Cargando…

Evaluation of nine serological rapid tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2

OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the operative capacity of nine serological rapid tests to detect the IgM/IgG antibodies response in serum from patients with SARS-CoV-2 in different clinical stages. METHODS. A cross-sectional study of serological rapid tests was designed to compare the performance of the eval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mercado, Marcela, Malagón-Rojas, Jeadran, Delgado, Gabriela, Rubio, Vivian Vanesa, Muñoz Galindo, Lida, Parra Barrera, Eliana L., Gaviria, Paula, Zabaleta, Gabriela, Alarcon, Zonia, Arévalo, Adriana, Cifuentes, Helly Casallas, Estrada, Kelly, Puerto, Gloria, Herrera Sepúlveda, María T., Rodríguez, Helena, Galindo, Marisol, Ospina Ramírez, Martha Lucía
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Organización Panamericana de la Salud 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734239/
http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.149
_version_ 1783622431942901760
author Mercado, Marcela
Malagón-Rojas, Jeadran
Delgado, Gabriela
Rubio, Vivian Vanesa
Muñoz Galindo, Lida
Parra Barrera, Eliana L.
Gaviria, Paula
Zabaleta, Gabriela
Alarcon, Zonia
Arévalo, Adriana
Cifuentes, Helly Casallas
Estrada, Kelly
Puerto, Gloria
Herrera Sepúlveda, María T.
Rodríguez, Helena
Galindo, Marisol
Ospina Ramírez, Martha Lucía
author_facet Mercado, Marcela
Malagón-Rojas, Jeadran
Delgado, Gabriela
Rubio, Vivian Vanesa
Muñoz Galindo, Lida
Parra Barrera, Eliana L.
Gaviria, Paula
Zabaleta, Gabriela
Alarcon, Zonia
Arévalo, Adriana
Cifuentes, Helly Casallas
Estrada, Kelly
Puerto, Gloria
Herrera Sepúlveda, María T.
Rodríguez, Helena
Galindo, Marisol
Ospina Ramírez, Martha Lucía
author_sort Mercado, Marcela
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the operative capacity of nine serological rapid tests to detect the IgM/IgG antibodies response in serum from patients with SARS-CoV-2 in different clinical stages. METHODS. A cross-sectional study of serological rapid tests was designed to compare the performance of the evaluated immunochromatographic tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. A total of 293 samples was used, including negatives, asymptomatic, and symptomatic serum samples. RESULTS. The sensitivity of the evaluated tests was low and moderate in the groups of asymptomatic serum samples and the group of serums coming from patients with less than 11 days since the onset of the symptoms. The specificity for the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies tests ranged between 86.5%-99% for IgM and 86.5%-99.5% for IgG. The sensitivity and the likelihood ratio were different according to the study groups. The usefulness of these tests is restricted to symptomatic patients and their sensitivity is greater than 85% after 11 days from the appearance of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS. Serological tests are not an adequate strategy for the identification of asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic patients. Serological rapid tests for the detection of specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies can be used as a diagnostic aid, but diagnosis must be confirmed by RT-PCR. Rapid tests should be reserved for patients with symptoms lasting more than 11 days.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7734239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Organización Panamericana de la Salud
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77342392020-12-15 Evaluation of nine serological rapid tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 Mercado, Marcela Malagón-Rojas, Jeadran Delgado, Gabriela Rubio, Vivian Vanesa Muñoz Galindo, Lida Parra Barrera, Eliana L. Gaviria, Paula Zabaleta, Gabriela Alarcon, Zonia Arévalo, Adriana Cifuentes, Helly Casallas Estrada, Kelly Puerto, Gloria Herrera Sepúlveda, María T. Rodríguez, Helena Galindo, Marisol Ospina Ramírez, Martha Lucía Rev Panam Salud Publica Original Research OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the operative capacity of nine serological rapid tests to detect the IgM/IgG antibodies response in serum from patients with SARS-CoV-2 in different clinical stages. METHODS. A cross-sectional study of serological rapid tests was designed to compare the performance of the evaluated immunochromatographic tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. A total of 293 samples was used, including negatives, asymptomatic, and symptomatic serum samples. RESULTS. The sensitivity of the evaluated tests was low and moderate in the groups of asymptomatic serum samples and the group of serums coming from patients with less than 11 days since the onset of the symptoms. The specificity for the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies tests ranged between 86.5%-99% for IgM and 86.5%-99.5% for IgG. The sensitivity and the likelihood ratio were different according to the study groups. The usefulness of these tests is restricted to symptomatic patients and their sensitivity is greater than 85% after 11 days from the appearance of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS. Serological tests are not an adequate strategy for the identification of asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic patients. Serological rapid tests for the detection of specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies can be used as a diagnostic aid, but diagnosis must be confirmed by RT-PCR. Rapid tests should be reserved for patients with symptoms lasting more than 11 days. Organización Panamericana de la Salud 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7734239/ http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.149 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/legalcode This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 IGO License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. No modifications or commercial use of this article are permitted. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that PAHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the PAHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mercado, Marcela
Malagón-Rojas, Jeadran
Delgado, Gabriela
Rubio, Vivian Vanesa
Muñoz Galindo, Lida
Parra Barrera, Eliana L.
Gaviria, Paula
Zabaleta, Gabriela
Alarcon, Zonia
Arévalo, Adriana
Cifuentes, Helly Casallas
Estrada, Kelly
Puerto, Gloria
Herrera Sepúlveda, María T.
Rodríguez, Helena
Galindo, Marisol
Ospina Ramírez, Martha Lucía
Evaluation of nine serological rapid tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
title Evaluation of nine serological rapid tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_full Evaluation of nine serological rapid tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Evaluation of nine serological rapid tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of nine serological rapid tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_short Evaluation of nine serological rapid tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_sort evaluation of nine serological rapid tests for the detection of sars-cov-2
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734239/
http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.149
work_keys_str_mv AT mercadomarcela evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT malagonrojasjeadran evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT delgadogabriela evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT rubiovivianvanesa evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT munozgalindolida evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT parrabarreraelianal evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT gaviriapaula evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT zabaletagabriela evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT alarconzonia evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT arevaloadriana evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT cifuenteshellycasallas evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT estradakelly evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT puertogloria evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT herrerasepulvedamariat evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT rodriguezhelena evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT galindomarisol evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2
AT ospinaramirezmarthalucia evaluationofnineserologicalrapidtestsforthedetectionofsarscov2