Cargando…

Embracing the Social Nature of Recovery: A Qualitative Study on the Resource Group Method for People With Severe Mental Illness

Objective: The resource group method for people with severe mental illness might provide a useful framework to facilitate patient's empowerment and systematically engage significant others. However, no research has explored the perspectives and experiences of patients and their significant othe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tjaden, Cathelijn D., Boumans, Jenny, Mulder, Cornelis L., Kroon, Hans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329113
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.574256
_version_ 1783622130292752384
author Tjaden, Cathelijn D.
Boumans, Jenny
Mulder, Cornelis L.
Kroon, Hans
author_facet Tjaden, Cathelijn D.
Boumans, Jenny
Mulder, Cornelis L.
Kroon, Hans
author_sort Tjaden, Cathelijn D.
collection PubMed
description Objective: The resource group method for people with severe mental illness might provide a useful framework to facilitate patient's empowerment and systematically engage significant others. However, no research has explored the perspectives and experiences of patients and their significant others. This is crucial for better adjustment to the needs of the people using the method. The aim of this study was to develop a useful framework for a deeper understanding of the resource group method and its outcomes. Method: The study used a longitudinal, qualitative multiple case-study design based on grounded theory methodology. During a period of 2 years, the developments and processes in eight resource groups were explored by conducting a total of 74 interviews (e.g., with patients, significant others, and mental health professionals) and 26 observations of resource group meetings. Results: Analysis showed that a well-functioning resource group set the stage for five processes to unfold: (i) experience of support; (ii) acknowledgment of significant others; (iii) activation; (iv) openness; and (v) integration. These processes facilitated recovery both in terms of an arousing curiosity within the patient as well as increasing reciprocity and equality in their social relations. In addition, the method emphasized the uniqueness of each recovery journey, thereby providing a framework to shape recovery-oriented care. The analysis also revealed three hindering factors: (i) embedding and implementation issues; (ii) predominant network; and (iii) tensions inherent in the resource group setting. Conclusion: Working according to the resource group method involves that the person's recovery work becomes a social process that takes place in relation to the social environment and everyday life in which it is important to acknowledge and integrate the needs of significant others in treatment and care. This study provides a first step toward a multidimensional comprehension of the resource group method, the working mechanisms and its influence on recovery for people with severe mental illness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7732607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77326072020-12-15 Embracing the Social Nature of Recovery: A Qualitative Study on the Resource Group Method for People With Severe Mental Illness Tjaden, Cathelijn D. Boumans, Jenny Mulder, Cornelis L. Kroon, Hans Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Objective: The resource group method for people with severe mental illness might provide a useful framework to facilitate patient's empowerment and systematically engage significant others. However, no research has explored the perspectives and experiences of patients and their significant others. This is crucial for better adjustment to the needs of the people using the method. The aim of this study was to develop a useful framework for a deeper understanding of the resource group method and its outcomes. Method: The study used a longitudinal, qualitative multiple case-study design based on grounded theory methodology. During a period of 2 years, the developments and processes in eight resource groups were explored by conducting a total of 74 interviews (e.g., with patients, significant others, and mental health professionals) and 26 observations of resource group meetings. Results: Analysis showed that a well-functioning resource group set the stage for five processes to unfold: (i) experience of support; (ii) acknowledgment of significant others; (iii) activation; (iv) openness; and (v) integration. These processes facilitated recovery both in terms of an arousing curiosity within the patient as well as increasing reciprocity and equality in their social relations. In addition, the method emphasized the uniqueness of each recovery journey, thereby providing a framework to shape recovery-oriented care. The analysis also revealed three hindering factors: (i) embedding and implementation issues; (ii) predominant network; and (iii) tensions inherent in the resource group setting. Conclusion: Working according to the resource group method involves that the person's recovery work becomes a social process that takes place in relation to the social environment and everyday life in which it is important to acknowledge and integrate the needs of significant others in treatment and care. This study provides a first step toward a multidimensional comprehension of the resource group method, the working mechanisms and its influence on recovery for people with severe mental illness. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7732607/ /pubmed/33329113 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.574256 Text en Copyright © 2020 Tjaden, Boumans, Mulder and Kroon. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Tjaden, Cathelijn D.
Boumans, Jenny
Mulder, Cornelis L.
Kroon, Hans
Embracing the Social Nature of Recovery: A Qualitative Study on the Resource Group Method for People With Severe Mental Illness
title Embracing the Social Nature of Recovery: A Qualitative Study on the Resource Group Method for People With Severe Mental Illness
title_full Embracing the Social Nature of Recovery: A Qualitative Study on the Resource Group Method for People With Severe Mental Illness
title_fullStr Embracing the Social Nature of Recovery: A Qualitative Study on the Resource Group Method for People With Severe Mental Illness
title_full_unstemmed Embracing the Social Nature of Recovery: A Qualitative Study on the Resource Group Method for People With Severe Mental Illness
title_short Embracing the Social Nature of Recovery: A Qualitative Study on the Resource Group Method for People With Severe Mental Illness
title_sort embracing the social nature of recovery: a qualitative study on the resource group method for people with severe mental illness
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329113
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.574256
work_keys_str_mv AT tjadencathelijnd embracingthesocialnatureofrecoveryaqualitativestudyontheresourcegroupmethodforpeoplewithseverementalillness
AT boumansjenny embracingthesocialnatureofrecoveryaqualitativestudyontheresourcegroupmethodforpeoplewithseverementalillness
AT muldercornelisl embracingthesocialnatureofrecoveryaqualitativestudyontheresourcegroupmethodforpeoplewithseverementalillness
AT kroonhans embracingthesocialnatureofrecoveryaqualitativestudyontheresourcegroupmethodforpeoplewithseverementalillness