Cargando…

Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates

Pharmaceutical applicants conduct (Q)SAR assessments on identified and theoretical impurities to predict their mutagenic potential. Two complementary models—one rule-based and one statistical-based—are used, followed by expert review. (Q)SAR models are continuously updated to improve predictions, wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasselgren, Catrin, Bercu, Joel, Cayley, Alex, Cross, Kevin, Glowienke, Susanne, Kruhlak, Naomi, Muster, Wolfgang, Nicolette, John, Reddy, M. Vijayaraj, Saiakhov, Roustem, Dobo, Krista
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33058939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104807
_version_ 1783622547628097536
author Hasselgren, Catrin
Bercu, Joel
Cayley, Alex
Cross, Kevin
Glowienke, Susanne
Kruhlak, Naomi
Muster, Wolfgang
Nicolette, John
Reddy, M. Vijayaraj
Saiakhov, Roustem
Dobo, Krista
author_facet Hasselgren, Catrin
Bercu, Joel
Cayley, Alex
Cross, Kevin
Glowienke, Susanne
Kruhlak, Naomi
Muster, Wolfgang
Nicolette, John
Reddy, M. Vijayaraj
Saiakhov, Roustem
Dobo, Krista
author_sort Hasselgren, Catrin
collection PubMed
description Pharmaceutical applicants conduct (Q)SAR assessments on identified and theoretical impurities to predict their mutagenic potential. Two complementary models—one rule-based and one statistical-based—are used, followed by expert review. (Q)SAR models are continuously updated to improve predictions, with new versions typically released on a yearly basis. Numerous releases of (Q)SAR models will occur during the typical 6–7 years of drug development until new drug registration. Therefore, it is important to understand the impact of model updates on impurity mutagenicity predictions over time. Compounds representative of pharmaceutical impurities were analyzed with three rule- and three statistical-based models covering a 4–8 year period, with the individual time frame being dependent on when the individual models were initially made available. The largest changes in the combined outcome of two complementary models were from positive or equivocal to negative and from negative to equivocal. Importantly, the cumulative change of negative to positive predictions was small in all models (<5%) and was further reduced when complementary models were combined in a consensus fashion. We conclude that model updates of the type evaluated in this manuscript would not necessarily require re-running a (Q)SAR prediction unless there is a specific need. However, original (Q)SAR predictions should be evaluated when finalizing the commercial route of synthesis for marketing authorization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7734868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77348682020-12-14 Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates Hasselgren, Catrin Bercu, Joel Cayley, Alex Cross, Kevin Glowienke, Susanne Kruhlak, Naomi Muster, Wolfgang Nicolette, John Reddy, M. Vijayaraj Saiakhov, Roustem Dobo, Krista Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Article Pharmaceutical applicants conduct (Q)SAR assessments on identified and theoretical impurities to predict their mutagenic potential. Two complementary models—one rule-based and one statistical-based—are used, followed by expert review. (Q)SAR models are continuously updated to improve predictions, with new versions typically released on a yearly basis. Numerous releases of (Q)SAR models will occur during the typical 6–7 years of drug development until new drug registration. Therefore, it is important to understand the impact of model updates on impurity mutagenicity predictions over time. Compounds representative of pharmaceutical impurities were analyzed with three rule- and three statistical-based models covering a 4–8 year period, with the individual time frame being dependent on when the individual models were initially made available. The largest changes in the combined outcome of two complementary models were from positive or equivocal to negative and from negative to equivocal. Importantly, the cumulative change of negative to positive predictions was small in all models (<5%) and was further reduced when complementary models were combined in a consensus fashion. We conclude that model updates of the type evaluated in this manuscript would not necessarily require re-running a (Q)SAR prediction unless there is a specific need. However, original (Q)SAR predictions should be evaluated when finalizing the commercial route of synthesis for marketing authorization. 2020-10-13 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7734868/ /pubmed/33058939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104807 Text en This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hasselgren, Catrin
Bercu, Joel
Cayley, Alex
Cross, Kevin
Glowienke, Susanne
Kruhlak, Naomi
Muster, Wolfgang
Nicolette, John
Reddy, M. Vijayaraj
Saiakhov, Roustem
Dobo, Krista
Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates
title Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates
title_full Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates
title_fullStr Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates
title_full_unstemmed Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates
title_short Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates
title_sort management of pharmaceutical ich m7 (q)sar predictions – the impact of model updates
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33058939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104807
work_keys_str_mv AT hasselgrencatrin managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates
AT bercujoel managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates
AT cayleyalex managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates
AT crosskevin managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates
AT glowienkesusanne managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates
AT kruhlaknaomi managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates
AT musterwolfgang managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates
AT nicolettejohn managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates
AT reddymvijayaraj managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates
AT saiakhovroustem managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates
AT dobokrista managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates