Cargando…

Unequal chances: ex ante fairness and individual control

Unequal financial outcomes often originate from unequal chances. Yet, compared to outcomes, little is known about how individuals perceive unequal distributions of chances. We investigate empirically the role of different sources of unequal chances in shaping inequality perceptions. Importantly, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Micheli, Leticia, Gagnon, Nickolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7736844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33318533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78335-w
_version_ 1783622849623228416
author Micheli, Leticia
Gagnon, Nickolas
author_facet Micheli, Leticia
Gagnon, Nickolas
author_sort Micheli, Leticia
collection PubMed
description Unequal financial outcomes often originate from unequal chances. Yet, compared to outcomes, little is known about how individuals perceive unequal distributions of chances. We investigate empirically the role of different sources of unequal chances in shaping inequality perceptions. Importantly, we do so from an ex ante perspective—i.e., before the chances are realized—which has rarely been explored. In an online survey, we asked uninvolved respondents to evaluate ex ante the fairness of unequal allocations of chances. We varied the source of inequality of chances, using a comprehensive range of factors which resemble several real world situations. Respondents also evaluated how much control individuals hold over the distribution of chances. Results show that different sources generate different ex ante perception of fairness. That is, unequal chances based on socioeconomic and biological factors, such as gender, family income and ethnicity, are evaluated to be unfair relative to the same chances based on effort, knowledge, and benevolence. Results also show that, for most individuals, there is a positive correlation between perceived control of a factor and fairness of unequal chances based on that factor. Luck appears to be an exception to this correlation, ranking as high in fairness as effort, knowledge, and benevolence, but similarly low in individual control as ethnicity, family income, and gender.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7736844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77368442020-12-15 Unequal chances: ex ante fairness and individual control Micheli, Leticia Gagnon, Nickolas Sci Rep Article Unequal financial outcomes often originate from unequal chances. Yet, compared to outcomes, little is known about how individuals perceive unequal distributions of chances. We investigate empirically the role of different sources of unequal chances in shaping inequality perceptions. Importantly, we do so from an ex ante perspective—i.e., before the chances are realized—which has rarely been explored. In an online survey, we asked uninvolved respondents to evaluate ex ante the fairness of unequal allocations of chances. We varied the source of inequality of chances, using a comprehensive range of factors which resemble several real world situations. Respondents also evaluated how much control individuals hold over the distribution of chances. Results show that different sources generate different ex ante perception of fairness. That is, unequal chances based on socioeconomic and biological factors, such as gender, family income and ethnicity, are evaluated to be unfair relative to the same chances based on effort, knowledge, and benevolence. Results also show that, for most individuals, there is a positive correlation between perceived control of a factor and fairness of unequal chances based on that factor. Luck appears to be an exception to this correlation, ranking as high in fairness as effort, knowledge, and benevolence, but similarly low in individual control as ethnicity, family income, and gender. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7736844/ /pubmed/33318533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78335-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Micheli, Leticia
Gagnon, Nickolas
Unequal chances: ex ante fairness and individual control
title Unequal chances: ex ante fairness and individual control
title_full Unequal chances: ex ante fairness and individual control
title_fullStr Unequal chances: ex ante fairness and individual control
title_full_unstemmed Unequal chances: ex ante fairness and individual control
title_short Unequal chances: ex ante fairness and individual control
title_sort unequal chances: ex ante fairness and individual control
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7736844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33318533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78335-w
work_keys_str_mv AT michelileticia unequalchancesexantefairnessandindividualcontrol
AT gagnonnickolas unequalchancesexantefairnessandindividualcontrol