Cargando…

Protocol for randomized controlled trial of electric stimulation with high-volt twin peak versus placebo for facial functional recovery from acute Bell’s palsy in patients with poor prognostic factors

BACKGROUND: Electric stimulation (ES) can prevent muscle atrophy and promote tissue healing and therefore may help prevent sequelae of Bell’s palsy but due to lack of high-quality studies, the effectiveness of ES in Bell’s palsy remains controversial. Here we describe a protocol to evaluate the effe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loyo, Myriam, McReynold, Margaret, Mace, Jess C, Cameron, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33354350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668320964142
_version_ 1783622482193809408
author Loyo, Myriam
McReynold, Margaret
Mace, Jess C
Cameron, Michelle
author_facet Loyo, Myriam
McReynold, Margaret
Mace, Jess C
Cameron, Michelle
author_sort Loyo, Myriam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electric stimulation (ES) can prevent muscle atrophy and promote tissue healing and therefore may help prevent sequelae of Bell’s palsy but due to lack of high-quality studies, the effectiveness of ES in Bell’s palsy remains controversial. Here we describe a protocol to evaluate the effects of monophasic high volt ES in patients with Bell’s palsy and poor prognosis for recovery. RESULTS: This is a protocol for a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Participants include adults with acute Bell’s palsy with poor prognosis for full recovery due to complete paralysis or being over age 60. ES will be a monophasic, high-volt pulsed waveform, 100μsec pulse duration, 35 hertz, motor-level intensity. Follow up will be at months 1, 2, 3 and 6. The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients with complete recovery using the eFACES tool. Secondary outcomes include patient reported quality of life measured by FaCE and the synkinesis assessment questionnaires, objective photographs, time to complete recovery, adverse effects, and tolerability. CONCLUSION: This protocol has the potential to provide high quality evidence regarding the effects, up to 6 months after onset, of pulsed monophasic high-volt ES for patients with acute Bell’s palsy and poor prognosis for complete recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7734495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77344952020-12-21 Protocol for randomized controlled trial of electric stimulation with high-volt twin peak versus placebo for facial functional recovery from acute Bell’s palsy in patients with poor prognostic factors Loyo, Myriam McReynold, Margaret Mace, Jess C Cameron, Michelle J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng Original Article BACKGROUND: Electric stimulation (ES) can prevent muscle atrophy and promote tissue healing and therefore may help prevent sequelae of Bell’s palsy but due to lack of high-quality studies, the effectiveness of ES in Bell’s palsy remains controversial. Here we describe a protocol to evaluate the effects of monophasic high volt ES in patients with Bell’s palsy and poor prognosis for recovery. RESULTS: This is a protocol for a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Participants include adults with acute Bell’s palsy with poor prognosis for full recovery due to complete paralysis or being over age 60. ES will be a monophasic, high-volt pulsed waveform, 100μsec pulse duration, 35 hertz, motor-level intensity. Follow up will be at months 1, 2, 3 and 6. The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients with complete recovery using the eFACES tool. Secondary outcomes include patient reported quality of life measured by FaCE and the synkinesis assessment questionnaires, objective photographs, time to complete recovery, adverse effects, and tolerability. CONCLUSION: This protocol has the potential to provide high quality evidence regarding the effects, up to 6 months after onset, of pulsed monophasic high-volt ES for patients with acute Bell’s palsy and poor prognosis for complete recovery. SAGE Publications 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7734495/ /pubmed/33354350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668320964142 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Loyo, Myriam
McReynold, Margaret
Mace, Jess C
Cameron, Michelle
Protocol for randomized controlled trial of electric stimulation with high-volt twin peak versus placebo for facial functional recovery from acute Bell’s palsy in patients with poor prognostic factors
title Protocol for randomized controlled trial of electric stimulation with high-volt twin peak versus placebo for facial functional recovery from acute Bell’s palsy in patients with poor prognostic factors
title_full Protocol for randomized controlled trial of electric stimulation with high-volt twin peak versus placebo for facial functional recovery from acute Bell’s palsy in patients with poor prognostic factors
title_fullStr Protocol for randomized controlled trial of electric stimulation with high-volt twin peak versus placebo for facial functional recovery from acute Bell’s palsy in patients with poor prognostic factors
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for randomized controlled trial of electric stimulation with high-volt twin peak versus placebo for facial functional recovery from acute Bell’s palsy in patients with poor prognostic factors
title_short Protocol for randomized controlled trial of electric stimulation with high-volt twin peak versus placebo for facial functional recovery from acute Bell’s palsy in patients with poor prognostic factors
title_sort protocol for randomized controlled trial of electric stimulation with high-volt twin peak versus placebo for facial functional recovery from acute bell’s palsy in patients with poor prognostic factors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33354350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668320964142
work_keys_str_mv AT loyomyriam protocolforrandomizedcontrolledtrialofelectricstimulationwithhighvolttwinpeakversusplaceboforfacialfunctionalrecoveryfromacutebellspalsyinpatientswithpoorprognosticfactors
AT mcreynoldmargaret protocolforrandomizedcontrolledtrialofelectricstimulationwithhighvolttwinpeakversusplaceboforfacialfunctionalrecoveryfromacutebellspalsyinpatientswithpoorprognosticfactors
AT macejessc protocolforrandomizedcontrolledtrialofelectricstimulationwithhighvolttwinpeakversusplaceboforfacialfunctionalrecoveryfromacutebellspalsyinpatientswithpoorprognosticfactors
AT cameronmichelle protocolforrandomizedcontrolledtrialofelectricstimulationwithhighvolttwinpeakversusplaceboforfacialfunctionalrecoveryfromacutebellspalsyinpatientswithpoorprognosticfactors