Cargando…
Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the parameters with a significant impact on delivery quality assurance (DQA) failure and analyze the planning parameters as possible predictors of DQA failure for helical tomotherapy. METHODS: In total, 212 patients who passed or failed DQA measurements were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033820979692 |
_version_ | 1783622479346925568 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Kyung Hwan Lee, Young Hyun Park, Byung Hun Han, Min Cheol Kim, Jihun Kim, Hojin Cho, Min-Seok Kang, Hyokyeong Lee, Ho Kim, Dong Wook Park, Kwangwoo Cho, Jaeho Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Jin Sung Hong, Chae-Seon |
author_facet | Chang, Kyung Hwan Lee, Young Hyun Park, Byung Hun Han, Min Cheol Kim, Jihun Kim, Hojin Cho, Min-Seok Kang, Hyokyeong Lee, Ho Kim, Dong Wook Park, Kwangwoo Cho, Jaeho Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Jin Sung Hong, Chae-Seon |
author_sort | Chang, Kyung Hwan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the parameters with a significant impact on delivery quality assurance (DQA) failure and analyze the planning parameters as possible predictors of DQA failure for helical tomotherapy. METHODS: In total, 212 patients who passed or failed DQA measurements were retrospectively included in this study. Brain (n = 43), head and neck (n = 37), spinal (n = 12), prostate (n = 36), rectal (n = 36), pelvis (n = 13), cranial spinal irradiation and a treatment field including lymph nodes (n = 24), and other types of cancer (n = 11) were selected. The correlation between DQA results and treatment planning parameters were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, areas under the curves (AUCs), and the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) algorithm were used to analyze treatment planning parameters as possible predictors for DQA failure. RESULTS: The AUC for leaf open time (LOT) was 0.70, and its cut-off point was approximately 30%. The ROC curve for the predicted probability calculated when the multivariate variable model was applied showed an AUC of 0.815. We confirmed that total monitor units, total dose, and LOT were significant predictors for DQA failure using the CART. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of DQA failure was higher when the percentage of LOT below 100 ms was higher than 30%. The percentage of LOT below 100 ms should be considered in the treatment planning process. The findings from this study may assist in the prediction of DQA failure in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7734483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77344832020-12-21 Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy Chang, Kyung Hwan Lee, Young Hyun Park, Byung Hun Han, Min Cheol Kim, Jihun Kim, Hojin Cho, Min-Seok Kang, Hyokyeong Lee, Ho Kim, Dong Wook Park, Kwangwoo Cho, Jaeho Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Jin Sung Hong, Chae-Seon Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the parameters with a significant impact on delivery quality assurance (DQA) failure and analyze the planning parameters as possible predictors of DQA failure for helical tomotherapy. METHODS: In total, 212 patients who passed or failed DQA measurements were retrospectively included in this study. Brain (n = 43), head and neck (n = 37), spinal (n = 12), prostate (n = 36), rectal (n = 36), pelvis (n = 13), cranial spinal irradiation and a treatment field including lymph nodes (n = 24), and other types of cancer (n = 11) were selected. The correlation between DQA results and treatment planning parameters were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, areas under the curves (AUCs), and the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) algorithm were used to analyze treatment planning parameters as possible predictors for DQA failure. RESULTS: The AUC for leaf open time (LOT) was 0.70, and its cut-off point was approximately 30%. The ROC curve for the predicted probability calculated when the multivariate variable model was applied showed an AUC of 0.815. We confirmed that total monitor units, total dose, and LOT were significant predictors for DQA failure using the CART. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of DQA failure was higher when the percentage of LOT below 100 ms was higher than 30%. The percentage of LOT below 100 ms should be considered in the treatment planning process. The findings from this study may assist in the prediction of DQA failure in the future. SAGE Publications 2020-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7734483/ /pubmed/33302821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033820979692 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chang, Kyung Hwan Lee, Young Hyun Park, Byung Hun Han, Min Cheol Kim, Jihun Kim, Hojin Cho, Min-Seok Kang, Hyokyeong Lee, Ho Kim, Dong Wook Park, Kwangwoo Cho, Jaeho Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Jin Sung Hong, Chae-Seon Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy |
title | Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy |
title_full | Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy |
title_fullStr | Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy |
title_short | Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy |
title_sort | statistical analysis of treatment planning parameters for prediction of delivery quality assurance failure for helical tomotherapy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033820979692 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changkyunghwan statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy AT leeyounghyun statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy AT parkbyunghun statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy AT hanmincheol statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy AT kimjihun statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy AT kimhojin statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy AT chominseok statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy AT kanghyokyeong statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy AT leeho statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy AT kimdongwook statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy AT parkkwangwoo statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy AT chojaeho statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy AT kimyongbae statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy AT kimjinsung statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy AT hongchaeseon statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy |