Cargando…

People’s Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has rapidly been adopted to deliver health care services around the world. To date, studies have not compared people’s experiences with telehealth services during the pandemic in Australia to their experiences with traditional in-person vi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isautier, Jennifer MJ, Copp, Tessa, Ayre, Julie, Cvejic, Erin, Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon, Batcup, Carys, Bonner, Carissa, Dodd, Rachael, Nickel, Brooke, Pickles, Kristen, Cornell, Samuel, Dakin, Thomas, McCaffery, Kirsten J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33156806
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/24531
_version_ 1783622075659845632
author Isautier, Jennifer MJ
Copp, Tessa
Ayre, Julie
Cvejic, Erin
Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon
Batcup, Carys
Bonner, Carissa
Dodd, Rachael
Nickel, Brooke
Pickles, Kristen
Cornell, Samuel
Dakin, Thomas
McCaffery, Kirsten J
author_facet Isautier, Jennifer MJ
Copp, Tessa
Ayre, Julie
Cvejic, Erin
Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon
Batcup, Carys
Bonner, Carissa
Dodd, Rachael
Nickel, Brooke
Pickles, Kristen
Cornell, Samuel
Dakin, Thomas
McCaffery, Kirsten J
author_sort Isautier, Jennifer MJ
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has rapidly been adopted to deliver health care services around the world. To date, studies have not compared people’s experiences with telehealth services during the pandemic in Australia to their experiences with traditional in-person visits. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare participants’ perceptions of telehealth consults to their perceptions of traditional in-person visits and investigate whether people believe that telehealth services would be useful after the pandemic. METHODS: A national, cross-sectional, community survey was conducted between June 5 and June 12, 2020 in Australia. In total, 1369 participants who were aged ≥18 years and lived in Australia were recruited via targeted advertisements on social media (ie, Facebook and Instagram). Participants responded to survey questions about their telehealth experience, which included a free-text response option. A generalized linear model was used to estimate the adjusted relative risks of having a poorer telehealth experience than a traditional in-person visit experience. Content analysis was performed to determine the reasons why telehealth experiences were worse than traditional in-person visit experiences. RESULTS: Of the 596 telehealth users, the majority of respondents (n=369, 61.9%) stated that their telehealth experience was “just as good as” or “better than” their traditional in-person medical appointment experience. On average, respondents perceived that telehealth would be moderately useful to very useful for medical appointments after the COVID-19 pandemic ends (mean 3.67, SD 1.1). Being male (P=.007), having a history of both depression and anxiety (P=.016), and lower patient activation scores (ie, individuals’ willingness to take on the role of managing their health/health care) (P=.036) were significantly associated with a poor telehealth experience. In total, 6 overarching themes were identified from free-text responses for why participants’ telehealth experiences were poorer than their traditional in-person medical appointment experiences, as follows: communication is not as effective, limitations with technology, issues with obtaining prescriptions and pathology results, reduced confidence in their doctor, additional burden for complex care, and inability to be physically examined. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our sample’s responses, telehealth appointment experiences were comparable to traditional in-person medical appointment experiences. Telehealth may be worthwhile as a mode of health care delivery while the pandemic continues, and it may continue to be worthwhile after the pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7732356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77323562020-12-22 People’s Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: Cross-Sectional Survey Study Isautier, Jennifer MJ Copp, Tessa Ayre, Julie Cvejic, Erin Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon Batcup, Carys Bonner, Carissa Dodd, Rachael Nickel, Brooke Pickles, Kristen Cornell, Samuel Dakin, Thomas McCaffery, Kirsten J J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has rapidly been adopted to deliver health care services around the world. To date, studies have not compared people’s experiences with telehealth services during the pandemic in Australia to their experiences with traditional in-person visits. