Cargando…
Decision-making capacity evaluations: the role of neuropsychological assessment from a multidisciplinary perspective
Decision-making capacity (DMC) in aging adults has become increasingly salient as the number of older adults, life expectancy, and the amount of wealth to be transferred from older generations have all increased. The accurate and reliable determination of older adults’ DMC is a particularly importan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01932-x |
_version_ | 1783621967319924736 |
---|---|
author | Wood, Sarah Bally, Klaus Cabane, Christine Fassbind, Patrick Jox, Ralf J. Leyhe, Thomas Monsch, Andreas Trachsel, Manuel |
author_facet | Wood, Sarah Bally, Klaus Cabane, Christine Fassbind, Patrick Jox, Ralf J. Leyhe, Thomas Monsch, Andreas Trachsel, Manuel |
author_sort | Wood, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Decision-making capacity (DMC) in aging adults has become increasingly salient as the number of older adults, life expectancy, and the amount of wealth to be transferred from older generations have all increased. The accurate and reliable determination of older adults’ DMC is a particularly important topic given its implication in legal, financial, and health decisions. Based upon the four-ability DMC model promulgated by Appelbaum and Grisso in the 1980’s, a number of MacArthur Competence Assessment Tools have been developed and widely utilized. However, these tools do not include cognitive testing or other sources of objective data and have limited validity in a medico-legal setting, necessitating additional options for the evaluation of DMC. This is significant from the perspective of the patient because they have a vested interest in accurate and objective assessment of their DMC across domains. Given the disparities in the assessment of DMC, the authors propose, through this debate article, that the evaluation of DMC in the aging adult population utilize a combination of traditional interview and domain specific instruments and neuropsychological testing. To achieve a consensus on the issue, medical experts in a number of fields related to capacity evaluation, including psychiatry, neurology, neuropsychology, and general medicine were consulted and recruited as authors. Experts in Swiss law and ethics were also consulted and provided input. A tendency to focus on a single capacity, and in particular, the ability to consent to medical treatment, arose in the literature. Similarly, there are many instruments purporting to evaluate a single capacity (e.g., consenting to medical treatment, managing finances), while other areas important to the evaluation of DMC received little attention (e.g., activities of daily living, the ability to live independently, to marry, to resist undue influence, and to make a will or advanced care directive). Medical and legal experts in the multidisciplinary group agreed that there is a clear need for more consistency across evaluation of DMC domains and that a combined approach of traditional methods and neuropsychological testing provides a more thorough evaluation and better serves the patient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7731768 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77317682020-12-15 Decision-making capacity evaluations: the role of neuropsychological assessment from a multidisciplinary perspective Wood, Sarah Bally, Klaus Cabane, Christine Fassbind, Patrick Jox, Ralf J. Leyhe, Thomas Monsch, Andreas Trachsel, Manuel BMC Geriatr Debate Decision-making capacity (DMC) in aging adults has become increasingly salient as the number of older adults, life expectancy, and the amount of wealth to be transferred from older generations have all increased. The accurate and reliable determination of older adults’ DMC is a particularly important topic given its implication in legal, financial, and health decisions. Based upon the four-ability DMC model promulgated by Appelbaum and Grisso in the 1980’s, a number of MacArthur Competence Assessment Tools have been developed and widely utilized. However, these tools do not include cognitive testing or other sources of objective data and have limited validity in a medico-legal setting, necessitating additional options for the evaluation of DMC. This is significant from the perspective of the patient because they have a vested interest in accurate and objective assessment of their DMC across domains. Given the disparities in the assessment of DMC, the authors propose, through this debate article, that the evaluation of DMC in the aging adult population utilize a combination of traditional interview and domain specific instruments and neuropsychological testing. To achieve a consensus on the issue, medical experts in a number of fields related to capacity evaluation, including psychiatry, neurology, neuropsychology, and general medicine were consulted and recruited as authors. Experts in Swiss law and ethics were also consulted and provided input. A tendency to focus on a single capacity, and in particular, the ability to consent to medical treatment, arose in the literature. Similarly, there are many instruments purporting to evaluate a single capacity (e.g., consenting to medical treatment, managing finances), while other areas important to the evaluation of DMC received little attention (e.g., activities of daily living, the ability to live independently, to marry, to resist undue influence, and to make a will or advanced care directive). Medical and legal experts in the multidisciplinary group agreed that there is a clear need for more consistency across evaluation of DMC domains and that a combined approach of traditional methods and neuropsychological testing provides a more thorough evaluation and better serves the patient. BioMed Central 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7731768/ /pubmed/33302888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01932-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Debate Wood, Sarah Bally, Klaus Cabane, Christine Fassbind, Patrick Jox, Ralf J. Leyhe, Thomas Monsch, Andreas Trachsel, Manuel Decision-making capacity evaluations: the role of neuropsychological assessment from a multidisciplinary perspective |
title | Decision-making capacity evaluations: the role of neuropsychological assessment from a multidisciplinary perspective |
title_full | Decision-making capacity evaluations: the role of neuropsychological assessment from a multidisciplinary perspective |
title_fullStr | Decision-making capacity evaluations: the role of neuropsychological assessment from a multidisciplinary perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Decision-making capacity evaluations: the role of neuropsychological assessment from a multidisciplinary perspective |
title_short | Decision-making capacity evaluations: the role of neuropsychological assessment from a multidisciplinary perspective |
title_sort | decision-making capacity evaluations: the role of neuropsychological assessment from a multidisciplinary perspective |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01932-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woodsarah decisionmakingcapacityevaluationstheroleofneuropsychologicalassessmentfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT ballyklaus decisionmakingcapacityevaluationstheroleofneuropsychologicalassessmentfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT cabanechristine decisionmakingcapacityevaluationstheroleofneuropsychologicalassessmentfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT fassbindpatrick decisionmakingcapacityevaluationstheroleofneuropsychologicalassessmentfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT joxralfj decisionmakingcapacityevaluationstheroleofneuropsychologicalassessmentfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT leyhethomas decisionmakingcapacityevaluationstheroleofneuropsychologicalassessmentfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT monschandreas decisionmakingcapacityevaluationstheroleofneuropsychologicalassessmentfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT trachselmanuel decisionmakingcapacityevaluationstheroleofneuropsychologicalassessmentfromamultidisciplinaryperspective |