Prognostic value of the systemic inflammation response index in human malignancy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) in malignancy based on existing evidence. METHODS: We searched for relevant literature published in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase before April 10, 2020. Hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and pooled to evaluate the relationship between SIRI and malignancy outcomes. RESULTS: We included 14 articles, describing 6,035 patients. Our findings revealed that patients with high SIRI had worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.85–2.62, P < .001), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.49–2.48, P < .001), time-to-progression (TTP) (HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.55–2.58, P < .001), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.38–2.16, P < .001), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR: 3.57, 95% CI: 2.25–5.68, P < 0.001), disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.46 - 2.72, P < .001), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) (HR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.28–3.99, P = .005) than patients with low SIRI. The correlation between SIRI and OS did not change in a subgroup analysis. Meta-regression indicated that heterogeneity may be related to differences in primary therapy strategies. Sensitivity analysis suggested that our results were reliable. CONCLUSIONS: SIRI could be used as a useful predictor of poor prognosis during malignancy treatment.