Cargando…
Making sense of the evidence in population health intervention research: building a dry stone wall
To effectively tackle population health challenges, we must address the fundamental determinants of behaviour and health. Among other things, this will entail devoting more attention to the evaluation of upstream intervention strategies. However, merely increasing the supply of such studies is not e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7733100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33298470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004017 |
_version_ | 1783622209209630720 |
---|---|
author | Ogilvie, David Bauman, Adrian Foley, Louise Guell, Cornelia Humphreys, David Panter, Jenna |
author_facet | Ogilvie, David Bauman, Adrian Foley, Louise Guell, Cornelia Humphreys, David Panter, Jenna |
author_sort | Ogilvie, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | To effectively tackle population health challenges, we must address the fundamental determinants of behaviour and health. Among other things, this will entail devoting more attention to the evaluation of upstream intervention strategies. However, merely increasing the supply of such studies is not enough. The pivotal link between research and policy or practice should be the cumulation of insight from multiple studies. If conventional evidence synthesis can be thought of as analogous to building a wall, then we can increase the supply of bricks (the number of studies), their similarity (statistical commensurability) or the strength of the mortar (the statistical methods for holding them together). However, many contemporary public health challenges seem akin to herding sheep in mountainous terrain, where ordinary walls are of limited use and a more flexible way of combining dissimilar stones (pieces of evidence) may be required. This would entail shifting towards generalising the functions of interventions, rather than their effects; towards inference to the best explanation, rather than relying on binary hypothesis-testing; and towards embracing divergent findings, to be resolved by testing theories across a cumulated body of work. In this way we might channel a spirit of pragmatic pluralism into making sense of complex sets of evidence, robust enough to support more plausible causal inference to guide action, while accepting and adapting to the reality of the public health landscape rather than wishing it were otherwise. The traditional art of dry stone walling can serve as a metaphor for the more ‘holistic sense-making’ we propose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7733100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77331002020-12-21 Making sense of the evidence in population health intervention research: building a dry stone wall Ogilvie, David Bauman, Adrian Foley, Louise Guell, Cornelia Humphreys, David Panter, Jenna BMJ Glob Health Analysis To effectively tackle population health challenges, we must address the fundamental determinants of behaviour and health. Among other things, this will entail devoting more attention to the evaluation of upstream intervention strategies. However, merely increasing the supply of such studies is not enough. The pivotal link between research and policy or practice should be the cumulation of insight from multiple studies. If conventional evidence synthesis can be thought of as analogous to building a wall, then we can increase the supply of bricks (the number of studies), their similarity (statistical commensurability) or the strength of the mortar (the statistical methods for holding them together). However, many contemporary public health challenges seem akin to herding sheep in mountainous terrain, where ordinary walls are of limited use and a more flexible way of combining dissimilar stones (pieces of evidence) may be required. This would entail shifting towards generalising the functions of interventions, rather than their effects; towards inference to the best explanation, rather than relying on binary hypothesis-testing; and towards embracing divergent findings, to be resolved by testing theories across a cumulated body of work. In this way we might channel a spirit of pragmatic pluralism into making sense of complex sets of evidence, robust enough to support more plausible causal inference to guide action, while accepting and adapting to the reality of the public health landscape rather than wishing it were otherwise. The traditional art of dry stone walling can serve as a metaphor for the more ‘holistic sense-making’ we propose. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7733100/ /pubmed/33298470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004017 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Analysis Ogilvie, David Bauman, Adrian Foley, Louise Guell, Cornelia Humphreys, David Panter, Jenna Making sense of the evidence in population health intervention research: building a dry stone wall |
title | Making sense of the evidence in population health intervention research: building a dry stone wall |
title_full | Making sense of the evidence in population health intervention research: building a dry stone wall |
title_fullStr | Making sense of the evidence in population health intervention research: building a dry stone wall |
title_full_unstemmed | Making sense of the evidence in population health intervention research: building a dry stone wall |
title_short | Making sense of the evidence in population health intervention research: building a dry stone wall |
title_sort | making sense of the evidence in population health intervention research: building a dry stone wall |
topic | Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7733100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33298470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ogilviedavid makingsenseoftheevidenceinpopulationhealthinterventionresearchbuildingadrystonewall AT baumanadrian makingsenseoftheevidenceinpopulationhealthinterventionresearchbuildingadrystonewall AT foleylouise makingsenseoftheevidenceinpopulationhealthinterventionresearchbuildingadrystonewall AT guellcornelia makingsenseoftheevidenceinpopulationhealthinterventionresearchbuildingadrystonewall AT humphreysdavid makingsenseoftheevidenceinpopulationhealthinterventionresearchbuildingadrystonewall AT panterjenna makingsenseoftheevidenceinpopulationhealthinterventionresearchbuildingadrystonewall |