Cargando…
Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework
INTRODUCTION: Lower limb conditions requiring reconstructive surgery can be either congenital or acquired from trauma, infection or other medical conditions. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often used by healthcare professionals to assess the impact of a patient’s condition (and treatm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7733194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040378 |
_version_ | 1783622225567416320 |
---|---|
author | Leggett, Heather Scantlebury, Arabella Sharma, Hemant Hewitt, Catherine Harden, Melissa McDaid, Catriona |
author_facet | Leggett, Heather Scantlebury, Arabella Sharma, Hemant Hewitt, Catherine Harden, Melissa McDaid, Catriona |
author_sort | Leggett, Heather |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Lower limb conditions requiring reconstructive surgery can be either congenital or acquired from trauma, infection or other medical conditions. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often used by healthcare professionals to assess the impact of a patient’s condition (and treatment) on quality of life. However, we are not aware of any measures developed specifically for people requiring lower limb reconstructive surgery. Consequently, it is not clear the extent to which current PROMs accurately and specifically measure the outcomes that are important to these patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ‘PROLLIT’ (Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Lower Limb Reconstruction) involves three phases: to explore what is important to patients with regard to quality of life (phase 1), ascertain whether current measures adequately capture these experiences (phase 2) and if not begin, the development of a new PROM (phase 3). The population of interest is people requiring, undergoing or after undergoing reconstructive surgery for a lower limb condition. In this paper, we describe phase 1, which aims to develop a conceptual framework to identify and map what is important to this group with regard to social interactions, employment, perceived health and quality of life after condition onset/injury and throughout recovery. The conceptual framework will be developed through three steps: (step A) a qualitative evidence synthesis, (step B) a qualitative study with patients and staff to explore patient’s views and experiences of lower limb reconstructive surgery and (step C) a round table discussion with key stakeholders where findings from step A and step B will be brought together and used to finalise the conceptual framework. ETHICS CONSIDERATION AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted for the qualitative data collection (step B) from South Central Berkshire Research Ethics committee (REF:20/SC/0114). Findings from steps A and B will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication in academic journals, and presented at academic conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019139587. ISRCTN REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN75201623. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7733194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77331942020-12-21 Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework Leggett, Heather Scantlebury, Arabella Sharma, Hemant Hewitt, Catherine Harden, Melissa McDaid, Catriona BMJ Open Qualitative Research INTRODUCTION: Lower limb conditions requiring reconstructive surgery can be either congenital or acquired from trauma, infection or other medical conditions. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often used by healthcare professionals to assess the impact of a patient’s condition (and treatment) on quality of life. However, we are not aware of any measures developed specifically for people requiring lower limb reconstructive surgery. Consequently, it is not clear the extent to which current PROMs accurately and specifically measure the outcomes that are important to these patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ‘PROLLIT’ (Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Lower Limb Reconstruction) involves three phases: to explore what is important to patients with regard to quality of life (phase 1), ascertain whether current measures adequately capture these experiences (phase 2) and if not begin, the development of a new PROM (phase 3). The population of interest is people requiring, undergoing or after undergoing reconstructive surgery for a lower limb condition. In this paper, we describe phase 1, which aims to develop a conceptual framework to identify and map what is important to this group with regard to social interactions, employment, perceived health and quality of life after condition onset/injury and throughout recovery. The conceptual framework will be developed through three steps: (step A) a qualitative evidence synthesis, (step B) a qualitative study with patients and staff to explore patient’s views and experiences of lower limb reconstructive surgery and (step C) a round table discussion with key stakeholders where findings from step A and step B will be brought together and used to finalise the conceptual framework. ETHICS CONSIDERATION AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted for the qualitative data collection (step B) from South Central Berkshire Research Ethics committee (REF:20/SC/0114). Findings from steps A and B will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication in academic journals, and presented at academic conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019139587. ISRCTN REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN75201623. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7733194/ /pubmed/33303449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040378 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Qualitative Research Leggett, Heather Scantlebury, Arabella Sharma, Hemant Hewitt, Catherine Harden, Melissa McDaid, Catriona Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework |
title | Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework |
title_full | Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework |
title_fullStr | Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework |
title_short | Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework |
title_sort | quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework |
topic | Qualitative Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7733194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040378 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leggettheather qualityoflifefollowingalowerlimbreconstructiveprocedureaprotocolforthedevelopmentofaconceptualframework AT scantleburyarabella qualityoflifefollowingalowerlimbreconstructiveprocedureaprotocolforthedevelopmentofaconceptualframework AT sharmahemant qualityoflifefollowingalowerlimbreconstructiveprocedureaprotocolforthedevelopmentofaconceptualframework AT hewittcatherine qualityoflifefollowingalowerlimbreconstructiveprocedureaprotocolforthedevelopmentofaconceptualframework AT hardenmelissa qualityoflifefollowingalowerlimbreconstructiveprocedureaprotocolforthedevelopmentofaconceptualframework AT mcdaidcatriona qualityoflifefollowingalowerlimbreconstructiveprocedureaprotocolforthedevelopmentofaconceptualframework AT qualityoflifefollowingalowerlimbreconstructiveprocedureaprotocolforthedevelopmentofaconceptualframework |