Cargando…

Impact of obstetric unit closures, travel time and distance to obstetric services on maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-income countries: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review (1) The effect of obstetric unit (OU) closures on maternal and neonatal outcomes and (2) The association between travel distance/time to an OU and maternal and neonatal outcomes. DESIGN: Systematic review of any quantitative studies with a comparison group. DATA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malouf, Reem Saleem, Tomlinson, Claire, Henderson, Jane, Opondo, Charles, Brocklehurst, Peter, Alderdice, Fiona, Phalguni, Angaja, Dretzke, Janine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7735086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33318106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036852
_version_ 1783622593837793280
author Malouf, Reem Saleem
Tomlinson, Claire
Henderson, Jane
Opondo, Charles
Brocklehurst, Peter
Alderdice, Fiona
Phalguni, Angaja
Dretzke, Janine
author_facet Malouf, Reem Saleem
Tomlinson, Claire
Henderson, Jane
Opondo, Charles
Brocklehurst, Peter
Alderdice, Fiona
Phalguni, Angaja
Dretzke, Janine
author_sort Malouf, Reem Saleem
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To systematically review (1) The effect of obstetric unit (OU) closures on maternal and neonatal outcomes and (2) The association between travel distance/time to an OU and maternal and neonatal outcomes. DESIGN: Systematic review of any quantitative studies with a comparison group. DATA SOURCES: Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Applied Social Science Index and Abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health and grey literature were searched. METHODS: Eligible studies explored the impact of closure of an OU or the effect of travel distance/time on prespecified maternal or neonatal outcomes. Only studies of women giving birth in high-income countries with universal health coverage of maternity services comparable to the UK were included. Identification of studies, extraction of data and risk of bias assessment were undertaken by at least two reviewers independently. The risk of bias checklist was based on the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care criteria and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Heterogeneity across studies precluded meta-analysis and synthesis was narrative, with key findings tabulated. RESULTS: 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. There was some evidence to suggest an increase in babies born before arrival following OU closures and/or associated with longer travel distances or time. This may be associated with an increased risk of perinatal or neonatal mortality, but this finding was not consistent across studies. Evidence on other maternal and neonatal outcomes was limited but did not suggest worse outcomes after closures or with longer travel times/distances. Interpretation of findings for some studies was hampered by concerns around how accurately exposures were measured, and/or a lack of adjustment for confounders or temporal changes. CONCLUSION: It is not possible to conclude from this review whether OU closure, increased travel distances or times are associated with worse outcomes for the mother or the baby. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017078503.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7735086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77350862020-12-21 Impact of obstetric unit closures, travel time and distance to obstetric services on maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-income countries: a systematic review Malouf, Reem Saleem Tomlinson, Claire Henderson, Jane Opondo, Charles Brocklehurst, Peter Alderdice, Fiona Phalguni, Angaja Dretzke, Janine BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To systematically review (1) The effect of obstetric unit (OU) closures on maternal and neonatal outcomes and (2) The association between travel distance/time to an OU and maternal and neonatal outcomes. DESIGN: Systematic review of any quantitative studies with a comparison group. DATA SOURCES: Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Applied Social Science Index and Abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health and grey literature were searched. METHODS: Eligible studies explored the impact of closure of an OU or the effect of travel distance/time on prespecified maternal or neonatal outcomes. Only studies of women giving birth in high-income countries with universal health coverage of maternity services comparable to the UK were included. Identification of studies, extraction of data and risk of bias assessment were undertaken by at least two reviewers independently. The risk of bias checklist was based on the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care criteria and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Heterogeneity across studies precluded meta-analysis and synthesis was narrative, with key findings tabulated. RESULTS: 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. There was some evidence to suggest an increase in babies born before arrival following OU closures and/or associated with longer travel distances or time. This may be associated with an increased risk of perinatal or neonatal mortality, but this finding was not consistent across studies. Evidence on other maternal and neonatal outcomes was limited but did not suggest worse outcomes after closures or with longer travel times/distances. Interpretation of findings for some studies was hampered by concerns around how accurately exposures were measured, and/or a lack of adjustment for confounders or temporal changes. CONCLUSION: It is not possible to conclude from this review whether OU closure, increased travel distances or times are associated with worse outcomes for the mother or the baby. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017078503. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7735086/ /pubmed/33318106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036852 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Malouf, Reem Saleem
Tomlinson, Claire
Henderson, Jane
Opondo, Charles
Brocklehurst, Peter
Alderdice, Fiona
Phalguni, Angaja
Dretzke, Janine
Impact of obstetric unit closures, travel time and distance to obstetric services on maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-income countries: a systematic review
title Impact of obstetric unit closures, travel time and distance to obstetric services on maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-income countries: a systematic review
title_full Impact of obstetric unit closures, travel time and distance to obstetric services on maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-income countries: a systematic review
title_fullStr Impact of obstetric unit closures, travel time and distance to obstetric services on maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-income countries: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Impact of obstetric unit closures, travel time and distance to obstetric services on maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-income countries: a systematic review
title_short Impact of obstetric unit closures, travel time and distance to obstetric services on maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-income countries: a systematic review
title_sort impact of obstetric unit closures, travel time and distance to obstetric services on maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-income countries: a systematic review
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7735086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33318106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036852
work_keys_str_mv AT maloufreemsaleem impactofobstetricunitclosurestraveltimeanddistancetoobstetricservicesonmaternalandneonataloutcomesinhighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT tomlinsonclaire impactofobstetricunitclosurestraveltimeanddistancetoobstetricservicesonmaternalandneonataloutcomesinhighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT hendersonjane impactofobstetricunitclosurestraveltimeanddistancetoobstetricservicesonmaternalandneonataloutcomesinhighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT opondocharles impactofobstetricunitclosurestraveltimeanddistancetoobstetricservicesonmaternalandneonataloutcomesinhighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT brocklehurstpeter impactofobstetricunitclosurestraveltimeanddistancetoobstetricservicesonmaternalandneonataloutcomesinhighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT alderdicefiona impactofobstetricunitclosurestraveltimeanddistancetoobstetricservicesonmaternalandneonataloutcomesinhighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT phalguniangaja impactofobstetricunitclosurestraveltimeanddistancetoobstetricservicesonmaternalandneonataloutcomesinhighincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT dretzkejanine impactofobstetricunitclosurestraveltimeanddistancetoobstetricservicesonmaternalandneonataloutcomesinhighincomecountriesasystematicreview