Cargando…
Priority allocation of pandemic influenza vaccines in Australia – Recommendations of 3 community juries
BACKGROUND: Pandemic planning has historically been oriented to respond to an influenza virus, with vaccination strategy being a key focus. As the current COVID-19 pandemic plays out, the Australian government is closely monitoring progress towards development of SARS-CoV2 vaccines as a definitive i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7733601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33317870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.010 |
_version_ | 1783622306062401536 |
---|---|
author | Degeling, C. Williams, J. Carter, S.M. Moss, R. Massey, P. Gilbert, G.L. Shih, P. Braunack-Mayer, A. Crooks, K. Brown, D. McVernon, J. |
author_facet | Degeling, C. Williams, J. Carter, S.M. Moss, R. Massey, P. Gilbert, G.L. Shih, P. Braunack-Mayer, A. Crooks, K. Brown, D. McVernon, J. |
author_sort | Degeling, C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pandemic planning has historically been oriented to respond to an influenza virus, with vaccination strategy being a key focus. As the current COVID-19 pandemic plays out, the Australian government is closely monitoring progress towards development of SARS-CoV2 vaccines as a definitive intervention. However, as in any pandemic, initial supply will likely be exceeded by demand due to limited manufacturing output. METHODS: We convened community juries in three Australian locations in 2019 to assess public acceptability and perceived legitimacy of influenza pandemic vaccination distribution strategies. Preparatory work included literature reviews on pandemic vaccine allocation strategies and on vaccine allocation ethics, and simulation modelling studies. We assumed vaccine would be provided to predefined priority groups. Jurors were then asked to recommend one of two strategies for distributing remaining early doses of vaccine: directly vaccinate people at higher risk of adverse outcomes from influenza; or indirectly protect the general population by vaccinating primary school students, who are most likely to spread infection. RESULTS: Thirty-four participants of diverse backgrounds and ages were recruited through random digit dialling and topic-blinded social media advertising. Juries heard evidence and arguments supporting different vaccine distribution strategies, and questioned expert presenters. All three community juries supported prioritising school children for influenza vaccination (aiming for indirect protection), one by 10–2 majority and two by consensus. Justifications included that indirect protection benefits more people and is likely to be more publicly acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of an influenza pandemic, informed citizens were not opposed to prioritising groups at higher risks of adverse outcomes, but if resources and epidemiological conditions allow, achieving population benefits should be a strategic priority. These insights may inform future SARS-CoV-2 vaccination strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7733601 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77336012020-12-14 Priority allocation of pandemic influenza vaccines in Australia – Recommendations of 3 community juries Degeling, C. Williams, J. Carter, S.M. Moss, R. Massey, P. Gilbert, G.L. Shih, P. Braunack-Mayer, A. Crooks, K. Brown, D. McVernon, J. Vaccine Article BACKGROUND: Pandemic planning has historically been oriented to respond to an influenza virus, with vaccination strategy being a key focus. As the current COVID-19 pandemic plays out, the Australian government is closely monitoring progress towards development of SARS-CoV2 vaccines as a definitive intervention. However, as in any pandemic, initial supply will likely be exceeded by demand due to limited manufacturing output. METHODS: We convened community juries in three Australian locations in 2019 to assess public acceptability and perceived legitimacy of influenza pandemic vaccination distribution strategies. Preparatory work included literature reviews on pandemic vaccine allocation strategies and on vaccine allocation ethics, and simulation modelling studies. We assumed vaccine would be provided to predefined priority groups. Jurors were then asked to recommend one of two strategies for distributing remaining early doses of vaccine: directly vaccinate people at higher risk of adverse outcomes from influenza; or indirectly protect the general population by vaccinating primary school students, who are most likely to spread infection. RESULTS: Thirty-four participants of diverse backgrounds and ages were recruited through random digit dialling and topic-blinded social media advertising. Juries heard evidence and arguments supporting different vaccine distribution strategies, and questioned expert presenters. All three community juries supported prioritising school children for influenza vaccination (aiming for indirect protection), one by 10–2 majority and two by consensus. Justifications included that indirect protection benefits more people and is likely to be more publicly acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of an influenza pandemic, informed citizens were not opposed to prioritising groups at higher risks of adverse outcomes, but if resources and epidemiological conditions allow, achieving population benefits should be a strategic priority. These insights may inform future SARS-CoV-2 vaccination strategies. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-01-08 2020-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7733601/ /pubmed/33317870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.010 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Degeling, C. Williams, J. Carter, S.M. Moss, R. Massey, P. Gilbert, G.L. Shih, P. Braunack-Mayer, A. Crooks, K. Brown, D. McVernon, J. Priority allocation of pandemic influenza vaccines in Australia – Recommendations of 3 community juries |
title | Priority allocation of pandemic influenza vaccines in Australia – Recommendations of 3 community juries |
title_full | Priority allocation of pandemic influenza vaccines in Australia – Recommendations of 3 community juries |
title_fullStr | Priority allocation of pandemic influenza vaccines in Australia – Recommendations of 3 community juries |
title_full_unstemmed | Priority allocation of pandemic influenza vaccines in Australia – Recommendations of 3 community juries |
title_short | Priority allocation of pandemic influenza vaccines in Australia – Recommendations of 3 community juries |
title_sort | priority allocation of pandemic influenza vaccines in australia – recommendations of 3 community juries |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7733601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33317870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degelingc priorityallocationofpandemicinfluenzavaccinesinaustraliarecommendationsof3communityjuries AT williamsj priorityallocationofpandemicinfluenzavaccinesinaustraliarecommendationsof3communityjuries AT cartersm priorityallocationofpandemicinfluenzavaccinesinaustraliarecommendationsof3communityjuries AT mossr priorityallocationofpandemicinfluenzavaccinesinaustraliarecommendationsof3communityjuries AT masseyp priorityallocationofpandemicinfluenzavaccinesinaustraliarecommendationsof3communityjuries AT gilbertgl priorityallocationofpandemicinfluenzavaccinesinaustraliarecommendationsof3communityjuries AT shihp priorityallocationofpandemicinfluenzavaccinesinaustraliarecommendationsof3communityjuries AT braunackmayera priorityallocationofpandemicinfluenzavaccinesinaustraliarecommendationsof3communityjuries AT crooksk priorityallocationofpandemicinfluenzavaccinesinaustraliarecommendationsof3communityjuries AT brownd priorityallocationofpandemicinfluenzavaccinesinaustraliarecommendationsof3communityjuries AT mcvernonj priorityallocationofpandemicinfluenzavaccinesinaustraliarecommendationsof3communityjuries |