Cargando…

Virtual Care for Indigenous Populations in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand: Protocol for a Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: Indigenous people in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand experience an increased burden of chronic diseases compared to non-Indigenous people in these countries. Lack of necessary services and culturally relevant care for Indigenous people contributes to this burden. Ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camp, Pat, Girt, Mirha, Wells, Alix, Malas, Adeeb, Peter, Maryke, Crosbie, Stephanie, Holyk, Travis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33258789
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21860
_version_ 1783623094003302400
author Camp, Pat
Girt, Mirha
Wells, Alix
Malas, Adeeb
Peter, Maryke
Crosbie, Stephanie
Holyk, Travis
author_facet Camp, Pat
Girt, Mirha
Wells, Alix
Malas, Adeeb
Peter, Maryke
Crosbie, Stephanie
Holyk, Travis
author_sort Camp, Pat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Indigenous people in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand experience an increased burden of chronic diseases compared to non-Indigenous people in these countries. Lack of necessary services and culturally relevant care for Indigenous people contributes to this burden. Many Indigenous communities have implemented systems, such as virtual care, to improve chronic disease management. Virtual care has extended beyond videoconferencing to include more advanced technologies, such as remote biometric monitoring devices. However, given the historical and ongoing Western intrusion into Indigenous day to day life, these technologies may seem more invasive and thus require additional research on their acceptability and utility within Indigenous populations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to present the protocol for a scoping review, which aims to map existing evidence. This study is based on the following guiding research question: What are the characteristics of virtual care use by Indigenous adult populations in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand? The subquestions are related to the technology used, health conditions and nature of the virtual care, cultural safety, and key concepts for effective use. METHODS: This scoping review protocol is informed by the methodology described by the Joanna Briggs Institute and is supplemented by the frameworks proposed by Arksey and O’Malley and Levac et al. A search for published and gray literature, written in English, and published between 2000 and present will be completed utilizing electronic databases and search engines, including MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Indigenous Peoples of North America, Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet, Informit, and Native Health Database. Search results will be uploaded to the review software, Covidence, for title and abstract screening before full-text screening begins. This process will be repeated for gray literature. Upon completion, a data abstraction tool will organize the relevant information into categorical formations. RESULTS: The search strategy has been confirmed, and the screening of titles and abstracts is underway. As of October 2020, we have identified over 300 articles for full-text screening. CONCLUSIONS: Previous reviews have addressed virtual care within Indigenous communities. However, new virtual care technologies have since emerged; subsequently, additional literature has been published. Mapping and synthesizing this literature will inform new directions for research and discussion. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/21860
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7738260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77382602020-12-18 Virtual Care for Indigenous Populations in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand: Protocol for a Scoping Review Camp, Pat Girt, Mirha Wells, Alix Malas, Adeeb Peter, Maryke Crosbie, Stephanie Holyk, Travis JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Indigenous people in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand experience an increased burden of chronic diseases compared to non-Indigenous people in these countries. Lack of necessary services and culturally relevant care for Indigenous people contributes to this burden. Many Indigenous communities have implemented systems, such as virtual care, to improve chronic disease management. Virtual care has extended beyond videoconferencing to include more advanced technologies, such as remote biometric monitoring devices. However, given the historical and ongoing Western intrusion into Indigenous day to day life, these technologies may seem more invasive and thus require additional research on their acceptability and utility within Indigenous populations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to present the protocol for a scoping review, which aims to map existing evidence. This study is based on the following guiding research question: What are the characteristics of virtual care use by Indigenous adult populations in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand? The subquestions are related to the technology used, health conditions and nature of the virtual care, cultural safety, and key concepts for effective use. METHODS: This scoping review protocol is informed by the methodology described by the Joanna Briggs Institute and is supplemented by the frameworks proposed by Arksey and O’Malley and Levac et al. A search for published and gray literature, written in English, and published between 2000 and present will be completed utilizing electronic databases and search engines, including MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Indigenous Peoples of North America, Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet, Informit, and Native Health Database. Search results will be uploaded to the review software, Covidence, for title and abstract screening before full-text screening begins. This process will be repeated for gray literature. Upon completion, a data abstraction tool will organize the relevant information into categorical formations. RESULTS: The search strategy has been confirmed, and the screening of titles and abstracts is underway. As of October 2020, we have identified over 300 articles for full-text screening. CONCLUSIONS: Previous reviews have addressed virtual care within Indigenous communities. However, new virtual care technologies have since emerged; subsequently, additional literature has been published. Mapping and synthesizing this literature will inform new directions for research and discussion. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/21860 JMIR Publications 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7738260/ /pubmed/33258789 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21860 Text en ©Pat Camp, Mirha Girt, Alix Wells, Adeeb Malas, Maryke Peter, Stephanie Crosbie, Travis Holyk. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 01.12.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Camp, Pat
Girt, Mirha
Wells, Alix
Malas, Adeeb
Peter, Maryke
Crosbie, Stephanie
Holyk, Travis
Virtual Care for Indigenous Populations in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand: Protocol for a Scoping Review
title Virtual Care for Indigenous Populations in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand: Protocol for a Scoping Review
title_full Virtual Care for Indigenous Populations in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand: Protocol for a Scoping Review
title_fullStr Virtual Care for Indigenous Populations in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand: Protocol for a Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Virtual Care for Indigenous Populations in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand: Protocol for a Scoping Review
title_short Virtual Care for Indigenous Populations in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand: Protocol for a Scoping Review
title_sort virtual care for indigenous populations in canada, the united states, australia, and new zealand: protocol for a scoping review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33258789
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21860
work_keys_str_mv AT camppat virtualcareforindigenouspopulationsincanadatheunitedstatesaustraliaandnewzealandprotocolforascopingreview
AT girtmirha virtualcareforindigenouspopulationsincanadatheunitedstatesaustraliaandnewzealandprotocolforascopingreview
AT wellsalix virtualcareforindigenouspopulationsincanadatheunitedstatesaustraliaandnewzealandprotocolforascopingreview
AT malasadeeb virtualcareforindigenouspopulationsincanadatheunitedstatesaustraliaandnewzealandprotocolforascopingreview
AT petermaryke virtualcareforindigenouspopulationsincanadatheunitedstatesaustraliaandnewzealandprotocolforascopingreview
AT crosbiestephanie virtualcareforindigenouspopulationsincanadatheunitedstatesaustraliaandnewzealandprotocolforascopingreview
AT holyktravis virtualcareforindigenouspopulationsincanadatheunitedstatesaustraliaandnewzealandprotocolforascopingreview