Cargando…

Convenience Comparison Study of Reconstitution Devices for the Blood Coagulation Factor VIII Products Rurioctocog Alfa Pegol and Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant)

INTRODUCTION: The Baxject(®) II Hi-Flow device has previously been used to reconstitute the factor VIII products antihemophilic factor (recombinant) (ADVATE(®)) and rurioctocog alfa pegol (ADYNOVATE(®)). METHODS: In this crossover study in healthy men, the convenience of an advanced device, Baxject...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ueda, Hitoshi, Toyoda, Misato, Arai, Morio, Sakai, Michio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7735796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328757
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S272251
_version_ 1783622703588048896
author Ueda, Hitoshi
Toyoda, Misato
Arai, Morio
Sakai, Michio
author_facet Ueda, Hitoshi
Toyoda, Misato
Arai, Morio
Sakai, Michio
author_sort Ueda, Hitoshi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Baxject(®) II Hi-Flow device has previously been used to reconstitute the factor VIII products antihemophilic factor (recombinant) (ADVATE(®)) and rurioctocog alfa pegol (ADYNOVATE(®)). METHODS: In this crossover study in healthy men, the convenience of an advanced device, Baxject III(®) with and without a nonslip sleeve, was compared with that of Baxject II Hi-Flow. The primary endpoint was the operational time for reconstitution; secondary endpoints included participants’ assessment of the usability of the devices for reconstitution and their preference for using each of the devices. RESULTS: Twelve healthy adult men (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age: 36.7 ± 7.0 years) and 12 healthy elderly men (mean ± SD age: 70.3 ± 4.8 years) participated in the study. In the adult group, the mean operational time for reconstitution was shorter using Baxject III (mean ± SD: 19.7 ± 2.7 and 19.9 ± 5.2 seconds with and without a nonslip sleeve, respectively) than when using Baxject II Hi-Flow (49.6 ± 7.2 seconds, P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Adult participants rated preference (P < 0.0001) and ease of reconstitution (P < 0.0001) as higher for Baxject III with a nonslip sleeve than for Baxject II Hi-Flow. Results were consistent regardless of age group or the use of the nonslip sleeve. CONCLUSION: Owing to the convenience of Baxject III, this device will improve the reconstitution process for patients with hemophilia treated with rurioctocog alfa pegol or antihemophilic factor (recombinant) at home.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7735796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77357962020-12-15 Convenience Comparison Study of Reconstitution Devices for the Blood Coagulation Factor VIII Products Rurioctocog Alfa Pegol and Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) Ueda, Hitoshi Toyoda, Misato Arai, Morio Sakai, Michio Int J Gen Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: The Baxject(®) II Hi-Flow device has previously been used to reconstitute the factor VIII products antihemophilic factor (recombinant) (ADVATE(®)) and rurioctocog alfa pegol (ADYNOVATE(®)). METHODS: In this crossover study in healthy men, the convenience of an advanced device, Baxject III(®) with and without a nonslip sleeve, was compared with that of Baxject II Hi-Flow. The primary endpoint was the operational time for reconstitution; secondary endpoints included participants’ assessment of the usability of the devices for reconstitution and their preference for using each of the devices. RESULTS: Twelve healthy adult men (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age: 36.7 ± 7.0 years) and 12 healthy elderly men (mean ± SD age: 70.3 ± 4.8 years) participated in the study. In the adult group, the mean operational time for reconstitution was shorter using Baxject III (mean ± SD: 19.7 ± 2.7 and 19.9 ± 5.2 seconds with and without a nonslip sleeve, respectively) than when using Baxject II Hi-Flow (49.6 ± 7.2 seconds, P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Adult participants rated preference (P < 0.0001) and ease of reconstitution (P < 0.0001) as higher for Baxject III with a nonslip sleeve than for Baxject II Hi-Flow. Results were consistent regardless of age group or the use of the nonslip sleeve. CONCLUSION: Owing to the convenience of Baxject III, this device will improve the reconstitution process for patients with hemophilia treated with rurioctocog alfa pegol or antihemophilic factor (recombinant) at home. Dove 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7735796/ /pubmed/33328757 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S272251 Text en © 2020 Ueda et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ueda, Hitoshi
Toyoda, Misato
Arai, Morio
Sakai, Michio
Convenience Comparison Study of Reconstitution Devices for the Blood Coagulation Factor VIII Products Rurioctocog Alfa Pegol and Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant)
title Convenience Comparison Study of Reconstitution Devices for the Blood Coagulation Factor VIII Products Rurioctocog Alfa Pegol and Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant)
title_full Convenience Comparison Study of Reconstitution Devices for the Blood Coagulation Factor VIII Products Rurioctocog Alfa Pegol and Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant)
title_fullStr Convenience Comparison Study of Reconstitution Devices for the Blood Coagulation Factor VIII Products Rurioctocog Alfa Pegol and Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant)
title_full_unstemmed Convenience Comparison Study of Reconstitution Devices for the Blood Coagulation Factor VIII Products Rurioctocog Alfa Pegol and Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant)
title_short Convenience Comparison Study of Reconstitution Devices for the Blood Coagulation Factor VIII Products Rurioctocog Alfa Pegol and Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant)
title_sort convenience comparison study of reconstitution devices for the blood coagulation factor viii products rurioctocog alfa pegol and antihemophilic factor (recombinant)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7735796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33328757
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S272251
work_keys_str_mv AT uedahitoshi conveniencecomparisonstudyofreconstitutiondevicesforthebloodcoagulationfactorviiiproductsrurioctocogalfapegolandantihemophilicfactorrecombinant
AT toyodamisato conveniencecomparisonstudyofreconstitutiondevicesforthebloodcoagulationfactorviiiproductsrurioctocogalfapegolandantihemophilicfactorrecombinant
AT araimorio conveniencecomparisonstudyofreconstitutiondevicesforthebloodcoagulationfactorviiiproductsrurioctocogalfapegolandantihemophilicfactorrecombinant
AT sakaimichio conveniencecomparisonstudyofreconstitutiondevicesforthebloodcoagulationfactorviiiproductsrurioctocogalfapegolandantihemophilicfactorrecombinant