Cargando…

Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework

INTRODUCTION: Lower limb conditions requiring reconstructive surgery can be either congenital or acquired from trauma, infection or other medical conditions. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often used by healthcare professionals to assess the impact of a patient’s condition (and treatm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leggett, Heather, Scantlebury, Arabella, Sharma, Hemant, Hewitt, Catherine, Harden, Melissa, McDaid, Catriona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7733194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040378
_version_ 1783622225567416320
author Leggett, Heather
Scantlebury, Arabella
Sharma, Hemant
Hewitt, Catherine
Harden, Melissa
McDaid, Catriona
author_facet Leggett, Heather
Scantlebury, Arabella
Sharma, Hemant
Hewitt, Catherine
Harden, Melissa
McDaid, Catriona
author_sort Leggett, Heather
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lower limb conditions requiring reconstructive surgery can be either congenital or acquired from trauma, infection or other medical conditions. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often used by healthcare professionals to assess the impact of a patient’s condition (and treatment) on quality of life. However, we are not aware of any measures developed specifically for people requiring lower limb reconstructive surgery. Consequently, it is not clear the extent to which current PROMs accurately and specifically measure the outcomes that are important to these patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ‘PROLLIT’ (Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Lower Limb Reconstruction) involves three phases: to explore what is important to patients with regard to quality of life (phase 1), ascertain whether current measures adequately capture these experiences (phase 2) and if not begin, the development of a new PROM (phase 3). The population of interest is people requiring, undergoing or after undergoing reconstructive surgery for a lower limb condition. In this paper, we describe phase 1, which aims to develop a conceptual framework to identify and map what is important to this group with regard to social interactions, employment, perceived health and quality of life after condition onset/injury and throughout recovery. The conceptual framework will be developed through three steps: (step A) a qualitative evidence synthesis, (step B) a qualitative study with patients and staff to explore patient’s views and experiences of lower limb reconstructive surgery and (step C) a round table discussion with key stakeholders where findings from step A and step B will be brought together and used to finalise the conceptual framework. ETHICS CONSIDERATION AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted for the qualitative data collection (step B) from South Central Berkshire Research Ethics committee (REF:20/SC/0114). Findings from steps A and B will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication in academic journals, and presented at academic conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019139587. ISRCTN REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN75201623.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7733194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77331942020-12-21 Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework Leggett, Heather Scantlebury, Arabella Sharma, Hemant Hewitt, Catherine Harden, Melissa McDaid, Catriona BMJ Open Qualitative Research INTRODUCTION: Lower limb conditions requiring reconstructive surgery can be either congenital or acquired from trauma, infection or other medical conditions. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often used by healthcare professionals to assess the impact of a patient’s condition (and treatment) on quality of life. However, we are not aware of any measures developed specifically for people requiring lower limb reconstructive surgery. Consequently, it is not clear the extent to which current PROMs accurately and specifically measure the outcomes that are important to these patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ‘PROLLIT’ (Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Lower Limb Reconstruction) involves three phases: to explore what is important to patients with regard to quality of life (phase 1), ascertain whether current measures adequately capture these experiences (phase 2) and if not begin, the development of a new PROM (phase 3). The population of interest is people requiring, undergoing or after undergoing reconstructive surgery for a lower limb condition. In this paper, we describe phase 1, which aims to develop a conceptual framework to identify and map what is important to this group with regard to social interactions, employment, perceived health and quality of life after condition onset/injury and throughout recovery. The conceptual framework will be developed through three steps: (step A) a qualitative evidence synthesis, (step B) a qualitative study with patients and staff to explore patient’s views and experiences of lower limb reconstructive surgery and (step C) a round table discussion with key stakeholders where findings from step A and step B will be brought together and used to finalise the conceptual framework. ETHICS CONSIDERATION AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted for the qualitative data collection (step B) from South Central Berkshire Research Ethics committee (REF:20/SC/0114). Findings from steps A and B will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication in academic journals, and presented at academic conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019139587. ISRCTN REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN75201623. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7733194/ /pubmed/33303449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040378 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Leggett, Heather
Scantlebury, Arabella
Sharma, Hemant
Hewitt, Catherine
Harden, Melissa
McDaid, Catriona
Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework
title Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework
title_full Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework
title_fullStr Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework
title_full_unstemmed Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework
title_short Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework
title_sort quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7733194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040378
work_keys_str_mv AT leggettheather qualityoflifefollowingalowerlimbreconstructiveprocedureaprotocolforthedevelopmentofaconceptualframework
AT scantleburyarabella qualityoflifefollowingalowerlimbreconstructiveprocedureaprotocolforthedevelopmentofaconceptualframework
AT sharmahemant qualityoflifefollowingalowerlimbreconstructiveprocedureaprotocolforthedevelopmentofaconceptualframework
AT hewittcatherine qualityoflifefollowingalowerlimbreconstructiveprocedureaprotocolforthedevelopmentofaconceptualframework
AT hardenmelissa qualityoflifefollowingalowerlimbreconstructiveprocedureaprotocolforthedevelopmentofaconceptualframework
AT mcdaidcatriona qualityoflifefollowingalowerlimbreconstructiveprocedureaprotocolforthedevelopmentofaconceptualframework
AT qualityoflifefollowingalowerlimbreconstructiveprocedureaprotocolforthedevelopmentofaconceptualframework