Cargando…

Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastasis in Patients with a Poor Prognosis: Effective or Overtreatment?

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastasis in patients with a poor prognosis remains controversial. Here, we compared results of SRS alone to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in poor-prognosis patients and defined the most important unfavorable prognostic factors related to early de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harat, Maciej, Blok, Maciej, Miechowicz, Izabela, Kowalewska, Joanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33324101
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S272369
_version_ 1783622161154441216
author Harat, Maciej
Blok, Maciej
Miechowicz, Izabela
Kowalewska, Joanna
author_facet Harat, Maciej
Blok, Maciej
Miechowicz, Izabela
Kowalewska, Joanna
author_sort Harat, Maciej
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastasis in patients with a poor prognosis remains controversial. Here, we compared results of SRS alone to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in poor-prognosis patients and defined the most important unfavorable prognostic factors related to early death after SRS alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of prospective SRS data, 180 patients with brain metastases not previously treated with WBRT were analyzed. Results of SRS were compared to WBRT by propensity score matching in patients with a poor prognosis defined by graded prognostic assessment (GPA) <2. Further, SRS patients were divided into training (n=82) and validation (n=48) cohorts. Overall survival (OS) and the risk of early death were defined by univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Median survival of the WBRT and SRS cohorts was 86 days (IQR: 38–172 days) and 201 days (IQR: 86-not reached), respectively (p<0.0001). OS in patients with GPA<2 was significantly longer in the SRS vs WBRT group (123 vs 58 days; p=0.008). Survival was longer in the SRS group in a propensity score matched analysis. In multivariable analysis, GPA (OR: 0.44, 95%CI: 0.21–0.95; p=0.001), extensive extracranial disease (OR: 0.13, 95%CI: 0.02–0.66; p=0.013), and serious neurological deficits (OR: 0.13, 95%CI: 0.04–0.45; p=0.001) were associated with early death. If one factor was favorable, 73% (training) and 92% (validation) of patients survived three months. Patients with GPA <2 presenting with serious neurological deficits and extensive extracranial disease had a low expected benefit due to the highest risk of death within three months (AUC: 0.822 training; 0.932 validation). CONCLUSION: SRS is a viable treatment option for patients with a poor prognosis defined as GPA <2. Good neurological status, extracranial oligometastatic disease, or GPA ≥2 should be present to justify SRS in patients with brain metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7732755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77327552020-12-14 Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastasis in Patients with a Poor Prognosis: Effective or Overtreatment? Harat, Maciej Blok, Maciej Miechowicz, Izabela Kowalewska, Joanna Cancer Manag Res Original Research PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastasis in patients with a poor prognosis remains controversial. Here, we compared results of SRS alone to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in poor-prognosis patients and defined the most important unfavorable prognostic factors related to early death after SRS alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of prospective SRS data, 180 patients with brain metastases not previously treated with WBRT were analyzed. Results of SRS were compared to WBRT by propensity score matching in patients with a poor prognosis defined by graded prognostic assessment (GPA) <2. Further, SRS patients were divided into training (n=82) and validation (n=48) cohorts. Overall survival (OS) and the risk of early death were defined by univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Median survival of the WBRT and SRS cohorts was 86 days (IQR: 38–172 days) and 201 days (IQR: 86-not reached), respectively (p<0.0001). OS in patients with GPA<2 was significantly longer in the SRS vs WBRT group (123 vs 58 days; p=0.008). Survival was longer in the SRS group in a propensity score matched analysis. In multivariable analysis, GPA (OR: 0.44, 95%CI: 0.21–0.95; p=0.001), extensive extracranial disease (OR: 0.13, 95%CI: 0.02–0.66; p=0.013), and serious neurological deficits (OR: 0.13, 95%CI: 0.04–0.45; p=0.001) were associated with early death. If one factor was favorable, 73% (training) and 92% (validation) of patients survived three months. Patients with GPA <2 presenting with serious neurological deficits and extensive extracranial disease had a low expected benefit due to the highest risk of death within three months (AUC: 0.822 training; 0.932 validation). CONCLUSION: SRS is a viable treatment option for patients with a poor prognosis defined as GPA <2. Good neurological status, extracranial oligometastatic disease, or GPA ≥2 should be present to justify SRS in patients with brain metastases. Dove 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7732755/ /pubmed/33324101 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S272369 Text en © 2020 Harat et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Harat, Maciej
Blok, Maciej
Miechowicz, Izabela
Kowalewska, Joanna
Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastasis in Patients with a Poor Prognosis: Effective or Overtreatment?
title Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastasis in Patients with a Poor Prognosis: Effective or Overtreatment?
title_full Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastasis in Patients with a Poor Prognosis: Effective or Overtreatment?
title_fullStr Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastasis in Patients with a Poor Prognosis: Effective or Overtreatment?
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastasis in Patients with a Poor Prognosis: Effective or Overtreatment?
title_short Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastasis in Patients with a Poor Prognosis: Effective or Overtreatment?
title_sort stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastasis in patients with a poor prognosis: effective or overtreatment?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33324101
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S272369
work_keys_str_mv AT haratmaciej stereotacticradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasisinpatientswithapoorprognosiseffectiveorovertreatment
AT blokmaciej stereotacticradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasisinpatientswithapoorprognosiseffectiveorovertreatment
AT miechowiczizabela stereotacticradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasisinpatientswithapoorprognosiseffectiveorovertreatment
AT kowalewskajoanna stereotacticradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasisinpatientswithapoorprognosiseffectiveorovertreatment