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare participants’ perceptions of telehealth consults to their perceptions of traditional in-person visits and investigate whether people believe that telehealth services would be useful after the pandemic. METHODS: A national, cross-sectional, community survey was conducted between June 5 and June 12, 2020 in Australia. In total, 1369 participants who were aged ≥18 years and lived in Australia were recruited via targeted advertisements on social media (ie, Facebook and Instagram). Participants responded to survey questions about their telehealth experience, which included a free-text response option. A generalized linear model was used to estimate the adjusted relative risks of having a poorer telehealth experience than a traditional in-person visit experience. Content analysis was performed to determine the reasons why telehealth experiences were worse than traditional in-person visit experiences. RESULTS: Of the 596 telehealth users, the majority of respondents (n=369, 61.9%) stated that their telehealth experience was “just as good as” or “better than” their traditional in-person medical appointment experience. On average, respondents perceived that telehealth would be moderately useful to very useful for medical appointments after the COVID-19 pandemic ends (mean 3.67, SD 1.1). Being male (P=.007), having a history of both depression and anxiety (P=.016), and lower patient activation scores (ie, individuals’ willingness to take on the role of managing their health/health care) (P=.036) were significantly associated with a poor telehealth experience. In total, 6 overarching themes were identified from free-text responses for why participants’ telehealth experiences were poorer than their traditional in-person medical appointment experiences, as follows: communication is not as effective, limitations with technology, issues with obtaining prescriptions and pathology results, reduced confidence in their doctor, additional burden for complex care, and inability to be physically examined. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our sample’s responses, telehealth appointment experiences were comparable to traditional in-person medical appointment experiences. Telehealth may be worthwhile as a mode of health care delivery while the pandemic continues, and it may continue to be worthwhile after the pandemic. JMIR Publications 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7732356/ /pubmed/33156806 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/24531 Text en ©Jennifer MJ Isautier, Tessa Copp, Julie Ayre, Erin Cvejic, Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Carys Batcup, Carissa Bonner, Rachael Dodd, Brooke Nickel, Kristen Pickles, Samuel Cornell, Thomas Dakin, Kirsten J McCaffery. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 10.12.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Isautier, Jennifer MJ
Copp, Tessa
Ayre, Julie
Cvejic, Erin
Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon
Batcup, Carys
Bonner, Carissa
Dodd, Rachael
Nickel, Brooke
Pickles, Kristen
Cornell, Samuel
Dakin, Thomas
McCaffery, Kirsten J
People’s Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: Cross-Sectional Survey Study
title People’s Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: Cross-Sectional Survey Study
title_full People’s Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: Cross-Sectional Survey Study
title_fullStr People’s Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: Cross-Sectional Survey Study
title_full_unstemmed People’s Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: Cross-Sectional Survey Study
title_short People’s Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: Cross-Sectional Survey Study
title_sort people’s experiences and satisfaction with telehealth during the covid-19 pandemic in australia: cross-sectional survey study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33156806
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/24531
work_keys_str_mv AT isautierjennifermj peoplesexperiencesandsatisfactionwithtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinaustraliacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT copptessa peoplesexperiencesandsatisfactionwithtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinaustraliacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT ayrejulie peoplesexperiencesandsatisfactionwithtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinaustraliacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT cvejicerin peoplesexperiencesandsatisfactionwithtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinaustraliacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT meyerowitzkatzgideon peoplesexperiencesandsatisfactionwithtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinaustraliacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT batcupcarys peoplesexperiencesandsatisfactionwithtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinaustraliacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT bonnercarissa peoplesexperiencesandsatisfactionwithtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinaustraliacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT doddrachael peoplesexperiencesandsatisfactionwithtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinaustraliacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT nickelbrooke peoplesexperiencesandsatisfactionwithtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinaustraliacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT pickleskristen peoplesexperiencesandsatisfactionwithtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinaustraliacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT cornellsamuel peoplesexperiencesandsatisfactionwithtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinaustraliacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT dakinthomas peoplesexperiencesandsatisfactionwithtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinaustraliacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT mccafferykirstenj peoplesexperiencesandsatisfactionwithtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinaustraliacrosssectionalsurveystudy