Cargando…

Comparison of Modified Meek Technique with Standard Mesh Method in Patients with Third Degree Burns

BACKGROUND: Covering burn wounds, especially high surface area burns has been always a challenge for surgeons. The Meek technique has been introduced to increase the covering area. There is paucity of clinical trials comparing the Meek technique and mesh in the same individuals to assess it efficacy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dahmardehei, Mostafa, Vaghardoost, Reza, Saboury, Mahdy, Zarei, Hamze, Saboury, Shahriar, Molaei, Mehdi, Seyyedi, Jalal, Maleknejad, Abdulbaset
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330002
http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.3.267
_version_ 1783622560131317760
author Dahmardehei, Mostafa
Vaghardoost, Reza
Saboury, Mahdy
Zarei, Hamze
Saboury, Shahriar
Molaei, Mehdi
Seyyedi, Jalal
Maleknejad, Abdulbaset
author_facet Dahmardehei, Mostafa
Vaghardoost, Reza
Saboury, Mahdy
Zarei, Hamze
Saboury, Shahriar
Molaei, Mehdi
Seyyedi, Jalal
Maleknejad, Abdulbaset
author_sort Dahmardehei, Mostafa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Covering burn wounds, especially high surface area burns has been always a challenge for surgeons. The Meek technique has been introduced to increase the covering area. There is paucity of clinical trials comparing the Meek technique and mesh in the same individuals to assess it efficacy. METHODS: In a case-control study, 20 patients with grade III burns who underwent the Meek technique and mesh in different areas/limbs were enrolled. Expansion rate, re-epithelization, operation time, wound infection, graft failure, etc. were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among patients, 18 were males and 2 were females. The mean of total body surface area (TBSA) was 36.9±16.6%. Mean time of re-epithelialization in the Meek group was 2.8±2.5 months and in the mesh group was 5.0±2.1 months (p=0.01). Operation time was shorter in modified Meek technique (p=0.04). Expansion ratio was higher in modified Meek technique (p=0.04). Local wound infection rates were slightly different without a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: Meek technique provided higher surface area coverage in comparison to mesh; in addition to faster re-epithelization. Therefore, it is recommended to consider the Meek technique as a routine procedure, especially those with high surface area burns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7734932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77349322020-12-15 Comparison of Modified Meek Technique with Standard Mesh Method in Patients with Third Degree Burns Dahmardehei, Mostafa Vaghardoost, Reza Saboury, Mahdy Zarei, Hamze Saboury, Shahriar Molaei, Mehdi Seyyedi, Jalal Maleknejad, Abdulbaset World J Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Covering burn wounds, especially high surface area burns has been always a challenge for surgeons. The Meek technique has been introduced to increase the covering area. There is paucity of clinical trials comparing the Meek technique and mesh in the same individuals to assess it efficacy. METHODS: In a case-control study, 20 patients with grade III burns who underwent the Meek technique and mesh in different areas/limbs were enrolled. Expansion rate, re-epithelization, operation time, wound infection, graft failure, etc. were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among patients, 18 were males and 2 were females. The mean of total body surface area (TBSA) was 36.9±16.6%. Mean time of re-epithelialization in the Meek group was 2.8±2.5 months and in the mesh group was 5.0±2.1 months (p=0.01). Operation time was shorter in modified Meek technique (p=0.04). Expansion ratio was higher in modified Meek technique (p=0.04). Local wound infection rates were slightly different without a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: Meek technique provided higher surface area coverage in comparison to mesh; in addition to faster re-epithelization. Therefore, it is recommended to consider the Meek technique as a routine procedure, especially those with high surface area burns. Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7734932/ /pubmed/33330002 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.3.267 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dahmardehei, Mostafa
Vaghardoost, Reza
Saboury, Mahdy
Zarei, Hamze
Saboury, Shahriar
Molaei, Mehdi
Seyyedi, Jalal
Maleknejad, Abdulbaset
Comparison of Modified Meek Technique with Standard Mesh Method in Patients with Third Degree Burns
title Comparison of Modified Meek Technique with Standard Mesh Method in Patients with Third Degree Burns
title_full Comparison of Modified Meek Technique with Standard Mesh Method in Patients with Third Degree Burns
title_fullStr Comparison of Modified Meek Technique with Standard Mesh Method in Patients with Third Degree Burns
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Modified Meek Technique with Standard Mesh Method in Patients with Third Degree Burns
title_short Comparison of Modified Meek Technique with Standard Mesh Method in Patients with Third Degree Burns
title_sort comparison of modified meek technique with standard mesh method in patients with third degree burns
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330002
http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.3.267
work_keys_str_mv AT dahmardeheimostafa comparisonofmodifiedmeektechniquewithstandardmeshmethodinpatientswiththirddegreeburns
AT vaghardoostreza comparisonofmodifiedmeektechniquewithstandardmeshmethodinpatientswiththirddegreeburns
AT sabourymahdy comparisonofmodifiedmeektechniquewithstandardmeshmethodinpatientswiththirddegreeburns
AT zareihamze comparisonofmodifiedmeektechniquewithstandardmeshmethodinpatientswiththirddegreeburns
AT sabouryshahriar comparisonofmodifiedmeektechniquewithstandardmeshmethodinpatientswiththirddegreeburns
AT molaeimehdi comparisonofmodifiedmeektechniquewithstandardmeshmethodinpatientswiththirddegreeburns
AT seyyedijalal comparisonofmodifiedmeektechniquewithstandardmeshmethodinpatientswiththirddegreeburns
AT maleknejadabdulbaset comparisonofmodifiedmeektechniquewithstandardmeshmethodinpatientswiththirddegreeburns