Cargando…

Risk Factors for Intraprocedural Rerupture during Embolization of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND: Intraprocedural rupture (IPR) is a devastating complication in endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms, but its risk factors have not been fully assessed. This study was performed to explore the risk factors for IPR during embolization of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jun-Min, Chen, Qian-Xue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7735914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33316863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e430
_version_ 1783622726519357440
author Wang, Jun-Min
Chen, Qian-Xue
author_facet Wang, Jun-Min
Chen, Qian-Xue
author_sort Wang, Jun-Min
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intraprocedural rupture (IPR) is a devastating complication in endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms, but its risk factors have not been fully assessed. This study was performed to explore the risk factors for IPR during embolization of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. METHODS: A total of 1,494 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms who underwent endovascular interventional embolization were enrolled. Clinical characteristics were collected for each patient. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the factors independently associated with IPR. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the cutoff values of continuous variables predicting IPR. RESULTS: Forty-one patients suffered from IPR (2.7%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that aneurysm size (odds ratio [OR], 0.819; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.732–0.916), aneurysms with irregular morphology (OR, 2.162; 95% CI, 1.143–4.091), time from symptom onset to intervention (OR, 1.615; 95% CI, 1.207–2.161), and vasospasm during embolization (OR, 2.021; 95% CI, 1.038–3.934) were the independent risk factors of IPR. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for aneurysm size and time from onset to intervention were 0.697 (cutoff value, 3.4 mm; sensitivity, 78.8%; and specificity, 53.7%) and 0.659 (cutoff value, 2 days; sensitivity, 78.0%; and specificity, 45.2%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Aneurysms with irregular morphology, aneurysms ≤ 3.4 mm in diameter, time from onset to intervention > 2 days and cerebral vasospasm during embolization are independent risk factors for IPR during coil embolization of ruptured aneurysms. More attention should be paid to the factors increasing the risk of IPR in patients with ruptured aneurysms so as to minimize this complication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7735914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77359142020-12-21 Risk Factors for Intraprocedural Rerupture during Embolization of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Wang, Jun-Min Chen, Qian-Xue J Korean Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Intraprocedural rupture (IPR) is a devastating complication in endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms, but its risk factors have not been fully assessed. This study was performed to explore the risk factors for IPR during embolization of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. METHODS: A total of 1,494 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms who underwent endovascular interventional embolization were enrolled. Clinical characteristics were collected for each patient. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the factors independently associated with IPR. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the cutoff values of continuous variables predicting IPR. RESULTS: Forty-one patients suffered from IPR (2.7%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that aneurysm size (odds ratio [OR], 0.819; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.732–0.916), aneurysms with irregular morphology (OR, 2.162; 95% CI, 1.143–4.091), time from symptom onset to intervention (OR, 1.615; 95% CI, 1.207–2.161), and vasospasm during embolization (OR, 2.021; 95% CI, 1.038–3.934) were the independent risk factors of IPR. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for aneurysm size and time from onset to intervention were 0.697 (cutoff value, 3.4 mm; sensitivity, 78.8%; and specificity, 53.7%) and 0.659 (cutoff value, 2 days; sensitivity, 78.0%; and specificity, 45.2%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Aneurysms with irregular morphology, aneurysms ≤ 3.4 mm in diameter, time from onset to intervention > 2 days and cerebral vasospasm during embolization are independent risk factors for IPR during coil embolization of ruptured aneurysms. More attention should be paid to the factors increasing the risk of IPR in patients with ruptured aneurysms so as to minimize this complication. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2020-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7735914/ /pubmed/33316863 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e430 Text en © 2020 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wang, Jun-Min
Chen, Qian-Xue
Risk Factors for Intraprocedural Rerupture during Embolization of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
title Risk Factors for Intraprocedural Rerupture during Embolization of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
title_full Risk Factors for Intraprocedural Rerupture during Embolization of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
title_fullStr Risk Factors for Intraprocedural Rerupture during Embolization of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors for Intraprocedural Rerupture during Embolization of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
title_short Risk Factors for Intraprocedural Rerupture during Embolization of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
title_sort risk factors for intraprocedural rerupture during embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7735914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33316863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e430
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjunmin riskfactorsforintraproceduralreruptureduringembolizationofrupturedintracranialaneurysms
AT chenqianxue riskfactorsforintraproceduralreruptureduringembolizationofrupturedintracranialaneurysms