Cargando…

Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Currently, there is no molecular‐targeted agent that has demonstrated evidence of efficacy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u‐HCC) who have developed resistance to treatment with lenvatinib (LEN). In this real‐world study, we aimed to investigate the therap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomonari, Tetsu, Sato, Yasushi, Tanaka, Hironori, Tanaka, Takahiro, Taniguchi, Tatsuya, Sogabe, Msasahiro, Okamoto, Koichi, Miyamoto, Hiroshi, Muguruma, Naoki, Takayama, Tetsuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33319048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12408
_version_ 1783621976435195904
author Tomonari, Tetsu
Sato, Yasushi
Tanaka, Hironori
Tanaka, Takahiro
Taniguchi, Tatsuya
Sogabe, Msasahiro
Okamoto, Koichi
Miyamoto, Hiroshi
Muguruma, Naoki
Takayama, Tetsuji
author_facet Tomonari, Tetsu
Sato, Yasushi
Tanaka, Hironori
Tanaka, Takahiro
Taniguchi, Tatsuya
Sogabe, Msasahiro
Okamoto, Koichi
Miyamoto, Hiroshi
Muguruma, Naoki
Takayama, Tetsuji
author_sort Tomonari, Tetsu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Currently, there is no molecular‐targeted agent that has demonstrated evidence of efficacy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u‐HCC) who have developed resistance to treatment with lenvatinib (LEN). In this real‐world study, we aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect and safety of sorafenib (SOR) in patients with u‐HCC after progression on treatment with LEN. METHODS (PATIENTS) AND RESULTS: A total of 13 patients with u‐HCC (12 males and 1 female), who were treated with SOR after progression on LEN, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated via contrast‐enhanced computerized tomography at 8 weeks after the initiation of SOR therapy according to modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) and RECIST. According to mRECIST, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 15.3% (2/13) and 69.2% (9/13), respectively. According to RECIST, the ORR and DCR were 0% (0/13) and 69.2% (9/13), respectively. The median progression‐free survival was 4.1 months. The median albumin‐bilirubin scores did not deteriorate significantly at 4, 6, and 8 weeks after initiation of SOR, compared with the scores at the baseline. The most frequent grade 1 or 2 adverse events (AEs) were palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia, fatigue, diarrhea, and hypertension. There was no incidence of grade 3 AEs. CONCLUSION: Treatment with SOR may be effective for u‐HCC after failure on LEN and may not worsen the liver reserve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7731817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77318172020-12-13 Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma Tomonari, Tetsu Sato, Yasushi Tanaka, Hironori Tanaka, Takahiro Taniguchi, Tatsuya Sogabe, Msasahiro Okamoto, Koichi Miyamoto, Hiroshi Muguruma, Naoki Takayama, Tetsuji JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: Currently, there is no molecular‐targeted agent that has demonstrated evidence of efficacy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u‐HCC) who have developed resistance to treatment with lenvatinib (LEN). In this real‐world study, we aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect and safety of sorafenib (SOR) in patients with u‐HCC after progression on treatment with LEN. METHODS (PATIENTS) AND RESULTS: A total of 13 patients with u‐HCC (12 males and 1 female), who were treated with SOR after progression on LEN, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated via contrast‐enhanced computerized tomography at 8 weeks after the initiation of SOR therapy according to modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) and RECIST. According to mRECIST, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 15.3% (2/13) and 69.2% (9/13), respectively. According to RECIST, the ORR and DCR were 0% (0/13) and 69.2% (9/13), respectively. The median progression‐free survival was 4.1 months. The median albumin‐bilirubin scores did not deteriorate significantly at 4, 6, and 8 weeks after initiation of SOR, compared with the scores at the baseline. The most frequent grade 1 or 2 adverse events (AEs) were palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia, fatigue, diarrhea, and hypertension. There was no incidence of grade 3 AEs. CONCLUSION: Treatment with SOR may be effective for u‐HCC after failure on LEN and may not worsen the liver reserve. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2020-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7731817/ /pubmed/33319048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12408 Text en © 2020 The Authors. JGH Open published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tomonari, Tetsu
Sato, Yasushi
Tanaka, Hironori
Tanaka, Takahiro
Taniguchi, Tatsuya
Sogabe, Msasahiro
Okamoto, Koichi
Miyamoto, Hiroshi
Muguruma, Naoki
Takayama, Tetsuji
Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
title Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33319048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12408
work_keys_str_mv AT tomonaritetsu sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT satoyasushi sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT tanakahironori sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT tanakatakahiro sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT taniguchitatsuya sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT sogabemsasahiro sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT okamotokoichi sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT miyamotohiroshi sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT mugurumanaoki sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT takayamatetsuji sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma