Cargando…

Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the parameters with a significant impact on delivery quality assurance (DQA) failure and analyze the planning parameters as possible predictors of DQA failure for helical tomotherapy. METHODS: In total, 212 patients who passed or failed DQA measurements were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Kyung Hwan, Lee, Young Hyun, Park, Byung Hun, Han, Min Cheol, Kim, Jihun, Kim, Hojin, Cho, Min-Seok, Kang, Hyokyeong, Lee, Ho, Kim, Dong Wook, Park, Kwangwoo, Cho, Jaeho, Kim, Yong Bae, Kim, Jin Sung, Hong, Chae-Seon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033820979692
_version_ 1783622479346925568
author Chang, Kyung Hwan
Lee, Young Hyun
Park, Byung Hun
Han, Min Cheol
Kim, Jihun
Kim, Hojin
Cho, Min-Seok
Kang, Hyokyeong
Lee, Ho
Kim, Dong Wook
Park, Kwangwoo
Cho, Jaeho
Kim, Yong Bae
Kim, Jin Sung
Hong, Chae-Seon
author_facet Chang, Kyung Hwan
Lee, Young Hyun
Park, Byung Hun
Han, Min Cheol
Kim, Jihun
Kim, Hojin
Cho, Min-Seok
Kang, Hyokyeong
Lee, Ho
Kim, Dong Wook
Park, Kwangwoo
Cho, Jaeho
Kim, Yong Bae
Kim, Jin Sung
Hong, Chae-Seon
author_sort Chang, Kyung Hwan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the parameters with a significant impact on delivery quality assurance (DQA) failure and analyze the planning parameters as possible predictors of DQA failure for helical tomotherapy. METHODS: In total, 212 patients who passed or failed DQA measurements were retrospectively included in this study. Brain (n = 43), head and neck (n = 37), spinal (n = 12), prostate (n = 36), rectal (n = 36), pelvis (n = 13), cranial spinal irradiation and a treatment field including lymph nodes (n = 24), and other types of cancer (n = 11) were selected. The correlation between DQA results and treatment planning parameters were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, areas under the curves (AUCs), and the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) algorithm were used to analyze treatment planning parameters as possible predictors for DQA failure. RESULTS: The AUC for leaf open time (LOT) was 0.70, and its cut-off point was approximately 30%. The ROC curve for the predicted probability calculated when the multivariate variable model was applied showed an AUC of 0.815. We confirmed that total monitor units, total dose, and LOT were significant predictors for DQA failure using the CART. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of DQA failure was higher when the percentage of LOT below 100 ms was higher than 30%. The percentage of LOT below 100 ms should be considered in the treatment planning process. The findings from this study may assist in the prediction of DQA failure in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7734483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77344832020-12-21 Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy Chang, Kyung Hwan Lee, Young Hyun Park, Byung Hun Han, Min Cheol Kim, Jihun Kim, Hojin Cho, Min-Seok Kang, Hyokyeong Lee, Ho Kim, Dong Wook Park, Kwangwoo Cho, Jaeho Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Jin Sung Hong, Chae-Seon Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the parameters with a significant impact on delivery quality assurance (DQA) failure and analyze the planning parameters as possible predictors of DQA failure for helical tomotherapy. METHODS: In total, 212 patients who passed or failed DQA measurements were retrospectively included in this study. Brain (n = 43), head and neck (n = 37), spinal (n = 12), prostate (n = 36), rectal (n = 36), pelvis (n = 13), cranial spinal irradiation and a treatment field including lymph nodes (n = 24), and other types of cancer (n = 11) were selected. The correlation between DQA results and treatment planning parameters were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, areas under the curves (AUCs), and the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) algorithm were used to analyze treatment planning parameters as possible predictors for DQA failure. RESULTS: The AUC for leaf open time (LOT) was 0.70, and its cut-off point was approximately 30%. The ROC curve for the predicted probability calculated when the multivariate variable model was applied showed an AUC of 0.815. We confirmed that total monitor units, total dose, and LOT were significant predictors for DQA failure using the CART. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of DQA failure was higher when the percentage of LOT below 100 ms was higher than 30%. The percentage of LOT below 100 ms should be considered in the treatment planning process. The findings from this study may assist in the prediction of DQA failure in the future. SAGE Publications 2020-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7734483/ /pubmed/33302821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033820979692 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Chang, Kyung Hwan
Lee, Young Hyun
Park, Byung Hun
Han, Min Cheol
Kim, Jihun
Kim, Hojin
Cho, Min-Seok
Kang, Hyokyeong
Lee, Ho
Kim, Dong Wook
Park, Kwangwoo
Cho, Jaeho
Kim, Yong Bae
Kim, Jin Sung
Hong, Chae-Seon
Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy
title Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy
title_full Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy
title_fullStr Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy
title_short Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy
title_sort statistical analysis of treatment planning parameters for prediction of delivery quality assurance failure for helical tomotherapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033820979692
work_keys_str_mv AT changkyunghwan statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy
AT leeyounghyun statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy
AT parkbyunghun statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy
AT hanmincheol statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy
AT kimjihun statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy
AT kimhojin statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy
AT chominseok statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy
AT kanghyokyeong statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy
AT leeho statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy
AT kimdongwook statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy
AT parkkwangwoo statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy
AT chojaeho statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy
AT kimyongbae statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy
AT kimjinsung statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy
AT hongchaeseon statisticalanalysisoftreatmentplanningparametersforpredictionofdeliveryqualityassurancefailureforhelicaltomotherapy