Cargando…

The BDS checklist as measure of illness severity: a cross-sectional cohort study in the Danish general population, primary care and specialised setting

OBJECTIVE: The bodily distress syndrome (BDS) checklist has proven to be useful in the diagnostic categorisation and as screening tool for functional somatic disorders (FSD). This study aims to investigate whether the BDS checklist total sum score (0–100) can be used as a measure of physical symptom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petersen, Marie Weinreich, Rosendal, Marianne, Ørnbøl, Eva, Fink, Per, Jørgensen, Torben, Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz, Schröder, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7733181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042880
_version_ 1783622222436368384
author Petersen, Marie Weinreich
Rosendal, Marianne
Ørnbøl, Eva
Fink, Per
Jørgensen, Torben
Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz
Schröder, Andreas
author_facet Petersen, Marie Weinreich
Rosendal, Marianne
Ørnbøl, Eva
Fink, Per
Jørgensen, Torben
Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz
Schröder, Andreas
author_sort Petersen, Marie Weinreich
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The bodily distress syndrome (BDS) checklist has proven to be useful in the diagnostic categorisation and as screening tool for functional somatic disorders (FSD). This study aims to investigate whether the BDS checklist total sum score (0–100) can be used as a measure of physical symptom burden and FSD illness severity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Danish general population, primary care and specialised clinical setting. PARTICIPANTS: A general population cohort (n=9656), a primary care cohort (n=2480) and a cohort of patients with multiorgan BDS from specialised clinical setting (n=492). OUTCOME MEASURES: All data were self-reported. Physical symptoms were measured with the 25-item BDS checklist. Overall self-perceived health was measured with one item from the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Physical functioning was measured with an aggregate score of four items from the SF-36/SF-12 scales ‘physical functioning’, ‘bodily pain’ and ‘vitality’. Emotional distress was measured with the mental distress subscale (SCL-8) from the Danish version of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-90. Illness worry was measured with the six-item Whiteley Index. RESULTS: For all cohorts, bifactor models established that despite some multidimensionality the total sum score of the BDS checklist adequately reflected physical symptom burden and illness severity. The BDS checklist had acceptable convergent validity with measures of overall health (r=0.25–0.58), physical functioning (r=0.22–0.58), emotional distress (r=0.47–0.62) and illness worry (r=0.36–0.55). Acceptability was good with a low number of missing responses to items (<3%). Internal consistency was high (α ≥0.879). BDS score means varied and reflected symptom burden across cohorts (13.03–46.15). We provide normative data for the Danish general population. CONCLUSIONS: The BDS checklist total sum score can be used as a measure of symptom burden and FSD illness severity across settings. These findings establish the usefulness of the BDS checklist in clinics and in research, both as a diagnostic screening tool and as an instrument to assess illness severity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7733181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77331812020-12-21 The BDS checklist as measure of illness severity: a cross-sectional cohort study in the Danish general population, primary care and specialised setting Petersen, Marie Weinreich Rosendal, Marianne Ørnbøl, Eva Fink, Per Jørgensen, Torben Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz Schröder, Andreas BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVE: The bodily distress syndrome (BDS) checklist has proven to be useful in the diagnostic categorisation and as screening tool for functional somatic disorders (FSD). This study aims to investigate whether the BDS checklist total sum score (0–100) can be used as a measure of physical symptom burden and FSD illness severity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Danish general population, primary care and specialised clinical setting. PARTICIPANTS: A general population cohort (n=9656), a primary care cohort (n=2480) and a cohort of patients with multiorgan BDS from specialised clinical setting (n=492). OUTCOME MEASURES: All data were self-reported. Physical symptoms were measured with the 25-item BDS checklist. Overall self-perceived health was measured with one item from the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Physical functioning was measured with an aggregate score of four items from the SF-36/SF-12 scales ‘physical