Cargando…

Context-Specific Arousal During Resting in Wolves and Dogs: Effects of Domestication?

Due to domestication, dogs differ from wolves in the way they respond to their environment, including to humans. Selection for tameness and the associated changes to the autonomic nervous system (ANS) regulation have been proposed as the primary mechanisms of domestication. To test this idea, we com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jean-Joseph, Hillary, Kortekaas, Kim, Range, Friederike, Kotrschal, Kurt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329204
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568199
_version_ 1783622126780022784
author Jean-Joseph, Hillary
Kortekaas, Kim
Range, Friederike
Kotrschal, Kurt
author_facet Jean-Joseph, Hillary
Kortekaas, Kim
Range, Friederike
Kotrschal, Kurt
author_sort Jean-Joseph, Hillary
collection PubMed
description Due to domestication, dogs differ from wolves in the way they respond to their environment, including to humans. Selection for tameness and the associated changes to the autonomic nervous system (ANS) regulation have been proposed as the primary mechanisms of domestication. To test this idea, we compared two low-arousal states in equally raised and kept wolves and dogs: resting, a state close to being asleep, and inactive wakefulness, which together take up an important part in the time budgets of wolves and dogs. We measured arousal via cardiac output in three conditions: alone, with a familiar human partner, or with pack members (i.e., conspecifics). Specifically, we compared heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) of six wolves and seven dogs. As patterns of resting can vary adaptively, even between closely related species, we predicted that dogs would be generally more aroused than wolves, because living with humans may come with less predictable contexts than living with conspecifics; hence, dogs would need to be responsive at all times. Furthermore, we predicted that due to the effects of domestication, emotional social support by familiar people would reduce arousal more in dogs than in equally human-socialized wolves, leading to more relaxed dogs than wolves when away from the pack. Overall, we found a clear effect of the interactions between species (i.e., wolf versus dog), arousal state (i.e., resting or awake inactive) and test conditions, on both HR and HRV. Wolves and dogs were more aroused when alone (i.e., higher HR and lower HRV) than when in the presence of conspecifics or a familiar human partner. Dogs were more relaxed than wolves when at rest and close to a familiar human but this difference disappeared when awake. In conclusion, instead of the expected distinct overall differences between wolves and dogs in ANS regulation, we rather found subtle context-specific responses, suggesting that such details are important in understanding the domestication process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7732590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77325902020-12-15 Context-Specific Arousal During Resting in Wolves and Dogs: Effects of Domestication? Jean-Joseph, Hillary Kortekaas, Kim Range, Friederike Kotrschal, Kurt Front Psychol Psychology Due to domestication, dogs differ from wolves in the way they respond to their environment, including to humans. Selection for tameness and the associated changes to the autonomic nervous system (ANS) regulation have been proposed as the primary mechanisms of domestication. To test this idea, we compared two low-arousal states in equally raised and kept wolves and dogs: resting, a state close to being asleep, and inactive wakefulness, which together take up an important part in the time budgets of wolves and dogs. We measured arousal via cardiac output in three conditions: alone, with a familiar human partner, or with pack members (i.e., conspecifics). Specifically, we compared heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) of six wolves and seven dogs. As patterns of resting can vary adaptively, even between closely related species, we predicted that dogs would be generally more aroused than wolves, because living with humans may come with less predictable contexts than living with conspecifics; hence, dogs would need to be responsive at all times. Furthermore, we predicted that due to the effects of domestication, emotional social support by familiar people would reduce arousal more in dogs than in equally human-socialized wolves, leading to more relaxed dogs than wolves when away from the pack. Overall, we found a clear effect of the interactions between species (i.e., wolf versus dog), arousal state (i.e., resting or awake inactive) and test conditions, on both HR and HRV. Wolves and dogs were more aroused when alone (i.e., higher HR and lower HRV) than when in the presence of conspecifics or a familiar human partner. Dogs were more relaxed than wolves when at rest and close to a familiar human but this difference disappeared when awake. In conclusion, instead of the expected distinct overall differences between wolves and dogs in ANS regulation, we rather found subtle context-specific responses, suggesting that such details are important in understanding the domestication process. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7732590/ /pubmed/33329204 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568199 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jean-Joseph, Kortekaas, Range and Kotrschal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Jean-Joseph, Hillary
Kortekaas, Kim
Range, Friederike
Kotrschal, Kurt
Context-Specific Arousal During Resting in Wolves and Dogs: Effects of Domestication?
title Context-Specific Arousal During Resting in Wolves and Dogs: Effects of Domestication?
title_full Context-Specific Arousal During Resting in Wolves and Dogs: Effects of Domestication?
title_fullStr Context-Specific Arousal During Resting in Wolves and Dogs: Effects of Domestication?
title_full_unstemmed Context-Specific Arousal During Resting in Wolves and Dogs: Effects of Domestication?
title_short Context-Specific Arousal During Resting in Wolves and Dogs: Effects of Domestication?
title_sort context-specific arousal during resting in wolves and dogs: effects of domestication?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329204
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568199
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanjosephhillary contextspecificarousalduringrestinginwolvesanddogseffectsofdomestication
AT kortekaaskim contextspecificarousalduringrestinginwolvesanddogseffectsofdomestication
AT rangefriederike contextspecificarousalduringrestinginwolvesanddogseffectsofdomestication
AT kotrschalkurt contextspecificarousalduringrestinginwolvesanddogseffectsofdomestication