Cargando…
Network comparison and the within-ensemble graph distance
Quantifying the differences between networks is a challenging and ever-present problem in network science. In recent years, a multitude of diverse, ad hoc solutions to this problem have been introduced. Here, we propose that simple and well-understood ensembles of random networks—such as Erdős–Rényi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7735290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33363435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0744 |
_version_ | 1783622620053241856 |
---|---|
author | Hartle, Harrison Klein, Brennan McCabe, Stefan Daniels, Alexander St-Onge, Guillaume Murphy, Charles Hébert-Dufresne, Laurent |
author_facet | Hartle, Harrison Klein, Brennan McCabe, Stefan Daniels, Alexander St-Onge, Guillaume Murphy, Charles Hébert-Dufresne, Laurent |
author_sort | Hartle, Harrison |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantifying the differences between networks is a challenging and ever-present problem in network science. In recent years, a multitude of diverse, ad hoc solutions to this problem have been introduced. Here, we propose that simple and well-understood ensembles of random networks—such as Erdős–Rényi graphs, random geometric graphs, Watts–Strogatz graphs, the configuration model and preferential attachment networks—are natural benchmarks for network comparison methods. Moreover, we show that the expected distance between two networks independently sampled from a generative model is a useful property that encapsulates many key features of that model. To illustrate our results, we calculate this within-ensemble graph distance and related quantities for classic network models (and several parameterizations thereof) using 20 distance measures commonly used to compare graphs. The within-ensemble graph distance provides a new framework for developers of graph distances to better understand their creations and for practitioners to better choose an appropriate tool for their particular task. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7735290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77352902020-12-23 Network comparison and the within-ensemble graph distance Hartle, Harrison Klein, Brennan McCabe, Stefan Daniels, Alexander St-Onge, Guillaume Murphy, Charles Hébert-Dufresne, Laurent Proc Math Phys Eng Sci Special Feature Quantifying the differences between networks is a challenging and ever-present problem in network science. In recent years, a multitude of diverse, ad hoc solutions to this problem have been introduced. Here, we propose that simple and well-understood ensembles of random networks—such as Erdős–Rényi graphs, random geometric graphs, Watts–Strogatz graphs, the configuration model and preferential attachment networks—are natural benchmarks for network comparison methods. Moreover, we show that the expected distance between two networks independently sampled from a generative model is a useful property that encapsulates many key features of that model. To illustrate our results, we calculate this within-ensemble graph distance and related quantities for classic network models (and several parameterizations thereof) using 20 distance measures commonly used to compare graphs. The within-ensemble graph distance provides a new framework for developers of graph distances to better understand their creations and for practitioners to better choose an appropriate tool for their particular task. The Royal Society Publishing 2020-11 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7735290/ /pubmed/33363435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0744 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Special Feature Hartle, Harrison Klein, Brennan McCabe, Stefan Daniels, Alexander St-Onge, Guillaume Murphy, Charles Hébert-Dufresne, Laurent Network comparison and the within-ensemble graph distance |
title | Network comparison and the within-ensemble graph distance |
title_full | Network comparison and the within-ensemble graph distance |
title_fullStr | Network comparison and the within-ensemble graph distance |
title_full_unstemmed | Network comparison and the within-ensemble graph distance |
title_short | Network comparison and the within-ensemble graph distance |
title_sort | network comparison and the within-ensemble graph distance |
topic | Special Feature |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7735290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33363435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0744 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hartleharrison networkcomparisonandthewithinensemblegraphdistance AT kleinbrennan networkcomparisonandthewithinensemblegraphdistance AT mccabestefan networkcomparisonandthewithinensemblegraphdistance AT danielsalexander networkcomparisonandthewithinensemblegraphdistance AT stongeguillaume networkcomparisonandthewithinensemblegraphdistance AT murphycharles networkcomparisonandthewithinensemblegraphdistance AT hebertdufresnelaurent networkcomparisonandthewithinensemblegraphdistance |