Cargando…

Blockchain technologies to mitigate COVID-19 challenges: A scoping review

Background: As public health strategists and policymakers explore different approaches to lessen the devastating effects of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), blockchain technology has emerged as a resource that can be utilized in numerous ways. Many blockchain technologies have been proposed or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abd-alrazaq, Alaa A., Alajlani, Mohannad, Alhuwail, Dari, Erbad, Aiman, Giannicchi, Anna, Shah, Zubair, Hamdi, Mounir, Househ, Mowafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2020.100001
_version_ 1783622471521402880
author Abd-alrazaq, Alaa A.
Alajlani, Mohannad
Alhuwail, Dari
Erbad, Aiman
Giannicchi, Anna
Shah, Zubair
Hamdi, Mounir
Househ, Mowafa
author_facet Abd-alrazaq, Alaa A.
Alajlani, Mohannad
Alhuwail, Dari
Erbad, Aiman
Giannicchi, Anna
Shah, Zubair
Hamdi, Mounir
Househ, Mowafa
author_sort Abd-alrazaq, Alaa A.
collection PubMed
description Background: As public health strategists and policymakers explore different approaches to lessen the devastating effects of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), blockchain technology has emerged as a resource that can be utilized in numerous ways. Many blockchain technologies have been proposed or implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, to the best of our knowledge, no comprehensive reviews have been conducted to uncover and summarise the main feature of these technologies. Objective: This study aims to explore proposed or implemented blockchain technologies used to mitigate the COVID-19 challenges as reported in the literature. Methods: We conducted a scoping review in line with guidelines of PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). To identify relevant studies, we searched 11 bibliographic databases (e.g., EMBASE and MEDLINE) and conducted backward and forward reference list checking of the included studies and relevant reviews. The study selection and data extraction were conducted by 2 reviewers independently. Data extracted from the included studies was narratively summarised and described. Results: 19 of 225 retrieved studies met eligibility criteria in this review. The included studies reported 10 used cases of blockchain to mitigate COVID-19 challenges; the most prominent use cases were contact tracing and immunity passports. While the blockchain technology was developed in 10 studies, its use was proposed in the remaining 9 studies. The public blockchain technology was the most commonly utilized type in the included studies. All together, 8 different consensus mechanisms were used in the included studies. Out of 10 studies that identified the used platform, 9 studies used Ethereum to run the blockchain. Solidity was the most prominent programming language used in developing blockchain technology in the included studies. The transaction cost was reported in only 4 of the included studies and varied between USD 10(−10) and USD 5. The expected latency and expected scalability were not identified in the included studies. Conclusion: Blockchain technologies are expected to play an integral role in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. Many possible applications of blockchain were found in this review; however, most of them are not mature enough to reveal their expected impact in the fight against COVID-19. We encourage governments, health authorities, and policymakers to consider all blockchain applications suggested in the current review to combat COVID-19 challenges. There is a pressing need to empirically examine how effective blockchain technologies are in mitigating COVID-19 challenges. Further studies are required to assess the performance of blockchain technologies’ fight against COVID-19 in terms of transaction cost, scalability, and/or latency when using different consensus algorithms, platforms, and access types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7734436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77344362020-12-14 Blockchain technologies to mitigate COVID-19 challenges: A scoping review Abd-alrazaq, Alaa A. Alajlani, Mohannad Alhuwail, Dari Erbad, Aiman Giannicchi, Anna Shah, Zubair Hamdi, Mounir Househ, Mowafa Comput Methods Programs Biomed Update Article Background: As public health strategists and policymakers explore different approaches to lessen the devastating effects of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), blockchain technology has emerged as a resource that can be utilized in numerous ways. Many blockchain technologies have been proposed or implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, to the best of our knowledge, no comprehensive reviews have been conducted to uncover and summarise the main feature of these technologies. Objective: This study aims to explore proposed or implemented blockchain technologies used to mitigate the COVID-19 challenges as reported in the literature. Methods: We conducted a scoping review in line with guidelines of PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). To identify relevant studies, we searched 11 bibliographic databases (e.g., EMBASE and MEDLINE) and conducted backward and forward reference list checking of the included studies and relevant reviews. The study selection and data extraction were conducted by 2 reviewers independently. Data extracted from the included studies was narratively summarised and described. Results: 19 of 225 retrieved studies met eligibility criteria in this review. The included studies reported 10 used cases of blockchain to mitigate COVID-19 challenges; the most prominent use cases were contact tracing and immunity passports. While the blockchain technology was developed in 10 studies, its use was proposed in the remaining 9 studies. The public blockchain technology was the most commonly utilized type in the included studies. All together, 8 different consensus mechanisms were used in the included studies. Out of 10 studies that identified the used platform, 9 studies used Ethereum to run the blockchain. Solidity was the most prominent programming language used in developing blockchain technology in the included studies. The transaction cost was reported in only 4 of the included studies and varied between USD 10(−10) and USD 5. The expected latency and expected scalability were not identified in the included studies. Conclusion: Blockchain technologies are expected to play an integral role in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. Many possible applications of blockchain were found in this review; however, most of them are not mature enough to reveal their expected impact in the fight against COVID-19. We encourage governments, health authorities, and policymakers to consider all blockchain applications suggested in the current review to combat COVID-19 challenges. There is a pressing need to empirically examine how effective blockchain technologies are in mitigating COVID-19 challenges. Further studies are required to assess the performance of blockchain technologies’ fight against COVID-19 in terms of transaction cost, scalability, and/or latency when using different consensus algorithms, platforms, and access types. The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2021 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7734436/ /pubmed/34337586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2020.100001 Text en © 2020 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Abd-alrazaq, Alaa A.
Alajlani, Mohannad
Alhuwail, Dari
Erbad, Aiman
Giannicchi, Anna
Shah, Zubair
Hamdi, Mounir
Househ, Mowafa
Blockchain technologies to mitigate COVID-19 challenges: A scoping review
title Blockchain technologies to mitigate COVID-19 challenges: A scoping review
title_full Blockchain technologies to mitigate COVID-19 challenges: A scoping review
title_fullStr Blockchain technologies to mitigate COVID-19 challenges: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Blockchain technologies to mitigate COVID-19 challenges: A scoping review
title_short Blockchain technologies to mitigate COVID-19 challenges: A scoping review
title_sort blockchain technologies to mitigate covid-19 challenges: a scoping review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2020.100001
work_keys_str_mv AT abdalrazaqalaaa blockchaintechnologiestomitigatecovid19challengesascopingreview
AT alajlanimohannad blockchaintechnologiestomitigatecovid19challengesascopingreview
AT alhuwaildari blockchaintechnologiestomitigatecovid19challengesascopingreview
AT erbadaiman blockchaintechnologiestomitigatecovid19challengesascopingreview
AT giannicchianna blockchaintechnologiestomitigatecovid19challengesascopingreview
AT shahzubair blockchaintechnologiestomitigatecovid19challengesascopingreview
AT hamdimounir blockchaintechnologiestomitigatecovid19challengesascopingreview
AT househmowafa blockchaintechnologiestomitigatecovid19challengesascopingreview