Cargando…

Validating a common tick survey method: cloth-dragging and line transects

Cloth-dragging is the most widely-used method for collecting and counting ticks, but there are few studies of its reliability. By using cloth-dragging, we applied a replicated line transects survey method, in two areas in Sweden with different Ixodes ricinus tick-densities (low at Grimsö and high at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kjellander, Pia L., Aronsson, Malin, Bergvall, Ulrika A., Carrasco, Josep L., Christensson, Madeleine, Lindgren, Per-Eric, Åkesson, Mikael, Kjellander, Petter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7736024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33242188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-020-00565-4
_version_ 1783622745636995072
author Kjellander, Pia L.
Aronsson, Malin
Bergvall, Ulrika A.
Carrasco, Josep L.
Christensson, Madeleine
Lindgren, Per-Eric
Åkesson, Mikael
Kjellander, Petter
author_facet Kjellander, Pia L.
Aronsson, Malin
Bergvall, Ulrika A.
Carrasco, Josep L.
Christensson, Madeleine
Lindgren, Per-Eric
Åkesson, Mikael
Kjellander, Petter
author_sort Kjellander, Pia L.
collection PubMed
description Cloth-dragging is the most widely-used method for collecting and counting ticks, but there are few studies of its reliability. By using cloth-dragging, we applied a replicated line transects survey method, in two areas in Sweden with different Ixodes ricinus tick-densities (low at Grimsö and high at Bogesund) to evaluate developmental stage specific repeatability, agreement and precision in estimates of tick abundance. ‘Repeatability’ was expressed as the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), ‘agreement’ with the Total Deviation Index (TDI) and ‘precision’ by the coefficient of variation (CV) for a given dragging distance. Repeatability (ICC) and agreement (TDI) were higher for the most abundant instar (nymphs) and in the area of higher abundance. At Bogesund tick counts were higher than at Grimsö and so also repeatability, with fair to substantial ICC estimates between 0.22 and 0.75, and TDI ranged between 1 and 44.5 counts of difference (thus high to moderate agreement). At Grimsö, ICC was poor to moderate and ranged between 0 and 0.59, whereas TDI remained low with estimates lower or equal to 1 count (thus high agreement). Despite a 100-fold lower abundance at Grimsö, the same level of precision for nymphs could be achieved with a 70% increase of dragging effort. We conclude that the cloth-dragging technique is useful for surveying ticks’ and primarily to estimate abundance of the nymphal stage, whereas it rarely will be recommended for larvae and adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10493-020-00565-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7736024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77360242020-12-17 Validating a common tick survey method: cloth-dragging and line transects Kjellander, Pia L. Aronsson, Malin Bergvall, Ulrika A. Carrasco, Josep L. Christensson, Madeleine Lindgren, Per-Eric Åkesson, Mikael Kjellander, Petter Exp Appl Acarol Article Cloth-dragging is the most widely-used method for collecting and counting ticks, but there are few studies of its reliability. By using cloth-dragging, we applied a replicated line transects survey method, in two areas in Sweden with different Ixodes ricinus tick-densities (low at Grimsö and high at Bogesund) to evaluate developmental stage specific repeatability, agreement and precision in estimates of tick abundance. ‘Repeatability’ was expressed as the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), ‘agreement’ with the Total Deviation Index (TDI) and ‘precision’ by the coefficient of variation (CV) for a given dragging distance. Repeatability (ICC) and agreement (TDI) were higher for the most abundant instar (nymphs) and in the area of higher abundance. At Bogesund tick counts were higher than at Grimsö and so also repeatability, with fair to substantial ICC estimates between 0.22 and 0.75, and TDI ranged between 1 and 44.5 counts of difference (thus high to moderate agreement). At Grimsö, ICC was poor to moderate and ranged between 0 and 0.59, whereas TDI remained low with estimates lower or equal to 1 count (thus high agreement). Despite a 100-fold lower abundance at Grimsö, the same level of precision for nymphs could be achieved with a 70% increase of dragging effort. We conclude that the cloth-dragging technique is useful for surveying ticks’ and primarily to estimate abundance of the nymphal stage, whereas it rarely will be recommended for larvae and adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10493-020-00565-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-11-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7736024/ /pubmed/33242188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-020-00565-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kjellander, Pia L.
Aronsson, Malin
Bergvall, Ulrika A.
Carrasco, Josep L.
Christensson, Madeleine
Lindgren, Per-Eric
Åkesson, Mikael
Kjellander, Petter
Validating a common tick survey method: cloth-dragging and line transects
title Validating a common tick survey method: cloth-dragging and line transects
title_full Validating a common tick survey method: cloth-dragging and line transects
title_fullStr Validating a common tick survey method: cloth-dragging and line transects
title_full_unstemmed Validating a common tick survey method: cloth-dragging and line transects
title_short Validating a common tick survey method: cloth-dragging and line transects
title_sort validating a common tick survey method: cloth-dragging and line transects
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7736024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33242188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-020-00565-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kjellanderpial validatingacommonticksurveymethodclothdraggingandlinetransects
AT aronssonmalin validatingacommonticksurveymethodclothdraggingandlinetransects
AT bergvallulrikaa validatingacommonticksurveymethodclothdraggingandlinetransects
AT carrascojosepl validatingacommonticksurveymethodclothdraggingandlinetransects
AT christenssonmadeleine validatingacommonticksurveymethodclothdraggingandlinetransects
AT lindgrenpereric validatingacommonticksurveymethodclothdraggingandlinetransects
AT akessonmikael validatingacommonticksurveymethodclothdraggingandlinetransects
AT kjellanderpetter validatingacommonticksurveymethodclothdraggingandlinetransects