functioning’, ‘bodily pain’ and ‘vitality’. Emotional distress was measured with the mental distress subscale (SCL-8) from the Danish version of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-90. Illness worry was measured with the six-item Whiteley Index. RESULTS: For all cohorts, bifactor models established that despite some multidimensionality the total sum score of the BDS checklist adequately reflected physical symptom burden and illness severity. The BDS checklist had acceptable convergent validity with measures of overall health (r=0.25–0.58), physical functioning (r=0.22–0.58), emotional distress (r=0.47–0.62) and illness worry (r=0.36–0.55). Acceptability was good with a low number of missing responses to items (<3%). Internal consistency was high (α ≥0.879). BDS score means varied and reflected symptom burden across cohorts (13.03–46.15). We provide normative data for the Danish general population. CONCLUSIONS: The BDS checklist total sum score can be used as a measure of symptom burden and FSD illness severity across settings. These findings establish the usefulness of the BDS checklist in clinics and in research, both as a diagnostic screening tool and as an instrument to assess illness severity. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7733181/ /pubmed/33303469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042880 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Methods
Petersen, Marie Weinreich
Rosendal, Marianne
Ørnbøl, Eva
Fink, Per
Jørgensen, Torben
Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz
Schröder, Andreas
The BDS checklist as measure of illness severity: a cross-sectional cohort study in the Danish general population, primary care and specialised setting
title The BDS checklist as measure of illness severity: a cross-sectional cohort study in the Danish general population, primary care and specialised setting
title_full The BDS checklist as measure of illness severity: a cross-sectional cohort study in the Danish general population, primary care and specialised setting
title_fullStr The BDS checklist as measure of illness severity: a cross-sectional cohort study in the Danish general population, primary care and specialised setting
title_full_unstemmed The BDS checklist as measure of illness severity: a cross-sectional cohort study in the Danish general population, primary care and specialised setting
title_short The BDS checklist as measure of illness severity: a cross-sectional cohort study in the Danish general population, primary care and specialised setting
title_sort bds checklist as measure of illness severity: a cross-sectional cohort study in the danish general population, primary care and specialised setting
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7733181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042880
work_keys_str_mv AT petersenmarieweinreich thebdschecklistasmeasureofillnessseverityacrosssectionalcohortstudyinthedanishgeneralpopulationprimarycareandspecialisedsetting
AT rosendalmarianne thebdschecklistasmeasureofillnessseverityacrosssectionalcohortstudyinthedanishgeneralpopulationprimarycareandspecialisedsetting
AT ørnbøleva thebdschecklistasmeasureofillnessseverityacrosssectionalcohortstudyinthedanishgeneralpopulationprimarycareandspecialisedsetting
AT finkper thebdschecklistasmeasureofillnessseverityacrosssectionalcohortstudyinthedanishgeneralpopulationprimarycareandspecialisedsetting
AT jørgensentorben thebdschecklistasmeasureofillnessseverityacrosssectionalcohortstudyinthedanishgeneralpopulationprimarycareandspecialisedsetting
AT dantoftthomasmeinertz thebdschecklistasmeasureofillnessseverityacrosssectionalcohortstudyinthedanishgeneralpopulationprimarycareandspecialisedsetting
AT schroderandreas thebdschecklistasmeasureofillnessseverityacrosssectionalcohortstudyinthedanishgeneralpopulationprimarycareandspecialisedsetting
AT petersenmarieweinreich bdschecklistasmeasureofillnessseverityacrosssectionalcohortstudyinthedanishgeneralpopulationprimarycareandspecialisedsetting
AT rosendalmarianne bdschecklistasmeasureofillnessseverityacrosssectionalcohortstudyinthedanishgeneralpopulationprimarycareandspecialisedsetting
AT ørnbøleva bdschecklistasmeasureofillnessseverityacrosssectionalcohortstudyinthedanishgeneralpopulationprimarycareandspecialisedsetting
AT finkper bdschecklistasmeasureofillnessseverityacrosssectionalcohortstudyinthedanishgeneralpopulationprimarycareandspecialisedsetting
AT jørgensentorben bdschecklistasmeasureofillnessseverityacrosssectionalcohortstudyinthedanishgeneralpopulationprimarycareandspecialisedsetting
AT dantoftthomasmeinertz bdschecklistasmeasureofillnessseverityacrosssectionalcohortstudyinthedanishgeneralpopulationprimarycareandspecialisedsetting
AT schroderandreas bdschecklistasmeasureofillnessseverityacrosssectionalcohortstudyinthedanishgeneralpopulationprimarycareandspecialisedsetting