Cargando…
Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates
Pharmaceutical applicants conduct (Q)SAR assessments on identified and theoretical impurities to predict their mutagenic potential. Two complementary models—one rule-based and one statistical-based—are used, followed by expert review. (Q)SAR models are continuously updated to improve predictions, wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33058939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104807 |
_version_ | 1783622547628097536 |
---|---|
author | Hasselgren, Catrin Bercu, Joel Cayley, Alex Cross, Kevin Glowienke, Susanne Kruhlak, Naomi Muster, Wolfgang Nicolette, John Reddy, M. Vijayaraj Saiakhov, Roustem Dobo, Krista |
author_facet | Hasselgren, Catrin Bercu, Joel Cayley, Alex Cross, Kevin Glowienke, Susanne Kruhlak, Naomi Muster, Wolfgang Nicolette, John Reddy, M. Vijayaraj Saiakhov, Roustem Dobo, Krista |
author_sort | Hasselgren, Catrin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pharmaceutical applicants conduct (Q)SAR assessments on identified and theoretical impurities to predict their mutagenic potential. Two complementary models—one rule-based and one statistical-based—are used, followed by expert review. (Q)SAR models are continuously updated to improve predictions, with new versions typically released on a yearly basis. Numerous releases of (Q)SAR models will occur during the typical 6–7 years of drug development until new drug registration. Therefore, it is important to understand the impact of model updates on impurity mutagenicity predictions over time. Compounds representative of pharmaceutical impurities were analyzed with three rule- and three statistical-based models covering a 4–8 year period, with the individual time frame being dependent on when the individual models were initially made available. The largest changes in the combined outcome of two complementary models were from positive or equivocal to negative and from negative to equivocal. Importantly, the cumulative change of negative to positive predictions was small in all models (<5%) and was further reduced when complementary models were combined in a consensus fashion. We conclude that model updates of the type evaluated in this manuscript would not necessarily require re-running a (Q)SAR prediction unless there is a specific need. However, original (Q)SAR predictions should be evaluated when finalizing the commercial route of synthesis for marketing authorization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7734868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77348682020-12-14 Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates Hasselgren, Catrin Bercu, Joel Cayley, Alex Cross, Kevin Glowienke, Susanne Kruhlak, Naomi Muster, Wolfgang Nicolette, John Reddy, M. Vijayaraj Saiakhov, Roustem Dobo, Krista Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Article Pharmaceutical applicants conduct (Q)SAR assessments on identified and theoretical impurities to predict their mutagenic potential. Two complementary models—one rule-based and one statistical-based—are used, followed by expert review. (Q)SAR models are continuously updated to improve predictions, with new versions typically released on a yearly basis. Numerous releases of (Q)SAR models will occur during the typical 6–7 years of drug development until new drug registration. Therefore, it is important to understand the impact of model updates on impurity mutagenicity predictions over time. Compounds representative of pharmaceutical impurities were analyzed with three rule- and three statistical-based models covering a 4–8 year period, with the individual time frame being dependent on when the individual models were initially made available. The largest changes in the combined outcome of two complementary models were from positive or equivocal to negative and from negative to equivocal. Importantly, the cumulative change of negative to positive predictions was small in all models (<5%) and was further reduced when complementary models were combined in a consensus fashion. We conclude that model updates of the type evaluated in this manuscript would not necessarily require re-running a (Q)SAR prediction unless there is a specific need. However, original (Q)SAR predictions should be evaluated when finalizing the commercial route of synthesis for marketing authorization. 2020-10-13 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7734868/ /pubmed/33058939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104807 Text en This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hasselgren, Catrin Bercu, Joel Cayley, Alex Cross, Kevin Glowienke, Susanne Kruhlak, Naomi Muster, Wolfgang Nicolette, John Reddy, M. Vijayaraj Saiakhov, Roustem Dobo, Krista Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates |
title | Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates |
title_full | Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates |
title_fullStr | Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates |
title_short | Management of pharmaceutical ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions – The impact of model updates |
title_sort | management of pharmaceutical ich m7 (q)sar predictions – the impact of model updates |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33058939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104807 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hasselgrencatrin managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates AT bercujoel managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates AT cayleyalex managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates AT crosskevin managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates AT glowienkesusanne managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates AT kruhlaknaomi managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates AT musterwolfgang managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates AT nicolettejohn managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates AT reddymvijayaraj managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates AT saiakhovroustem managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates AT dobokrista managementofpharmaceuticalichm7qsarpredictionstheimpactofmodelupdates |