Cargando…

Flavorless vs. Flavored Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and E-Liquid on the Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci

INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette (ECIG) use or vaping has become popular globally. While the question “Is vaping safer than smoking?” continues, it is becoming clearer that one of the most dangerous components of E-liquids are the flavorings. Since the oral cavity is the first anatomical site to b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischman, Jacob S., Sista, Swapna, Lee, DongKeun, Cuadra, Giancarlo A., Palazzolo, Dominic L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329035
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.585416
_version_ 1783622097714544640
author Fischman, Jacob S.
Sista, Swapna
Lee, DongKeun
Cuadra, Giancarlo A.
Palazzolo, Dominic L.
author_facet Fischman, Jacob S.
Sista, Swapna
Lee, DongKeun
Cuadra, Giancarlo A.
Palazzolo, Dominic L.
author_sort Fischman, Jacob S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette (ECIG) use or vaping has become popular globally. While the question “Is vaping safer than smoking?” continues, it is becoming clearer that one of the most dangerous components of E-liquids are the flavorings. Since the oral cavity is the first anatomical site to be assaulted by ECIG aerosol, the aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that flavored ECIG aerosols or E-liquids pose a more detrimental effect on the growth of commensal oral streptococcal bacteria compared to flavorless aerosols or E-liquids. METHODS: Kirby Bauer assays and 24-h planktonic growth curves were used to compare the effects of flavorless vs. flavored (tobacco, menthol, cinnamon, strawberry and blueberry) ECIG-generated aerosols and E-liquids on the growth of four common strains of oral commensal bacteria (Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus oralis). RESULTS: Kirby Bauer assays revealed inhibition of growth for all bacteria tested when exposed to 100% menthol, cinnamon or strawberry flavors. In contrast, 5% flavor in E-liquid had no effect. When exposed to 100 puffs of ECIG-generated aerosol ± flavors (≈ 0.05% flavor in brain heart infusion media) or an equivalent amount of E-liquid ± flavors, twenty-four hour planktonic growth curves indicated no effect on growth for all streptococci tested. Subsequent twenty-four hour planktonic growth curves testing the effects of E-liquid ± flavors (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.3125, 0.625, and 1.25% flavor in brain heart infusion media) revealed dose-dependent inhibition of growth, particularly for menthol, cinnamon and strawberry), for all bacteria tested. CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that flavored E-liquids are more detrimental to the growth of oral commensal bacteria than unflavored E-liquids. The streptococci tested in this study are early colonizers and part of the foundation of oral biofilms and dental plaque. Disturbances in the composition and growth of these primary colonizers is crucial to the development of a healthy dental plaque and host-bacteria interactions. E-liquids and their aerosols containing flavoring agents alter the growth of these bacteria. Such perturbations of pioneering oral communities pose a potential risk to the health of the oral cavity and, ultimately, health in general.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7732452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77324522020-12-15 Flavorless vs. Flavored Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and E-Liquid on the Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci Fischman, Jacob S. Sista, Swapna Lee, DongKeun Cuadra, Giancarlo A. Palazzolo, Dominic L. Front Physiol Physiology INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette (ECIG) use or vaping has become popular globally. While the question “Is vaping safer than smoking?” continues, it is becoming clearer that one of the most dangerous components of E-liquids are the flavorings. Since the oral cavity is the first anatomical site to be assaulted by ECIG aerosol, the aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that flavored ECIG aerosols or E-liquids pose a more detrimental effect on the growth of commensal oral streptococcal bacteria compared to flavorless aerosols or E-liquids. METHODS: Kirby Bauer assays and 24-h planktonic growth curves were used to compare the effects of flavorless vs. flavored (tobacco, menthol, cinnamon, strawberry and blueberry) ECIG-generated aerosols and E-liquids on the growth of four common strains of oral commensal bacteria (Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus oralis). RESULTS: Kirby Bauer assays revealed inhibition of growth for all bacteria tested when exposed to 100% menthol, cinnamon or strawberry flavors. In contrast, 5% flavor in E-liquid had no effect. When exposed to 100 puffs of ECIG-generated aerosol ± flavors (≈ 0.05% flavor in brain heart infusion media) or an equivalent amount of E-liquid ± flavors, twenty-four hour planktonic growth curves indicated no effect on growth for all streptococci tested. Subsequent twenty-four hour planktonic growth curves testing the effects of E-liquid ± flavors (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.3125, 0.625, and 1.25% flavor in brain heart infusion media) revealed dose-dependent inhibition of growth, particularly for menthol, cinnamon and strawberry), for all bacteria tested. CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that flavored E-liquids are more detrimental to the growth of oral commensal bacteria than unflavored E-liquids. The streptococci tested in this study are early colonizers and part of the foundation of oral biofilms and dental plaque. Disturbances in the composition and growth of these primary colonizers is crucial to the development of a healthy dental plaque and host-bacteria interactions. E-liquids and their aerosols containing flavoring agents alter the growth of these bacteria. Such perturbations of pioneering oral communities pose a potential risk to the health of the oral cavity and, ultimately, health in general. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7732452/ /pubmed/33329035 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.585416 Text en Copyright © 2020 Fischman, Sista, Lee, Cuadra and Palazzolo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Fischman, Jacob S.
Sista, Swapna
Lee, DongKeun
Cuadra, Giancarlo A.
Palazzolo, Dominic L.
Flavorless vs. Flavored Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and E-Liquid on the Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci
title Flavorless vs. Flavored Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and E-Liquid on the Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci
title_full Flavorless vs. Flavored Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and E-Liquid on the Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci
title_fullStr Flavorless vs. Flavored Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and E-Liquid on the Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci
title_full_unstemmed Flavorless vs. Flavored Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and E-Liquid on the Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci
title_short Flavorless vs. Flavored Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and E-Liquid on the Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci
title_sort flavorless vs. flavored electronic cigarette-generated aerosol and e-liquid on the growth of common oral commensal streptococci
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329035
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.585416
work_keys_str_mv AT fischmanjacobs flavorlessvsflavoredelectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandeliquidonthegrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci
AT sistaswapna flavorlessvsflavoredelectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandeliquidonthegrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci
AT leedongkeun flavorlessvsflavoredelectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandeliquidonthegrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci
AT cuadragiancarloa flavorlessvsflavoredelectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandeliquidonthegrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci
AT palazzolodominicl flavorlessvsflavoredelectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandeliquidonthegrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci