Cargando…

Early radiological response evaluation with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 stratifies survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Lenvatinib (LEN) has an antitumor effect with an early reduction in contrast enhancement for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to reveal the most useful radiological response evaluation for overall survival (OS) in patients treated with LEN. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaneko, Shun, Tsuchiya, Kaoru, Yasui, Yutaka, Inada, Kento, Kirino, Sakura, Yamashita, Koji, Osawa, Leona, Hayakawa, Yuka, Sekiguchi, Shuhei, Higuchi, Mayu, Takaura, Kenta, Maeyashiki, Chiaki, Tamaki, Nobuharu, Takeguchi, Takaya, Takeguchi, Yuko, Nakanishi, Hiroyuki, Itakura, Jun, Takahashi, Yuka, Himeno, Yoshiro, Kurosaki, Masayuki, Izumi, Namiki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33319054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12420
_version_ 1783621980523593728
author Kaneko, Shun
Tsuchiya, Kaoru
Yasui, Yutaka
Inada, Kento
Kirino, Sakura
Yamashita, Koji
Osawa, Leona
Hayakawa, Yuka
Sekiguchi, Shuhei
Higuchi, Mayu
Takaura, Kenta
Maeyashiki, Chiaki
Tamaki, Nobuharu
Takeguchi, Takaya
Takeguchi, Yuko
Nakanishi, Hiroyuki
Itakura, Jun
Takahashi, Yuka
Himeno, Yoshiro
Kurosaki, Masayuki
Izumi, Namiki
author_facet Kaneko, Shun
Tsuchiya, Kaoru
Yasui, Yutaka
Inada, Kento
Kirino, Sakura
Yamashita, Koji
Osawa, Leona
Hayakawa, Yuka
Sekiguchi, Shuhei
Higuchi, Mayu
Takaura, Kenta
Maeyashiki, Chiaki
Tamaki, Nobuharu
Takeguchi, Takaya
Takeguchi, Yuko
Nakanishi, Hiroyuki
Itakura, Jun
Takahashi, Yuka
Himeno, Yoshiro
Kurosaki, Masayuki
Izumi, Namiki
author_sort Kaneko, Shun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Lenvatinib (LEN) has an antitumor effect with an early reduction in contrast enhancement for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to reveal the most useful radiological response evaluation for overall survival (OS) in patients treated with LEN. METHODS: Patients receiving LEN therapy (n = 80) were retrospectively recruited from April 2018 to January 2020. Enhanced computed tomography scans were performed at baseline and every 4–8 weeks. OS and radiological response were evaluated using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST 1.1), modified RECIST (mRECIST), and Choi criteria. To be eligible for study, a minimal cumulative duration of LEN was 4 weeks. A total of 62 patients were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The median OS was 469 days. The RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, and Choi criteria identified 14 (22.5%), 30 (48.3%), and 33 (53.2%) patients with an objective response, respectively. In the univariate analysis, Child–Pugh class B, major vascular invasion, and high alpha‐fetoprotein (>200) were statistically significant poor prognostic factors. Radiological response was a significantly better prognostic factor in each criterion (RECIST, mRECIST, and Choi). In the multivariate analysis, radiological response evaluated by RECIST (hazard ratio, 0.259; 95% confidence interval, 0.0723–0.928; P = 0.038) was an independent factor. Furthermore, only RECIST significantly stratified prognosis (P = 0.041) when limited to the first evaluation. CONCLUSION: RECIST 1.1 was useful even as early therapeutic evaluation for HCC patients treated with LEN. Understanding the characteristics of radiological response over time may contribute to improving the prognosis of patients with HCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7731835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77318352020-12-13 Early radiological response evaluation with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 stratifies survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib Kaneko, Shun Tsuchiya, Kaoru Yasui, Yutaka Inada, Kento Kirino, Sakura Yamashita, Koji Osawa, Leona Hayakawa, Yuka Sekiguchi, Shuhei Higuchi, Mayu Takaura, Kenta Maeyashiki, Chiaki Tamaki, Nobuharu Takeguchi, Takaya Takeguchi, Yuko Nakanishi, Hiroyuki Itakura, Jun Takahashi, Yuka Himeno, Yoshiro Kurosaki, Masayuki Izumi, Namiki JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: Lenvatinib (LEN) has an antitumor effect with an early reduction in contrast enhancement for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to reveal the most useful radiological response evaluation for overall survival (OS) in patients treated with LEN. METHODS: Patients receiving LEN therapy (n = 80) were retrospectively recruited from April 2018 to January 2020. Enhanced computed tomography scans were performed at baseline and every 4–8 weeks. OS and radiological response were evaluated using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST 1.1), modified RECIST (mRECIST), and Choi criteria. To be eligible for study, a minimal cumulative duration of LEN was 4 weeks. A total of 62 patients were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The median OS was 469 days. The RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, and Choi criteria identified 14 (22.5%), 30 (48.3%), and 33 (53.2%) patients with an objective response, respectively. In the univariate analysis, Child–Pugh class B, major vascular invasion, and high alpha‐fetoprotein (>200) were statistically significant poor prognostic factors. Radiological response was a significantly better prognostic factor in each criterion (RECIST, mRECIST, and Choi). In the multivariate analysis, radiological response evaluated by RECIST (hazard ratio, 0.259; 95% confidence interval, 0.0723–0.928; P = 0.038) was an independent factor. Furthermore, only RECIST significantly stratified prognosis (P = 0.041) when limited to the first evaluation. CONCLUSION: RECIST 1.1 was useful even as early therapeutic evaluation for HCC patients treated with LEN. Understanding the characteristics of radiological response over time may contribute to improving the prognosis of patients with HCC. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7731835/ /pubmed/33319054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12420 Text en © 2020 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kaneko, Shun
Tsuchiya, Kaoru
Yasui, Yutaka
Inada, Kento
Kirino, Sakura
Yamashita, Koji
Osawa, Leona
Hayakawa, Yuka
Sekiguchi, Shuhei
Higuchi, Mayu
Takaura, Kenta
Maeyashiki, Chiaki
Tamaki, Nobuharu
Takeguchi, Takaya
Takeguchi, Yuko
Nakanishi, Hiroyuki
Itakura, Jun
Takahashi, Yuka
Himeno, Yoshiro
Kurosaki, Masayuki
Izumi, Namiki
Early radiological response evaluation with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 stratifies survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib
title Early radiological response evaluation with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 stratifies survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib
title_full Early radiological response evaluation with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 stratifies survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib
title_fullStr Early radiological response evaluation with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 stratifies survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib
title_full_unstemmed Early radiological response evaluation with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 stratifies survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib
title_short Early radiological response evaluation with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 stratifies survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib
title_sort early radiological response evaluation with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 stratifies survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33319054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12420
work_keys_str_mv AT kanekoshun earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT tsuchiyakaoru earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT yasuiyutaka earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT inadakento earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT kirinosakura earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT yamashitakoji earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT osawaleona earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT hayakawayuka earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT sekiguchishuhei earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT higuchimayu earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT takaurakenta earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT maeyashikichiaki earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT tamakinobuharu earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT takeguchitakaya earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT takeguchiyuko earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT nakanishihiroyuki earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT itakurajun earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT takahashiyuka earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT himenoyoshiro earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT kurosakimasayuki earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib
AT izuminamiki earlyradiologicalresponseevaluationwithresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumors11stratifiessurvivalinhepatocellularcarcinomapatientstreatedwithlenvatinib