Cargando…

Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses

BACKGROUND: Crystalloids and different component colloids, used for volume resuscitation, are sometimes associated with various adverse effects. Clinical trial findings for such fluid types in different patients’ conditions are conflicting. Whether the mortality benefit of balanced crystalloid than...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tseng, Chien-Hua, Chen, Tzu-Tao, Wu, Mei-Yi, Chan, Ming-Cheng, Shih, Ming-Chieh, Tu, Yu-Kang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33317590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03419-y
_version_ 1783622546516606976
author Tseng, Chien-Hua
Chen, Tzu-Tao
Wu, Mei-Yi
Chan, Ming-Cheng
Shih, Ming-Chieh
Tu, Yu-Kang
author_facet Tseng, Chien-Hua
Chen, Tzu-Tao
Wu, Mei-Yi
Chan, Ming-Cheng
Shih, Ming-Chieh
Tu, Yu-Kang
author_sort Tseng, Chien-Hua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Crystalloids and different component colloids, used for volume resuscitation, are sometimes associated with various adverse effects. Clinical trial findings for such fluid types in different patients’ conditions are conflicting. Whether the mortality benefit of balanced crystalloid than saline can be inferred from sepsis to other patient group is uncertain, and adverse effect profile is not comprehensive. This study aims to compare the survival benefits and adverse effects of seven fluid types with network meta-analysis in sepsis, surgical, trauma, and traumatic brain injury patients. METHODS: Searched databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL) and reference lists of relevant articles occurred from inception until January 2020. Studies on critically ill adults requiring fluid resuscitation were included. Intervention studies reported on balanced crystalloid, saline, iso-oncotic albumin, hyperoncotic albumin, low molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch (L-HES), high molecular weight HES, and gelatin. Network meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects model to calculate odds ratio (OR) and mean difference. Risk of Bias tool 2.0 was used to assess bias. Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) web application was used to rate confidence in synthetic evidence. RESULTS: Fifty-eight trials (n = 26,351 patients) were identified. Seven fluid types were evaluated. Among patients with sepsis and surgery, balanced crystalloids and albumin achieved better survival, fewer acute kidney injury, and smaller blood transfusion volumes than saline and L-HES. In those with sepsis, balanced crystalloids significantly reduced mortality more than saline (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74–0.95) and L-HES (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.69–0.95) and reduced acute kidney injury more than L-HES (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65–0.99). However, they required the greatest resuscitation volume among all fluid types, especially in trauma patients. In patients with traumatic brain injury, saline and L-HES achieved lower mortality than albumin and balanced crystalloids; especially saline was significantly superior to iso-oncotic albumin (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35–0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Our network meta-analysis found that balanced crystalloids and albumin decreased mortality more than L-HES and saline in sepsis patients; however, saline or L-HES was better than iso-oncotic albumin or balanced crystalloids in traumatic brain injury patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO website, registration number: CRD42018115641).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7734863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77348632020-12-15 Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses Tseng, Chien-Hua Chen, Tzu-Tao Wu, Mei-Yi Chan, Ming-Cheng Shih, Ming-Chieh Tu, Yu-Kang Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Crystalloids and different component colloids, used for volume resuscitation, are sometimes associated with various adverse effects. Clinical trial findings for such fluid types in different patients’ conditions are conflicting. Whether the mortality benefit of balanced crystalloid than saline can be inferred from sepsis to other patient group is uncertain, and adverse effect profile is not comprehensive. This study aims to compare the survival benefits and adverse effects of seven fluid types with network meta-analysis in sepsis, surgical, trauma, and traumatic brain injury patients. METHODS: Searched databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL) and reference lists of relevant articles occurred from inception until January 2020. Studies on critically ill adults requiring fluid resuscitation were included. Intervention studies reported on balanced crystalloid, saline, iso-oncotic albumin, hyperoncotic albumin, low molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch (L-HES), high molecular weight HES, and gelatin. Network meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects model to calculate odds ratio (OR) and mean difference. Risk of Bias tool 2.0 was used to assess bias. Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) web application was used to rate confidence in synthetic evidence. RESULTS: Fifty-eight trials (n = 26,351 patients) were identified. Seven fluid types were evaluated. Among patients with sepsis and surgery, balanced crystalloids and albumin achieved better survival, fewer acute kidney injury, and smaller blood transfusion volumes than saline and L-HES. In those with sepsis, balanced crystalloids significantly reduced mortality more than saline (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74–0.95) and L-HES (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.69–0.95) and reduced acute kidney injury more than L-HES (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65–0.99). However, they required the greatest resuscitation volume among all fluid types, especially in trauma patients. In patients with traumatic brain injury, saline and L-HES achieved lower mortality than albumin and balanced crystalloids; especially saline was significantly superior to iso-oncotic albumin (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35–0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Our network meta-analysis found that balanced crystalloids and albumin decreased mortality more than L-HES and saline in sepsis patients; however, saline or L-HES was better than iso-oncotic albumin or balanced crystalloids in traumatic brain injury patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO website, registration number: CRD42018115641). BioMed Central 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7734863/ /pubmed/33317590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03419-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tseng, Chien-Hua
Chen, Tzu-Tao
Wu, Mei-Yi
Chan, Ming-Cheng
Shih, Ming-Chieh
Tu, Yu-Kang
Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses
title Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses
title_full Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses
title_fullStr Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses
title_full_unstemmed Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses
title_short Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses
title_sort resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33317590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03419-y
work_keys_str_mv AT tsengchienhua resuscitationfluidtypesinsepsissurgicalandtraumapatientsasystematicreviewandsequentialnetworkmetaanalyses
AT chentzutao resuscitationfluidtypesinsepsissurgicalandtraumapatientsasystematicreviewandsequentialnetworkmetaanalyses
AT wumeiyi resuscitationfluidtypesinsepsissurgicalandtraumapatientsasystematicreviewandsequentialnetworkmetaanalyses
AT chanmingcheng resuscitationfluidtypesinsepsissurgicalandtraumapatientsasystematicreviewandsequentialnetworkmetaanalyses
AT shihmingchieh resuscitationfluidtypesinsepsissurgicalandtraumapatientsasystematicreviewandsequentialnetworkmetaanalyses
AT tuyukang resuscitationfluidtypesinsepsissurgicalandtraumapatientsasystematicreviewandsequentialnetworkmetaanalyses