Cargando…

Part II: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Skin Neoplasms

Teledermatology has been proving to be of great help for delivering healthcare, especially now, during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. It is crucial to assess how accurate this method can be for evaluating different dermatoses. Such knowledge can contribute to the dermatologists' decision of whether t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giavina-Bianchi, Mara, Azevedo, Maria Fernanda Dias, Sousa, Raquel Machado, Cordioli, Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.598903
_version_ 1783622106048626688
author Giavina-Bianchi, Mara
Azevedo, Maria Fernanda Dias
Sousa, Raquel Machado
Cordioli, Eduardo
author_facet Giavina-Bianchi, Mara
Azevedo, Maria Fernanda Dias
Sousa, Raquel Machado
Cordioli, Eduardo
author_sort Giavina-Bianchi, Mara
collection PubMed
description Teledermatology has been proving to be of great help for delivering healthcare, especially now, during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. It is crucial to assess how accurate this method can be for evaluating different dermatoses. Such knowledge can contribute to the dermatologists' decision of whether to adhere to teledermatology or not. Our objective was to determine the accuracy of teledermatology in the 10 most frequent skin neoplasms in our population, comparing telediagnosis to histopathological report and in-person dermatologists' diagnosis. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in São Paulo, Brazil, where a store-and-forward teledermatology project was implemented under primary-care attention to triage surgical, more complex, or severe dermatoses. A total of 30,976 patients presenting 55,012 lesions took part in the project. Thirteen teledermatologists who participated in the project had three options to refer the patients: send them directly to biopsy, to the in-person dermatologist, or back to the general physician with the most probable diagnosis and management. In the groups referred to the in-person dermatologist and biopsy, we looked for the 10 most frequent International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-10 (ICD-10) of skin neoplasms, which resulted in 289 histopathologic reports and 803 in-person dermatologists' diagnosis. We were able to compare the ICD-10 codes filled by teledermatologists, in-person dermatologists, and from histopathological reports. The proportion of complete, partial, and no agreement rates between the in-person dermatologist's, histopathologic report, and the teledermatologist's diagnosis was assessed. We also calculated Cohen's kappa, for complete and complete plus partial agreement. The mean complete agreement rate comparing telediagnosis to histopathological report was 54% (157/289; kappa = 0.087), being the highest for malign lesions; to in-person dermatologists was 61% (487/803; kappa = 0.213), highest for benign lesions. When accuracy of telediagnosis for either malign or benign lesions was evaluated, the agreement rate with histopathology was 70% (kappa = 0.529) and with in-person dermatologist, 81% (kappa = 0.582). This study supports that teledermatology for skin neoplasms has moderate accuracy. This result reassures that it can be a proper option for patient care, especially when the goal is to differentiate benign from malign lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7732487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77324872020-12-15 Part II: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Skin Neoplasms Giavina-Bianchi, Mara Azevedo, Maria Fernanda Dias Sousa, Raquel Machado Cordioli, Eduardo Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Teledermatology has been proving to be of great help for delivering healthcare, especially now, during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. It is crucial to assess how accurate this method can be for evaluating different dermatoses. Such knowledge can contribute to the dermatologists' decision of whether to adhere to teledermatology or not. Our objective was to determine the accuracy of teledermatology in the 10 most frequent skin neoplasms in our population, comparing telediagnosis to histopathological report and in-person dermatologists' diagnosis. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in São Paulo, Brazil, where a store-and-forward teledermatology project was implemented under primary-care attention to triage surgical, more complex, or severe dermatoses. A total of 30,976 patients presenting 55,012 lesions took part in the project. Thirteen teledermatologists who participated in the project had three options to refer the patients: send them directly to biopsy, to the in-person dermatologist, or back to the general physician with the most probable diagnosis and management. In the groups referred to the in-person dermatologist and biopsy, we looked for the 10 most frequent International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-10 (ICD-10) of skin neoplasms, which resulted in 289 histopathologic reports and 803 in-person dermatologists' diagnosis. We were able to compare the ICD-10 codes filled by teledermatologists, in-person dermatologists, and from histopathological reports. The proportion of complete, partial, and no agreement rates between the in-person dermatologist's, histopathologic report, and the teledermatologist's diagnosis was assessed. We also calculated Cohen's kappa, for complete and complete plus partial agreement. The mean complete agreement rate comparing telediagnosis to histopathological report was 54% (157/289; kappa = 0.087), being the highest for malign lesions; to in-person dermatologists was 61% (487/803; kappa = 0.213), highest for benign lesions. When accuracy of telediagnosis for either malign or benign lesions was evaluated, the agreement rate with histopathology was 70% (kappa = 0.529) and with in-person dermatologist, 81% (kappa = 0.582). This study supports that teledermatology for skin neoplasms has moderate accuracy. This result reassures that it can be a proper option for patient care, especially when the goal is to differentiate benign from malign lesions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7732487/ /pubmed/33330564 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.598903 Text en Copyright © 2020 Giavina-Bianchi, Azevedo, Sousa and Cordioli. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Giavina-Bianchi, Mara
Azevedo, Maria Fernanda Dias
Sousa, Raquel Machado
Cordioli, Eduardo
Part II: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Skin Neoplasms
title Part II: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Skin Neoplasms
title_full Part II: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Skin Neoplasms
title_fullStr Part II: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Skin Neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed Part II: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Skin Neoplasms
title_short Part II: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Skin Neoplasms
title_sort part ii: accuracy of teledermatology in skin neoplasms
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.598903
work_keys_str_mv AT giavinabianchimara partiiaccuracyofteledermatologyinskinneoplasms
AT azevedomariafernandadias partiiaccuracyofteledermatologyinskinneoplasms
AT sousaraquelmachado partiiaccuracyofteledermatologyinskinneoplasms
AT cordiolieduardo partiiaccuracyofteledermatologyinskinneoplasms