Cargando…

A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage

We aimed to understand the evaluation of different Bowie-Dick test (B-D test) on the performance of pressure steam sterilization equipment in the case of simulated gas leakage, and we selected a pulsating vacuum steam sterilizer to set 4 different gas leakage levels: 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, and 1.7 mbar/min...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Xiaomei, Zhang, Qing, Deng, Xingling, Liang, Jinxiu, Hao, Shuqin, Chen, Jianling, Du, Heying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33327350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023653
_version_ 1783623071620399104
author Yu, Xiaomei
Zhang, Qing
Deng, Xingling
Liang, Jinxiu
Hao, Shuqin
Chen, Jianling
Du, Heying
author_facet Yu, Xiaomei
Zhang, Qing
Deng, Xingling
Liang, Jinxiu
Hao, Shuqin
Chen, Jianling
Du, Heying
author_sort Yu, Xiaomei
collection PubMed
description We aimed to understand the evaluation of different Bowie-Dick test (B-D test) on the performance of pressure steam sterilization equipment in the case of simulated gas leakage, and we selected a pulsating vacuum steam sterilizer to set 4 different gas leakage levels: 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, and 1.7 mbar/min during the B-D test phase. In terms of methods, 4 different brands of B-D test kits (devices) were tested at 4 different leakage rates, and a total of 48 experiments were conducted. The results from univariate analysis revealed that there are statistically significant differences in the judgment of test results among different personnel and brands. The results from multivariate logistic regression analysis displayed that the difference between different personnel was statistically significant (χ(2) = 45.34, P < .001); the difference between different products was statistically significant (χ(2) = 129.37, P < .001); and there was no statistically significant difference between different degree of leakage (χ(2) = 6.99, P > .05). Result judgments of brand 1 and brand 2 are susceptible to subjective factors. The judgment of brand 3 is intuitive and consistent with the evaluation result of brand 4. In conclusion, the order of capacity to evaluate air leakage from best to worst is brand 4→brand 3→brand 1→brand 2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7738145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77381452020-12-16 A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage Yu, Xiaomei Zhang, Qing Deng, Xingling Liang, Jinxiu Hao, Shuqin Chen, Jianling Du, Heying Medicine (Baltimore) 4900 We aimed to understand the evaluation of different Bowie-Dick test (B-D test) on the performance of pressure steam sterilization equipment in the case of simulated gas leakage, and we selected a pulsating vacuum steam sterilizer to set 4 different gas leakage levels: 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, and 1.7 mbar/min during the B-D test phase. In terms of methods, 4 different brands of B-D test kits (devices) were tested at 4 different leakage rates, and a total of 48 experiments were conducted. The results from univariate analysis revealed that there are statistically significant differences in the judgment of test results among different personnel and brands. The results from multivariate logistic regression analysis displayed that the difference between different personnel was statistically significant (χ(2) = 45.34, P < .001); the difference between different products was statistically significant (χ(2) = 129.37, P < .001); and there was no statistically significant difference between different degree of leakage (χ(2) = 6.99, P > .05). Result judgments of brand 1 and brand 2 are susceptible to subjective factors. The judgment of brand 3 is intuitive and consistent with the evaluation result of brand 4. In conclusion, the order of capacity to evaluate air leakage from best to worst is brand 4→brand 3→brand 1→brand 2. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7738145/ /pubmed/33327350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023653 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 4900
Yu, Xiaomei
Zhang, Qing
Deng, Xingling
Liang, Jinxiu
Hao, Shuqin
Chen, Jianling
Du, Heying
A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage
title A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage
title_full A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage
title_fullStr A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage
title_short A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage
title_sort comparative study of four bowie-dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage
topic 4900
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33327350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023653
work_keys_str_mv AT yuxiaomei acomparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage
AT zhangqing acomparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage
AT dengxingling acomparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage
AT liangjinxiu acomparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage
AT haoshuqin acomparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage
AT chenjianling acomparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage
AT duheying acomparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage
AT yuxiaomei comparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage
AT zhangqing comparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage
AT dengxingling comparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage
AT liangjinxiu comparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage
AT haoshuqin comparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage
AT chenjianling comparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage
AT duheying comparativestudyoffourbowiedicktestundertheconditionofpressuresteamsterilizersimulatinggasleakage