Cargando…

Investigating the Electrical Properties of Different Cochlear Implants

This study characterises and compares electrical properties and current spread across four different makes of cochlear implants with differing electrode designs using a 3D-printed artificial cochlear model. BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants are currently limited by current spread within the cochlea, whi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swaddiwudhipong, Nol, Jiang, Chen, Landry, Thomas G., Bance, Manohar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7737872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32941302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002861
_version_ 1783623011059892224
author Swaddiwudhipong, Nol
Jiang, Chen
Landry, Thomas G.
Bance, Manohar
author_facet Swaddiwudhipong, Nol
Jiang, Chen
Landry, Thomas G.
Bance, Manohar
author_sort Swaddiwudhipong, Nol
collection PubMed
description This study characterises and compares electrical properties and current spread across four different makes of cochlear implants with differing electrode designs using a 3D-printed artificial cochlear model. BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants are currently limited by current spread within the cochlea, which causes low spectral resolution of auditory nerve stimulation. Different cochlear implant makes vary in electrode size, shape, number, and configuration. How these differences affect cochlear implant current spread and function is not well known. METHOD: Each cochlear implant was inserted into a linear cochlear model containing recording electrodes along its length. Biphasic monopolar stimulation of each implant electrode was carried out, and the resultant waveform and transimpedance matrix (TIM) data obtained from the recording electrodes. This was repeated with each implant rotated 180 degrees in the cochlea model to examine the effects of electrode orientation. Impedance spectroscopy was also carried out at the apex, middle, and base of the model. RESULTS: The four cochlear implants displayed similar TIM profiles and waveforms. One hundred eighty degrees rotation of each cochlear implant made little difference to the TIM profiles. Impedance spectroscopy demonstrated broad similarities in amplitude and phase across the implants, but exhibited differences in certain electrical parameters. CONCLUSION: Implants with different designs demonstrate similar electrical performance, regardless of electrode size and spacing or electrode array dimension. In addition, rotatory maneuvers during cochlear implantation surgery are unlikely to change implant impedance properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7737872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77378722020-12-22 Investigating the Electrical Properties of Different Cochlear Implants Swaddiwudhipong, Nol Jiang, Chen Landry, Thomas G. Bance, Manohar Otol Neurotol Cochlear Implants This study characterises and compares electrical properties and current spread across four different makes of cochlear implants with differing electrode designs using a 3D-printed artificial cochlear model. BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants are currently limited by current spread within the cochlea, which causes low spectral resolution of auditory nerve stimulation. Different cochlear implant makes vary in electrode size, shape, number, and configuration. How these differences affect cochlear implant current spread and function is not well known. METHOD: Each cochlear implant was inserted into a linear cochlear model containing recording electrodes along its length. Biphasic monopolar stimulation of each implant electrode was carried out, and the resultant waveform and transimpedance matrix (TIM) data obtained from the recording electrodes. This was repeated with each implant rotated 180 degrees in the cochlea model to examine the effects of electrode orientation. Impedance spectroscopy was also carried out at the apex, middle, and base of the model. RESULTS: The four cochlear implants displayed similar TIM profiles and waveforms. One hundred eighty degrees rotation of each cochlear implant made little difference to the TIM profiles. Impedance spectroscopy demonstrated broad similarities in amplitude and phase across the implants, but exhibited differences in certain electrical parameters. CONCLUSION: Implants with different designs demonstrate similar electrical performance, regardless of electrode size and spacing or electrode array dimension. In addition, rotatory maneuvers during cochlear implantation surgery are unlikely to change implant impedance properties. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-01 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7737872/ /pubmed/32941302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002861 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Otology & Neurotology, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Cochlear Implants
Swaddiwudhipong, Nol
Jiang, Chen
Landry, Thomas G.
Bance, Manohar
Investigating the Electrical Properties of Different Cochlear Implants
title Investigating the Electrical Properties of Different Cochlear Implants
title_full Investigating the Electrical Properties of Different Cochlear Implants
title_fullStr Investigating the Electrical Properties of Different Cochlear Implants
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the Electrical Properties of Different Cochlear Implants
title_short Investigating the Electrical Properties of Different Cochlear Implants
title_sort investigating the electrical properties of different cochlear implants
topic Cochlear Implants
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7737872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32941302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002861
work_keys_str_mv AT swaddiwudhipongnol investigatingtheelectricalpropertiesofdifferentcochlearimplants
AT jiangchen investigatingtheelectricalpropertiesofdifferentcochlearimplants
AT landrythomasg investigatingtheelectricalpropertiesofdifferentcochlearimplants
AT bancemanohar investigatingtheelectricalpropertiesofdifferentcochlearimplants