Cargando…

Development and validation of a clinical instrument to predict risk of an adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients

OBJECTIVE: Development and internal validation of a clinical tool for assessment of the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADR) in hospitalized patients. METHODOLOGY: Nested case-control study in an open cohort of all patients admitted to a general hospital. Cases of ADR were matched to two controls. E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lima, Sara Iasmin Vieira Cunha, Martins, Rand Randall, Saldanha, Valdjane, Silbiger, Vivian Nogueira, dos Santos, Isabelle Cristina Clemente, de Araújo, Ivonete Batista, Oliveira, Antonio Gouveia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33306728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243714
_version_ 1783622017441857536
author Lima, Sara Iasmin Vieira Cunha
Martins, Rand Randall
Saldanha, Valdjane
Silbiger, Vivian Nogueira
dos Santos, Isabelle Cristina Clemente
de Araújo, Ivonete Batista
Oliveira, Antonio Gouveia
author_facet Lima, Sara Iasmin Vieira Cunha
Martins, Rand Randall
Saldanha, Valdjane
Silbiger, Vivian Nogueira
dos Santos, Isabelle Cristina Clemente
de Araújo, Ivonete Batista
Oliveira, Antonio Gouveia
author_sort Lima, Sara Iasmin Vieira Cunha
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Development and internal validation of a clinical tool for assessment of the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADR) in hospitalized patients. METHODOLOGY: Nested case-control study in an open cohort of all patients admitted to a general hospital. Cases of ADR were matched to two controls. Eighty four patient variables collected at the time of the ADR were analyzed by conditional logistic regression. Multivariate logistic regression with clustering of cases in a random sample of 2/3 of the cases and respective controls, with baseline odds-ratio corrected with an estimate of ADR incidence, was used to obtain regression coefficients for each risk factor and to develop a risk score. The clinical tool was validated in the remaining 1/3 observations. The study was approved by the institution’s research ethics committee. RESULTS: In the 8060 hospitalized patients, ADR occurred in 343 (5.31%), who were matched to 686 controls. Fourteen variables were identified as independent risk factors of ADR: female, past history of ADR, heart rate ≥72 bpm, systolic blood pressure≥148 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure <79 mmHg, diabetes mellitus, serum urea ≥ 67 mg/dL, serum sodium ≥141 mmol/L, serum potassium ≥4.9 mmol/L, main diagnosis of neoplasia, prescription of ≥3 ATC class B drugs, prescription of ATC class R drugs, prescription of intravenous drugs and ≥ 6 oral drugs. In the validation sample, the ADR risk tool based on those variables showed sensitivity 61%, specificity 73% and area under the ROC curve 0.73. CONCLUSION: We report a clinical tool for ADR risk stratification in patients hospitalized in general wards based on 14 variables.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7732084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77320842020-12-17 Development and validation of a clinical instrument to predict risk of an adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients Lima, Sara Iasmin Vieira Cunha Martins, Rand Randall Saldanha, Valdjane Silbiger, Vivian Nogueira dos Santos, Isabelle Cristina Clemente de Araújo, Ivonete Batista Oliveira, Antonio Gouveia PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Development and internal validation of a clinical tool for assessment of the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADR) in hospitalized patients. METHODOLOGY: Nested case-control study in an open cohort of all patients admitted to a general hospital. Cases of ADR were matched to two controls. Eighty four patient variables collected at the time of the ADR were analyzed by conditional logistic regression. Multivariate logistic regression with clustering of cases in a random sample of 2/3 of the cases and respective controls, with baseline odds-ratio corrected with an estimate of ADR incidence, was used to obtain regression coefficients for each risk factor and to develop a risk score. The clinical tool was validated in the remaining 1/3 observations. The study was approved by the institution’s research ethics committee. RESULTS: In the 8060 hospitalized patients, ADR occurred in 343 (5.31%), who were matched to 686 controls. Fourteen variables were identified as independent risk factors of ADR: female, past history of ADR, heart rate ≥72 bpm, systolic blood pressure≥148 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure <79 mmHg, diabetes mellitus, serum urea ≥ 67 mg/dL, serum sodium ≥141 mmol/L, serum potassium ≥4.9 mmol/L, main diagnosis of neoplasia, prescription of ≥3 ATC class B drugs, prescription of ATC class R drugs, prescription of intravenous drugs and ≥ 6 oral drugs. In the validation sample, the ADR risk tool based on those variables showed sensitivity 61%, specificity 73% and area under the ROC curve 0.73. CONCLUSION: We report a clinical tool for ADR risk stratification in patients hospitalized in general wards based on 14 variables. Public Library of Science 2020-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7732084/ /pubmed/33306728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243714 Text en © 2020 Lima et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lima, Sara Iasmin Vieira Cunha
Martins, Rand Randall
Saldanha, Valdjane
Silbiger, Vivian Nogueira
dos Santos, Isabelle Cristina Clemente
de Araújo, Ivonete Batista
Oliveira, Antonio Gouveia
Development and validation of a clinical instrument to predict risk of an adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients
title Development and validation of a clinical instrument to predict risk of an adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients
title_full Development and validation of a clinical instrument to predict risk of an adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients
title_fullStr Development and validation of a clinical instrument to predict risk of an adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a clinical instrument to predict risk of an adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients
title_short Development and validation of a clinical instrument to predict risk of an adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients
title_sort development and validation of a clinical instrument to predict risk of an adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33306728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243714
work_keys_str_mv AT limasaraiasminvieiracunha developmentandvalidationofaclinicalinstrumenttopredictriskofanadversedrugreactionsinhospitalizedpatients
AT martinsrandrandall developmentandvalidationofaclinicalinstrumenttopredictriskofanadversedrugreactionsinhospitalizedpatients
AT saldanhavaldjane developmentandvalidationofaclinicalinstrumenttopredictriskofanadversedrugreactionsinhospitalizedpatients
AT silbigerviviannogueira developmentandvalidationofaclinicalinstrumenttopredictriskofanadversedrugreactionsinhospitalizedpatients
AT dossantosisabellecristinaclemente developmentandvalidationofaclinicalinstrumenttopredictriskofanadversedrugreactionsinhospitalizedpatients
AT dearaujoivonetebatista developmentandvalidationofaclinicalinstrumenttopredictriskofanadversedrugreactionsinhospitalizedpatients
AT oliveiraantoniogouveia developmentandvalidationofaclinicalinstrumenttopredictriskofanadversedrugreactionsinhospitalizedpatients