Cargando…
A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage
We aimed to understand the evaluation of different Bowie-Dick test (B-D test) on the performance of pressure steam sterilization equipment in the case of simulated gas leakage, and we selected a pulsating vacuum steam sterilizer to set 4 different gas leakage levels: 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, and 1.7 mbar/min...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33327350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023653 |
_version_ | 1783623071620399104 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Xiaomei Zhang, Qing Deng, Xingling Liang, Jinxiu Hao, Shuqin Chen, Jianling Du, Heying |
author_facet | Yu, Xiaomei Zhang, Qing Deng, Xingling Liang, Jinxiu Hao, Shuqin Chen, Jianling Du, Heying |
author_sort | Yu, Xiaomei |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aimed to understand the evaluation of different Bowie-Dick test (B-D test) on the performance of pressure steam sterilization equipment in the case of simulated gas leakage, and we selected a pulsating vacuum steam sterilizer to set 4 different gas leakage levels: 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, and 1.7 mbar/min during the B-D test phase. In terms of methods, 4 different brands of B-D test kits (devices) were tested at 4 different leakage rates, and a total of 48 experiments were conducted. The results from univariate analysis revealed that there are statistically significant differences in the judgment of test results among different personnel and brands. The results from multivariate logistic regression analysis displayed that the difference between different personnel was statistically significant (χ(2) = 45.34, P < .001); the difference between different products was statistically significant (χ(2) = 129.37, P < .001); and there was no statistically significant difference between different degree of leakage (χ(2) = 6.99, P > .05). Result judgments of brand 1 and brand 2 are susceptible to subjective factors. The judgment of brand 3 is intuitive and consistent with the evaluation result of brand 4. In conclusion, the order of capacity to evaluate air leakage from best to worst is brand 4→brand 3→brand 1→brand 2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7738145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77381452020-12-16 A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage Yu, Xiaomei Zhang, Qing Deng, Xingling Liang, Jinxiu Hao, Shuqin Chen, Jianling Du, Heying Medicine (Baltimore) 4900 We aimed to understand the evaluation of different Bowie-Dick test (B-D test) on the performance of pressure steam sterilization equipment in the case of simulated gas leakage, and we selected a pulsating vacuum steam sterilizer to set 4 different gas leakage levels: 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, and 1.7 mbar/min during the B-D test phase. In terms of methods, 4 different brands of B-D test kits (devices) were tested at 4 different leakage rates, and a total of 48 experiments were conducted. The results from univariate analysis revealed that there are statistically significant differences in the judgment of test results among different personnel and brands. The results from multivariate logistic regression analysis displayed that the difference between different personnel was statistically significant (χ(2) = 45.34, P < .001); the difference between different products was statistically significant (χ(2) = 129.37, P < .001); and there was no statistically significant difference between different degree of leakage (χ(2) = 6.99, P > .05). Result judgments of brand 1 and brand 2 are susceptible to subjective factors. The judgment of brand 3 is intuitive and consistent with the evaluation result of brand 4. In conclusion, the order of capacity to evaluate air leakage from best to worst is brand 4→brand 3→brand 1→brand 2. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7738145/ /pubmed/33327350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023653 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4900 Yu, Xiaomei Zhang, Qing Deng, Xingling Liang, Jinxiu Hao, Shuqin Chen, Jianling Du, Heying A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage |
title | A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage |
title_full | A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage |
title_fullStr | A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage |
title_short | A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage |
title_sort | comparative study of four bowie-dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage |
topic | 4900 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33327350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuxiaomei acomparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage AT zhangqing acomparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage AT dengxingling acomparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage AT liangjinxiu acomparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage AT haoshuqin acomparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage AT chenjianling acomparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage AT duheying acomparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage AT yuxiaomei comparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage AT zhangqing comparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage AT dengxingling comparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage AT liangjinxiu comparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage AT haoshuqin comparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage AT chenjianling comparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage AT duheying comparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage |