Cargando…

Investigation of opposition to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in older people hospitalized in acute geriatric services: the OPTAH pilot study protocol

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is a process that involves collaborative discussions between a patient and a care team to ensure informed healthcare decisions. This process becomes more complex when the older person’s decision-making capacities are affected. In these situations, surrogate decisio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tannou, Thomas, Trimaille, Hélène, Mathieu-Nicot, Florence, Koeberle, Séverine, Aubry, Régis, Godard-Marceau, Aurélie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33308277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00742-7
_version_ 1783622527232245760
author Tannou, Thomas
Trimaille, Hélène
Mathieu-Nicot, Florence
Koeberle, Séverine
Aubry, Régis
Godard-Marceau, Aurélie
author_facet Tannou, Thomas
Trimaille, Hélène
Mathieu-Nicot, Florence
Koeberle, Séverine
Aubry, Régis
Godard-Marceau, Aurélie
author_sort Tannou, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is a process that involves collaborative discussions between a patient and a care team to ensure informed healthcare decisions. This process becomes more complex when the older person’s decision-making capacities are affected. In these situations, surrogate decision-making processes are used to define a person-centered care plan. Despite these processes, the implementation of the care plan defined in the best interest of the patient may nevertheless be rejected by the patient, particularly in cases of neurocognitive disorders or delirium. This concept of opposition and/or refusal is frequently used in research. This is not yet well understood in the medical literature, and there is a lack of consensus on its definition. We, therefore, explored this concept by defining opposition to diagnostic or therapeutic proposals. METHOD: Our pilot study protocol is based on a mixed methodology (epidemiological and qualitative research) to quantify this phenomenon, validate the proposed definition, and explore its core elements. Opposition and refusal of care will be quantified, and semi-structured interviews will be conducted with patients, their relatives, and referring carers. Multidisciplinary meetings that will be associated with these situations will also be observed and analyzed. Methodological approaches that can be used to explore opposition and refusal of care in a scientific, reproducible framework are presented. This methodology considers the specificities of the geriatric, polypathological population with neurocognitive disorders. DISCUSSION: Opposition and refusal of care are key concepts in clinical research on ethics, particularly in the geriatric field. These concepts are frequently mentioned in studies involving older patients but have not been specifically defined or studied. This study would undoubtedly lead to greater awareness among professional caregivers and relatives of the significance of such opposition, and more respectful interactions in these complex hospitalization cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03373838. Registered on 14 December 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7734746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77347462020-12-15 Investigation of opposition to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in older people hospitalized in acute geriatric services: the OPTAH pilot study protocol Tannou, Thomas Trimaille, Hélène Mathieu-Nicot, Florence Koeberle, Séverine Aubry, Régis Godard-Marceau, Aurélie Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is a process that involves collaborative discussions between a patient and a care team to ensure informed healthcare decisions. This process becomes more complex when the older person’s decision-making capacities are affected. In these situations, surrogate decision-making processes are used to define a person-centered care plan. Despite these processes, the implementation of the care plan defined in the best interest of the patient may nevertheless be rejected by the patient, particularly in cases of neurocognitive disorders or delirium. This concept of opposition and/or refusal is frequently used in research. This is not yet well understood in the medical literature, and there is a lack of consensus on its definition. We, therefore, explored this concept by defining opposition to diagnostic or therapeutic proposals. METHOD: Our pilot study protocol is based on a mixed methodology (epidemiological and qualitative research) to quantify this phenomenon, validate the proposed definition, and explore its core elements. Opposition and refusal of care will be quantified, and semi-structured interviews will be conducted with patients, their relatives, and referring carers. Multidisciplinary meetings that will be associated with these situations will also be observed and analyzed. Methodological approaches that can be used to explore opposition and refusal of care in a scientific, reproducible framework are presented. This methodology considers the specificities of the geriatric, polypathological population with neurocognitive disorders. DISCUSSION: Opposition and refusal of care are key concepts in clinical research on ethics, particularly in the geriatric field. These concepts are frequently mentioned in studies involving older patients but have not been specifically defined or studied. This study would undoubtedly lead to greater awareness among professional caregivers and relatives of the significance of such opposition, and more respectful interactions in these complex hospitalization cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03373838. Registered on 14 December 2017. BioMed Central 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7734746/ /pubmed/33308277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00742-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Tannou, Thomas
Trimaille, Hélène
Mathieu-Nicot, Florence
Koeberle, Séverine
Aubry, Régis
Godard-Marceau, Aurélie
Investigation of opposition to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in older people hospitalized in acute geriatric services: the OPTAH pilot study protocol
title Investigation of opposition to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in older people hospitalized in acute geriatric services: the OPTAH pilot study protocol
title_full Investigation of opposition to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in older people hospitalized in acute geriatric services: the OPTAH pilot study protocol
title_fullStr Investigation of opposition to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in older people hospitalized in acute geriatric services: the OPTAH pilot study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of opposition to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in older people hospitalized in acute geriatric services: the OPTAH pilot study protocol
title_short Investigation of opposition to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in older people hospitalized in acute geriatric services: the OPTAH pilot study protocol
title_sort investigation of opposition to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in older people hospitalized in acute geriatric services: the optah pilot study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33308277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00742-7
work_keys_str_mv AT tannouthomas investigationofoppositiontodiagnosticortherapeuticproceduresinolderpeoplehospitalizedinacutegeriatricservicestheoptahpilotstudyprotocol
AT trimaillehelene investigationofoppositiontodiagnosticortherapeuticproceduresinolderpeoplehospitalizedinacutegeriatricservicestheoptahpilotstudyprotocol
AT mathieunicotflorence investigationofoppositiontodiagnosticortherapeuticproceduresinolderpeoplehospitalizedinacutegeriatricservicestheoptahpilotstudyprotocol
AT koeberleseverine investigationofoppositiontodiagnosticortherapeuticproceduresinolderpeoplehospitalizedinacutegeriatricservicestheoptahpilotstudyprotocol
AT aubryregis investigationofoppositiontodiagnosticortherapeuticproceduresinolderpeoplehospitalizedinacutegeriatricservicestheoptahpilotstudyprotocol
AT godardmarceauaurelie investigationofoppositiontodiagnosticortherapeuticproceduresinolderpeoplehospitalizedinacutegeriatricservicestheoptahpilotstudyprotocol