Cargando…

Inhibition of Escherichia coli invasion into bovine mammary epithelial cells previously infected by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis

BACKGROUND: The coinfection process of Escherichia coli, an etiological agent of clinical mastitis and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP), a non-mastitic etiological agent in the bovine mammary gland is not fully known. OBJECTIVE: Verify the ability of MAP to interfere with the invasi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwarz, David Germano G., Pena, Junnia L., Carvalho, Isabel A., Silva Júnior, Abelardo, Moreira, Maria Aparecida S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31939335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2020.1716278
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The coinfection process of Escherichia coli, an etiological agent of clinical mastitis and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP), a non-mastitic etiological agent in the bovine mammary gland is not fully known. OBJECTIVE: Verify the ability of MAP to interfere with the invasion and translocation of E. coli in bovine mammary epithelial cell line (MAC-T). METHODS: For the invasion assay, MAC-T cells were challenged with MAP K10 for 2 h and then challenged with E. coli for 10, 30 and 120 min. For the translocation assay, the trans well plates were used and the challenge sequence was repeated as previously described. The amount of E. coli in the assays was determined by counting colony forming units (CFU) in Luria-Bertani medium. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to quantify MAP in MAC-T cells. To verify the viability of the MAC-T cells, the MTT assay was performed. MAP culture supernatant was also evaluated at different percentages for E. coli growth. RESULTS: Previous MAP infection in MAC-T cells inhibited E. coli invasion in 10, 30 and 120 min. No significant interference of MAP in the translocation of E. coli from the apical-basal direction was verified. Quantity of MAP DNA inside the MAC-T cells was statistically similar. Neither reduction in MAC-T cells viability was detected during the experiment nor MAP-released factor in the supernatant inhibited E. coli invasion. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that MAP-positive cows could be more resistant to E. coli infection, but when infected, could rapidly translocate E. coli to the subepithelial region.