Cargando…

Clinician perspectives on inpatient cystatin C utilization: A qualitative case study at Mayo Clinic

INTRODUCTION: Serum creatinine (SCr) testing has been the mainstay of kidney function assessment for decades despite known limitations. Cystatin C (CysC) is an alternative biomarker that is generally less affected than SCr by pertinent non-renal factors in hospitalized patients, such as muscle mass....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markos, James Roland, Schaepe, Karen S., Teaford, Hilary R., Rule, Andrew D., Kashani, Kianoush B., Lieske, John C., Barreto, Erin F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33306741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243618
_version_ 1783622013825318912
author Markos, James Roland
Schaepe, Karen S.
Teaford, Hilary R.
Rule, Andrew D.
Kashani, Kianoush B.
Lieske, John C.
Barreto, Erin F.
author_facet Markos, James Roland
Schaepe, Karen S.
Teaford, Hilary R.
Rule, Andrew D.
Kashani, Kianoush B.
Lieske, John C.
Barreto, Erin F.
author_sort Markos, James Roland
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Serum creatinine (SCr) testing has been the mainstay of kidney function assessment for decades despite known limitations. Cystatin C (CysC) is an alternative biomarker that is generally less affected than SCr by pertinent non-renal factors in hospitalized patients, such as muscle mass. Despite its potential advantages, the adoption of CysC for inpatient care is not widespread. At one hospital with CysC testing, we demonstrated a significant rise in non-protocolized use over the last decade. This study uses qualitative methods to provide the first report of how clinicians understand, approach, and apply CysC testing in inpatient care. METHODS: Fifteen clinicians from various disciplines were interviewed about their experience with inpatient CysC testing. The semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using a phenomenological approach. RESULTS: Knowledge and confidence with CysC varied greatly. Clinicians reported first learning about the test from colleagues on consulting services or multidisciplinary teams. The majority believed CysC to provide a more accurate measure of kidney function than SCr. Common scenarios for CysC ordering included medication dosing, evaluation of acute kidney injury, and a thorough evaluation of kidney function in patients with risk factors for an altered SCr. Facilitators for ordering CysC included the availability of rapid results turnaround and the automated calculation of glomerular filtration rate based on the biomarker. Barriers to use included a lack of education about CysC, and the absence of an institutional protocol for use. DISCUSSION: Clinicians at our site decided independent of institutional guidance whether and when CysC added value to patient care. While the majority of study participants indicated advantages to rapid turnaround CysC testing, its use depended not just on the features of the specific case but on clinician familiarity and personal preference. Findings from this research can guide the implementation and expansion of CysC testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7732069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77320692020-12-17 Clinician perspectives on inpatient cystatin C utilization: A qualitative case study at Mayo Clinic Markos, James Roland Schaepe, Karen S. Teaford, Hilary R. Rule, Andrew D. Kashani, Kianoush B. Lieske, John C. Barreto, Erin F. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Serum creatinine (SCr) testing has been the mainstay of kidney function assessment for decades despite known limitations. Cystatin C (CysC) is an alternative biomarker that is generally less affected than SCr by pertinent non-renal factors in hospitalized patients, such as muscle mass. Despite its potential advantages, the adoption of CysC for inpatient care is not widespread. At one hospital with CysC testing, we demonstrated a significant rise in non-protocolized use over the last decade. This study uses qualitative methods to provide the first report of how clinicians understand, approach, and apply CysC testing in inpatient care. METHODS: Fifteen clinicians from various disciplines were interviewed about their experience with inpatient CysC testing. The semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using a phenomenological approach. RESULTS: Knowledge and confidence with CysC varied greatly. Clinicians reported first learning about the test from colleagues on consulting services or multidisciplinary teams. The majority believed CysC to provide a more accurate measure of kidney function than SCr. Common scenarios for CysC ordering included medication dosing, evaluation of acute kidney injury, and a thorough evaluation of kidney function in patients with risk factors for an altered SCr. Facilitators for ordering CysC included the availability of rapid results turnaround and the automated calculation of glomerular filtration rate based on the biomarker. Barriers to use included a lack of education about CysC, and the absence of an institutional protocol for use. DISCUSSION: Clinicians at our site decided independent of institutional guidance whether and when CysC added value to patient care. While the majority of study participants indicated advantages to rapid turnaround CysC testing, its use depended not just on the features of the specific case but on clinician familiarity and personal preference. Findings from this research can guide the implementation and expansion of CysC testing. Public Library of Science 2020-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7732069/ /pubmed/33306741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243618 Text en © 2020 Markos et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Markos, James Roland
Schaepe, Karen S.
Teaford, Hilary R.
Rule, Andrew D.
Kashani, Kianoush B.
Lieske, John C.
Barreto, Erin F.
Clinician perspectives on inpatient cystatin C utilization: A qualitative case study at Mayo Clinic
title Clinician perspectives on inpatient cystatin C utilization: A qualitative case study at Mayo Clinic
title_full Clinician perspectives on inpatient cystatin C utilization: A qualitative case study at Mayo Clinic
title_fullStr Clinician perspectives on inpatient cystatin C utilization: A qualitative case study at Mayo Clinic
title_full_unstemmed Clinician perspectives on inpatient cystatin C utilization: A qualitative case study at Mayo Clinic
title_short Clinician perspectives on inpatient cystatin C utilization: A qualitative case study at Mayo Clinic
title_sort clinician perspectives on inpatient cystatin c utilization: a qualitative case study at mayo clinic
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33306741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243618
work_keys_str_mv AT markosjamesroland clinicianperspectivesoninpatientcystatincutilizationaqualitativecasestudyatmayoclinic
AT schaepekarens clinicianperspectivesoninpatientcystatincutilizationaqualitativecasestudyatmayoclinic
AT teafordhilaryr clinicianperspectivesoninpatientcystatincutilizationaqualitativecasestudyatmayoclinic
AT ruleandrewd clinicianperspectivesoninpatientcystatincutilizationaqualitativecasestudyatmayoclinic
AT kashanikianoushb clinicianperspectivesoninpatientcystatincutilizationaqualitativecasestudyatmayoclinic
AT lieskejohnc clinicianperspectivesoninpatientcystatincutilizationaqualitativecasestudyatmayoclinic
AT barretoerinf clinicianperspectivesoninpatientcystatincutilizationaqualitativecasestudyatmayoclinic