Cargando…

Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions

Percutaneous coronary intervention, which is safe, effective, and timely, has become an important treatment for coronary artery diseases and has been widely used in clinical practice. However, there are still some problems that urgently need to be solved. Permanent vessel caging through metallic imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Xiang, Qu, Wenbo, Jia, Ying, Wang, Yani, Yu, Bo, Tian, Jinwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7733966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330651
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.589571
_version_ 1783622371766173696
author Peng, Xiang
Qu, Wenbo
Jia, Ying
Wang, Yani
Yu, Bo
Tian, Jinwei
author_facet Peng, Xiang
Qu, Wenbo
Jia, Ying
Wang, Yani
Yu, Bo
Tian, Jinwei
author_sort Peng, Xiang
collection PubMed
description Percutaneous coronary intervention, which is safe, effective, and timely, has become an important treatment for coronary artery diseases and has been widely used in clinical practice. However, there are still some problems that urgently need to be solved. Permanent vessel caging through metallic implants not only prevents the process of positive vessel remodeling and the restoration of vascular physiology but also makes the future revascularization of target vessels more difficult. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) have been developed as a potential solution to avoid the above adverse reactions caused by permanent metallic devices. BRSs provide temporary support to the vessel wall in the short term and then gradually degrade over time to restore the natural state of coronary arteries. Nonetheless, long-term follow-up of large-scale trials has drawn considerable attention to the safety of BRSs, and the significantly increased risk of late scaffold thrombosis (ScT) limits its clinical application. In this review, we summarize the current status and clinical experiences of BRSs to understand the application prospects and limitations of these devices. In addition, we focus on ScT after implantation, as it is currently the primary drawback of BRS. We also analyze the causes of ScT and discuss improvements required to overcome this serious drawback and to move the field forward.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7733966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77339662020-12-15 Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions Peng, Xiang Qu, Wenbo Jia, Ying Wang, Yani Yu, Bo Tian, Jinwei Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Percutaneous coronary intervention, which is safe, effective, and timely, has become an important treatment for coronary artery diseases and has been widely used in clinical practice. However, there are still some problems that urgently need to be solved. Permanent vessel caging through metallic implants not only prevents the process of positive vessel remodeling and the restoration of vascular physiology but also makes the future revascularization of target vessels more difficult. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) have been developed as a potential solution to avoid the above adverse reactions caused by permanent metallic devices. BRSs provide temporary support to the vessel wall in the short term and then gradually degrade over time to restore the natural state of coronary arteries. Nonetheless, long-term follow-up of large-scale trials has drawn considerable attention to the safety of BRSs, and the significantly increased risk of late scaffold thrombosis (ScT) limits its clinical application. In this review, we summarize the current status and clinical experiences of BRSs to understand the application prospects and limitations of these devices. In addition, we focus on ScT after implantation, as it is currently the primary drawback of BRS. We also analyze the causes of ScT and discuss improvements required to overcome this serious drawback and to move the field forward. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7733966/ /pubmed/33330651 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.589571 Text en Copyright © 2020 Peng, Qu, Jia, Wang, Yu and Tian. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Peng, Xiang
Qu, Wenbo
Jia, Ying
Wang, Yani
Yu, Bo
Tian, Jinwei
Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions
title Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions
title_full Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions
title_fullStr Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions
title_full_unstemmed Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions
title_short Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions
title_sort bioresorbable scaffolds: contemporary status and future directions
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7733966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330651
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.589571
work_keys_str_mv AT pengxiang bioresorbablescaffoldscontemporarystatusandfuturedirections
AT quwenbo bioresorbablescaffoldscontemporarystatusandfuturedirections
AT jiaying bioresorbablescaffoldscontemporarystatusandfuturedirections
AT wangyani bioresorbablescaffoldscontemporarystatusandfuturedirections
AT yubo bioresorbablescaffoldscontemporarystatusandfuturedirections
AT tianjinwei bioresorbablescaffoldscontemporarystatusandfuturedirections