Cargando…
An Intersectional Analysis of COVID-19 Unemployment
Using the April 2020 Current Population Survey (CPS) micro dataset, we explore the racialized and gendered effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the probability of being unemployed. The distribution of the pandemic-induced job losses for women and men or for different racial/ethnic categories has been...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7735953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41996-020-00075-w |
_version_ | 1783622731772723200 |
---|---|
author | Gezici, Armagan Ozay, Ozge |
author_facet | Gezici, Armagan Ozay, Ozge |
author_sort | Gezici, Armagan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Using the April 2020 Current Population Survey (CPS) micro dataset, we explore the racialized and gendered effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the probability of being unemployed. The distribution of the pandemic-induced job losses for women and men or for different racial/ethnic categories has been studied in the recent literature. We contribute to this literature by providing an intersectional analysis of unemployment under COVID-19, where we examine the differences in the likelihood of unemployment across groups of White men, White women, Black men, Black women, Hispanic men, and Hispanic women. As a case of study of the COVID-19 recession, our work engages with the broader empirical literature testing the discrimination theories based on the unexplained gap after accounting for observable characteristics of women, men, and different races/ethnicities and their labor market positions. Controlling for individual characteristics such as education and age, as well as industry and occupation effects, we show that women of all three racial/ethnic categories are more likely to be unemployed compared to men, yet there are substantial differences across these groups based on different unemployment measures. Hispanic women have the highest likelihood of being unemployed, followed by Black women, who are still more likely to be unemployed than White women. We also examine if the ability to work from home has benefited any particular group in terms of lowering their likelihood of unemployment during the pandemic. We find that in industries with a high degree of teleworkable jobs, White women, Black men, and Hispanic men are no longer more likely to be unemployed relative to White men. However, Black women and Hispanic Women still experience a significantly higher probability of job loss compared to White men even if they are employed in industries with highly teleworkable jobs. As we control for both individual and aggregate factors, our results suggest that these differences are not simply the result of overrepresentation of women of color in certain industries and occupations; rather, unobservable factors such as discrimination could be at work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7735953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77359532020-12-15 An Intersectional Analysis of COVID-19 Unemployment Gezici, Armagan Ozay, Ozge J Econ Race Policy Original Article Using the April 2020 Current Population Survey (CPS) micro dataset, we explore the racialized and gendered effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the probability of being unemployed. The distribution of the pandemic-induced job losses for women and men or for different racial/ethnic categories has been studied in the recent literature. We contribute to this literature by providing an intersectional analysis of unemployment under COVID-19, where we examine the differences in the likelihood of unemployment across groups of White men, White women, Black men, Black women, Hispanic men, and Hispanic women. As a case of study of the COVID-19 recession, our work engages with the broader empirical literature testing the discrimination theories based on the unexplained gap after accounting for observable characteristics of women, men, and different races/ethnicities and their labor market positions. Controlling for individual characteristics such as education and age, as well as industry and occupation effects, we show that women of all three racial/ethnic categories are more likely to be unemployed compared to men, yet there are substantial differences across these groups based on different unemployment measures. Hispanic women have the highest likelihood of being unemployed, followed by Black women, who are still more likely to be unemployed than White women. We also examine if the ability to work from home has benefited any particular group in terms of lowering their likelihood of unemployment during the pandemic. We find that in industries with a high degree of teleworkable jobs, White women, Black men, and Hispanic men are no longer more likely to be unemployed relative to White men. However, Black women and Hispanic Women still experience a significantly higher probability of job loss compared to White men even if they are employed in industries with highly teleworkable jobs. As we control for both individual and aggregate factors, our results suggest that these differences are not simply the result of overrepresentation of women of color in certain industries and occupations; rather, unobservable factors such as discrimination could be at work. Springer International Publishing 2020-12-15 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7735953/ /pubmed/35300201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41996-020-00075-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gezici, Armagan Ozay, Ozge An Intersectional Analysis of COVID-19 Unemployment |
title | An Intersectional Analysis of COVID-19 Unemployment |
title_full | An Intersectional Analysis of COVID-19 Unemployment |
title_fullStr | An Intersectional Analysis of COVID-19 Unemployment |
title_full_unstemmed | An Intersectional Analysis of COVID-19 Unemployment |
title_short | An Intersectional Analysis of COVID-19 Unemployment |
title_sort | intersectional analysis of covid-19 unemployment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7735953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41996-020-00075-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geziciarmagan anintersectionalanalysisofcovid19unemployment AT ozayozge anintersectionalanalysisofcovid19unemployment AT geziciarmagan intersectionalanalysisofcovid19unemployment AT ozayozge intersectionalanalysisofcovid19unemployment |