Cargando…
Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation post traumatic brain injury: machine learning approach
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to introduce a machine learning model that predicts in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for all adult patients who sustained TBI and wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7737377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33317528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01363-z |
_version_ | 1783622930119262208 |
---|---|
author | Abujaber, Ahmad Fadlalla, Adam Gammoh, Diala Abdelrahman, Husham Mollazehi, Monira El-Menyar, Ayman |
author_facet | Abujaber, Ahmad Fadlalla, Adam Gammoh, Diala Abdelrahman, Husham Mollazehi, Monira El-Menyar, Ayman |
author_sort | Abujaber, Ahmad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The study aimed to introduce a machine learning model that predicts in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for all adult patients who sustained TBI and were hospitalized at the trauma center from January 2014 to February 2019 with an abbreviated injury severity score for head region (HAIS) ≥ 3. We used the demographic characteristics, injuries and CT findings as predictors. Logistic regression (LR) and Artificial neural networks (ANN) were used to predict the in-hospital mortality. Accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), precision, negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, specificity and F-score were used to compare the models` performance. RESULTS: Across the study duration; 785 patients met the inclusion criteria (581 survived and 204 deceased). The two models (LR and ANN) achieved good performance with an accuracy over 80% and AUROC over 87%. However, when taking the other performance measures into account, LR achieved higher overall performance than the ANN with an accuracy and AUROC of 87% and 90.5%, respectively compared to 80.9% and 87.5%, respectively. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, severity of TBI as measured by abbreviated injury score, TBI diagnosis, the need for blood transfusion, heart rate upon admission to the emergency room and patient age were found to be the significant predictors of in-hospital mortality for TBI patients on MV. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning based LR achieved good predictive performance for the prognosis in mechanically ventilated TBI patients. This study presents an opportunity to integrate machine learning methods in the trauma registry to provide instant clinical decision-making support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7737377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77373772020-12-17 Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation post traumatic brain injury: machine learning approach Abujaber, Ahmad Fadlalla, Adam Gammoh, Diala Abdelrahman, Husham Mollazehi, Monira El-Menyar, Ayman BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: The study aimed to introduce a machine learning model that predicts in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for all adult patients who sustained TBI and were hospitalized at the trauma center from January 2014 to February 2019 with an abbreviated injury severity score for head region (HAIS) ≥ 3. We used the demographic characteristics, injuries and CT findings as predictors. Logistic regression (LR) and Artificial neural networks (ANN) were used to predict the in-hospital mortality. Accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), precision, negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, specificity and F-score were used to compare the models` performance. RESULTS: Across the study duration; 785 patients met the inclusion criteria (581 survived and 204 deceased). The two models (LR and ANN) achieved good performance with an accuracy over 80% and AUROC over 87%. However, when taking the other performance measures into account, LR achieved higher overall performance than the ANN with an accuracy and AUROC of 87% and 90.5%, respectively compared to 80.9% and 87.5%, respectively. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, severity of TBI as measured by abbreviated injury score, TBI diagnosis, the need for blood transfusion, heart rate upon admission to the emergency room and patient age were found to be the significant predictors of in-hospital mortality for TBI patients on MV. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning based LR achieved good predictive performance for the prognosis in mechanically ventilated TBI patients. This study presents an opportunity to integrate machine learning methods in the trauma registry to provide instant clinical decision-making support. BioMed Central 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7737377/ /pubmed/33317528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01363-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Abujaber, Ahmad Fadlalla, Adam Gammoh, Diala Abdelrahman, Husham Mollazehi, Monira El-Menyar, Ayman Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation post traumatic brain injury: machine learning approach |
title | Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation post traumatic brain injury: machine learning approach |
title_full | Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation post traumatic brain injury: machine learning approach |
title_fullStr | Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation post traumatic brain injury: machine learning approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation post traumatic brain injury: machine learning approach |
title_short | Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation post traumatic brain injury: machine learning approach |
title_sort | prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation post traumatic brain injury: machine learning approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7737377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33317528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01363-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abujaberahmad predictionofinhospitalmortalityinpatientsonmechanicalventilationposttraumaticbraininjurymachinelearningapproach AT fadlallaadam predictionofinhospitalmortalityinpatientsonmechanicalventilationposttraumaticbraininjurymachinelearningapproach AT gammohdiala predictionofinhospitalmortalityinpatientsonmechanicalventilationposttraumaticbraininjurymachinelearningapproach AT abdelrahmanhusham predictionofinhospitalmortalityinpatientsonmechanicalventilationposttraumaticbraininjurymachinelearningapproach AT mollazehimonira predictionofinhospitalmortalityinpatientsonmechanicalventilationposttraumaticbraininjurymachinelearningapproach AT elmenyarayman predictionofinhospitalmortalityinpatientsonmechanicalventilationposttraumaticbraininjurymachinelearningapproach |