Cargando…
Body fat indicators for cardiometabolic risk screening among shift workers
BACKGROUND: In view of the costly methods currently available for the assessment of body adiposity, anthropometric obesity indicators have proven effective in predicting cardiovascular risk. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discriminatory power of body fat indicators for cardiovascular risk screening a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho (ANAMT)
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33324453 http://dx.doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2020-440 |
_version_ | 1783622007647109120 |
---|---|
author | Diniz, Amanda Popolino Alves, Márcia Elivane Fajardo, Virgínia Capistrano de Freitas, Silvia Nascimento Batista, Guilherme Augusto Sousa Athadeu, Bruno Francia Maia Machado-Coelho, George Luiz Lins de Oliveira, Fernando Luiz Pereira Pimenta, Fausto Aloísio Pedrosa do Nascimento Neto, Raimundo Marques |
author_facet | Diniz, Amanda Popolino Alves, Márcia Elivane Fajardo, Virgínia Capistrano de Freitas, Silvia Nascimento Batista, Guilherme Augusto Sousa Athadeu, Bruno Francia Maia Machado-Coelho, George Luiz Lins de Oliveira, Fernando Luiz Pereira Pimenta, Fausto Aloísio Pedrosa do Nascimento Neto, Raimundo Marques |
author_sort | Diniz, Amanda Popolino |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In view of the costly methods currently available for the assessment of body adiposity, anthropometric obesity indicators have proven effective in predicting cardiovascular risk. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discriminatory power of body fat indicators for cardiovascular risk screening among shift workers. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with male employees of an iron ore extraction company. The predictive power of body fat indicators relative to cardiovascular risk was analyzed based on the Framingham risk score and metabolic syndrome by means of receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden’s index. RESULTS: The prevalence of cardiovascular risk was 14.2% in the metabolic syndrome risk model. According to the Framingham score, 95.0%, 4.1% and 0.9% of the participants exhibited low, moderate and high risk, respectively. All the analyzed body fat indicators exhibited satisfactory discriminatory power for the tested cardiovascular risk models. CONCLUSION: Waist-height ratio exhibited the highest ability to predict cardiometabolic risk in both risk models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7732043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Associação Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho (ANAMT) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77320432020-12-14 Body fat indicators for cardiometabolic risk screening among shift workers Diniz, Amanda Popolino Alves, Márcia Elivane Fajardo, Virgínia Capistrano de Freitas, Silvia Nascimento Batista, Guilherme Augusto Sousa Athadeu, Bruno Francia Maia Machado-Coelho, George Luiz Lins de Oliveira, Fernando Luiz Pereira Pimenta, Fausto Aloísio Pedrosa do Nascimento Neto, Raimundo Marques Rev Bras Med Trab Original Article BACKGROUND: In view of the costly methods currently available for the assessment of body adiposity, anthropometric obesity indicators have proven effective in predicting cardiovascular risk. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discriminatory power of body fat indicators for cardiovascular risk screening among shift workers. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with male employees of an iron ore extraction company. The predictive power of body fat indicators relative to cardiovascular risk was analyzed based on the Framingham risk score and metabolic syndrome by means of receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden’s index. RESULTS: The prevalence of cardiovascular risk was 14.2% in the metabolic syndrome risk model. According to the Framingham score, 95.0%, 4.1% and 0.9% of the participants exhibited low, moderate and high risk, respectively. All the analyzed body fat indicators exhibited satisfactory discriminatory power for the tested cardiovascular risk models. CONCLUSION: Waist-height ratio exhibited the highest ability to predict cardiometabolic risk in both risk models. Associação Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho (ANAMT) 2020-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7732043/ /pubmed/33324453 http://dx.doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2020-440 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Diniz, Amanda Popolino Alves, Márcia Elivane Fajardo, Virgínia Capistrano de Freitas, Silvia Nascimento Batista, Guilherme Augusto Sousa Athadeu, Bruno Francia Maia Machado-Coelho, George Luiz Lins de Oliveira, Fernando Luiz Pereira Pimenta, Fausto Aloísio Pedrosa do Nascimento Neto, Raimundo Marques Body fat indicators for cardiometabolic risk screening among shift workers |
title | Body fat indicators for cardiometabolic risk screening among shift workers |
title_full | Body fat indicators for cardiometabolic risk screening among shift workers |
title_fullStr | Body fat indicators for cardiometabolic risk screening among shift workers |
title_full_unstemmed | Body fat indicators for cardiometabolic risk screening among shift workers |
title_short | Body fat indicators for cardiometabolic risk screening among shift workers |
title_sort | body fat indicators for cardiometabolic risk screening among shift workers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33324453 http://dx.doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2020-440 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dinizamandapopolino bodyfatindicatorsforcardiometabolicriskscreeningamongshiftworkers AT alvesmarciaelivane bodyfatindicatorsforcardiometabolicriskscreeningamongshiftworkers AT fajardovirginiacapistrano bodyfatindicatorsforcardiometabolicriskscreeningamongshiftworkers AT defreitassilvianascimento bodyfatindicatorsforcardiometabolicriskscreeningamongshiftworkers AT batistaguilhermeaugustosousa bodyfatindicatorsforcardiometabolicriskscreeningamongshiftworkers AT athadeubrunofranciamaia bodyfatindicatorsforcardiometabolicriskscreeningamongshiftworkers AT machadocoelhogeorgeluizlins bodyfatindicatorsforcardiometabolicriskscreeningamongshiftworkers AT deoliveirafernandoluizpereira bodyfatindicatorsforcardiometabolicriskscreeningamongshiftworkers AT pimentafaustoaloisiopedrosa bodyfatindicatorsforcardiometabolicriskscreeningamongshiftworkers AT donascimentonetoraimundomarques bodyfatindicatorsforcardiometabolicriskscreeningamongshiftworkers |