Cargando…
Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Currently, there is no molecular‐targeted agent that has demonstrated evidence of efficacy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u‐HCC) who have developed resistance to treatment with lenvatinib (LEN). In this real‐world study, we aimed to investigate the therap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33319048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12408 |
_version_ | 1783621976435195904 |
---|---|
author | Tomonari, Tetsu Sato, Yasushi Tanaka, Hironori Tanaka, Takahiro Taniguchi, Tatsuya Sogabe, Msasahiro Okamoto, Koichi Miyamoto, Hiroshi Muguruma, Naoki Takayama, Tetsuji |
author_facet | Tomonari, Tetsu Sato, Yasushi Tanaka, Hironori Tanaka, Takahiro Taniguchi, Tatsuya Sogabe, Msasahiro Okamoto, Koichi Miyamoto, Hiroshi Muguruma, Naoki Takayama, Tetsuji |
author_sort | Tomonari, Tetsu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: Currently, there is no molecular‐targeted agent that has demonstrated evidence of efficacy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u‐HCC) who have developed resistance to treatment with lenvatinib (LEN). In this real‐world study, we aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect and safety of sorafenib (SOR) in patients with u‐HCC after progression on treatment with LEN. METHODS (PATIENTS) AND RESULTS: A total of 13 patients with u‐HCC (12 males and 1 female), who were treated with SOR after progression on LEN, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated via contrast‐enhanced computerized tomography at 8 weeks after the initiation of SOR therapy according to modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) and RECIST. According to mRECIST, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 15.3% (2/13) and 69.2% (9/13), respectively. According to RECIST, the ORR and DCR were 0% (0/13) and 69.2% (9/13), respectively. The median progression‐free survival was 4.1 months. The median albumin‐bilirubin scores did not deteriorate significantly at 4, 6, and 8 weeks after initiation of SOR, compared with the scores at the baseline. The most frequent grade 1 or 2 adverse events (AEs) were palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia, fatigue, diarrhea, and hypertension. There was no incidence of grade 3 AEs. CONCLUSION: Treatment with SOR may be effective for u‐HCC after failure on LEN and may not worsen the liver reserve. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7731817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77318172020-12-13 Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma Tomonari, Tetsu Sato, Yasushi Tanaka, Hironori Tanaka, Takahiro Taniguchi, Tatsuya Sogabe, Msasahiro Okamoto, Koichi Miyamoto, Hiroshi Muguruma, Naoki Takayama, Tetsuji JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: Currently, there is no molecular‐targeted agent that has demonstrated evidence of efficacy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u‐HCC) who have developed resistance to treatment with lenvatinib (LEN). In this real‐world study, we aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect and safety of sorafenib (SOR) in patients with u‐HCC after progression on treatment with LEN. METHODS (PATIENTS) AND RESULTS: A total of 13 patients with u‐HCC (12 males and 1 female), who were treated with SOR after progression on LEN, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated via contrast‐enhanced computerized tomography at 8 weeks after the initiation of SOR therapy according to modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) and RECIST. According to mRECIST, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 15.3% (2/13) and 69.2% (9/13), respectively. According to RECIST, the ORR and DCR were 0% (0/13) and 69.2% (9/13), respectively. The median progression‐free survival was 4.1 months. The median albumin‐bilirubin scores did not deteriorate significantly at 4, 6, and 8 weeks after initiation of SOR, compared with the scores at the baseline. The most frequent grade 1 or 2 adverse events (AEs) were palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia, fatigue, diarrhea, and hypertension. There was no incidence of grade 3 AEs. CONCLUSION: Treatment with SOR may be effective for u‐HCC after failure on LEN and may not worsen the liver reserve. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2020-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7731817/ /pubmed/33319048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12408 Text en © 2020 The Authors. JGH Open published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Tomonari, Tetsu Sato, Yasushi Tanaka, Hironori Tanaka, Takahiro Taniguchi, Tatsuya Sogabe, Msasahiro Okamoto, Koichi Miyamoto, Hiroshi Muguruma, Naoki Takayama, Tetsuji Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma |
title | Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_full | Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_short | Sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_sort | sorafenib as second‐line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33319048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12408 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomonaritetsu sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT satoyasushi sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT tanakahironori sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT tanakatakahiro sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT taniguchitatsuya sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT sogabemsasahiro sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT okamotokoichi sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT miyamotohiroshi sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT mugurumanaoki sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT takayamatetsuji sorafenibassecondlinetreatmentoptionafterfailureoflenvatinibinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma |