually transmitted infections and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, their timely and appropriate treatment is a priority. We investigated feasibility and acceptability of extending the National Chlamydia Screening Programme’s centralised, nurse-led, telephone management (NLTM) as an option for management of all cases of chlamydia and gonorrhoea diagnosed in Primary Care. METHODS: Randomised feasibility trial in 11 practices in Bristol with nested qualitative study. In intervention practices patients and health care providers (HCPs) had the option of choosing NLTM or usual care for all patients tested for Chlamydia and Gonorrhoea. In control practices patients received usual care. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred fifty-four Chlamydia/gonorrhoea tests took place during the 6-month study, with a chlamydia positivity rate of 2.6% and gonorrhoea positivity rate of 0.8%. The NLTM managed 335 patients. Interviews were conducted with sixteen HCPs (11 GPs, 5 nurses) and 12 patients (8 female). HCPs were positive about the NLTM, welcomed the partner notification service, though requested more timely feedback on the management of their patients. Explaining the NLTM to patients didn’t negatively impact on consultations. Patients found the NLTM acceptable, more convenient and provided greater anonymity than usual care. Patients appreciated getting a text message regarding a negative result and valued talking to a sexual health specialist about positive results. CONCLUSION: Extension of this established NLTM intervention to a greater proportion of patients was both feasible and acceptable to both patients and HCP, could provide a better service for patients, whilst decreasing primacy care workload. The study provides evidence to support the wider implementation of this NLTM approach to managing chlamydia and gonorrhoea diagnosed in primary care. BioMed Central 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7731735/ /pubmed/33302884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01329-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Horwood, Jeremy
Brangan, Emer
Manley, Petra
Horner, Paddy
Muir, Peter
North, Paul
Macleod, John
Management of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections diagnosed in primary care using a centralised nurse-led telephone-based service: mixed methods evaluation
title Management of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections diagnosed in primary care using a centralised nurse-led telephone-based service: mixed methods evaluation
title_full Management of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections diagnosed in primary care using a centralised nurse-led telephone-based service: mixed methods evaluation
title_fullStr Management of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections diagnosed in primary care using a centralised nurse-led telephone-based service: mixed methods evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Management of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections diagnosed in primary care using a centralised nurse-led telephone-based service: mixed methods evaluation
title_short Management of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections diagnosed in primary care using a centralised nurse-led telephone-based service: mixed methods evaluation
title_sort management of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections diagnosed in primary care using a centralised nurse-led telephone-based service: mixed methods evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01329-0
work_keys_str_mv AT horwoodjeremy managementofchlamydiaandgonorrhoeainfectionsdiagnosedinprimarycareusingacentralisednurseledtelephonebasedservicemixedmethodsevaluation
AT branganemer managementofchlamydiaandgonorrhoeainfectionsdiagnosedinprimarycareusingacentralisednurseledtelephonebasedservicemixedmethodsevaluation
AT manleypetra managementofchlamydiaandgonorrhoeainfectionsdiagnosedinprimarycareusingacentralisednurseledtelephonebasedservicemixedmethodsevaluation
AT hornerpaddy managementofchlamydiaandgonorrhoeainfectionsdiagnosedinprimarycareusingacentralisednurseledtelephonebasedservicemixedmethodsevaluation
AT muirpeter managementofchlamydiaandgonorrhoeainfectionsdiagnosedinprimarycareusingacentralisednurseledtelephonebasedservicemixedmethodsevaluation
AT northpaul managementofchlamydiaandgonorrhoeainfectionsdiagnosedinprimarycareusingacentralisednurseledtelephonebasedservicemixedmethodsevaluation
AT macleodjohn managementofchlamydiaandgonorrhoeainfectionsdiagnosedinprimarycareusingacentralisednurseledtelephonebasedservicemixedmethodsevaluation