Cargando…

Shrinking Your Deictic System: How Far Can You Go?

Languages around the world differ in terms of the number of adnominal and pronominal demonstratives they require, as well as the factors that impact on their felicitous use. Given this cross-linguistic variation in deictic demonstrative terms, and the features that determine their felicitous use, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vulchanova, Mila, Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro, Collier, Jacqueline, Vulchanov, Valentin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343451
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575497
_version_ 1783623119413444608
author Vulchanova, Mila
Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro
Collier, Jacqueline
Vulchanov, Valentin
author_facet Vulchanova, Mila
Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro
Collier, Jacqueline
Vulchanov, Valentin
author_sort Vulchanova, Mila
collection PubMed
description Languages around the world differ in terms of the number of adnominal and pronominal demonstratives they require, as well as the factors that impact on their felicitous use. Given this cross-linguistic variation in deictic demonstrative terms, and the features that determine their felicitous use, an open question is how this is accommodated within bilingual cognition and language. In particular, we were interested in the extent to which bilingual language exposure and practice might alter the way in which a bilingual is using deictic demonstratives in their first language. Recent research on language attrition suggests that L2 learning selectively affects aspects of the native language, with some domains of language competence being more vulnerable than others. If demonstratives are basic, and acquired relatively early, they should be less susceptible to change and attrition. This was the hypothesis we went on to test in the current study. We tested two groups of native Spanish speakers, a control group living in Spain and an experimental group living in Norway using the (Spatial) Memory game paradigm. Contra to our expectations, the results indicate a significant difference between the two groups in use of deictic terms, indicative of a change in the preferred number of terms used. This suggests that deictic referential systems may change over time under pressure from bilingual language exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7738459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77384592020-12-17 Shrinking Your Deictic System: How Far Can You Go? Vulchanova, Mila Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro Collier, Jacqueline Vulchanov, Valentin Front Psychol Psychology Languages around the world differ in terms of the number of adnominal and pronominal demonstratives they require, as well as the factors that impact on their felicitous use. Given this cross-linguistic variation in deictic demonstrative terms, and the features that determine their felicitous use, an open question is how this is accommodated within bilingual cognition and language. In particular, we were interested in the extent to which bilingual language exposure and practice might alter the way in which a bilingual is using deictic demonstratives in their first language. Recent research on language attrition suggests that L2 learning selectively affects aspects of the native language, with some domains of language competence being more vulnerable than others. If demonstratives are basic, and acquired relatively early, they should be less susceptible to change and attrition. This was the hypothesis we went on to test in the current study. We tested two groups of native Spanish speakers, a control group living in Spain and an experimental group living in Norway using the (Spatial) Memory game paradigm. Contra to our expectations, the results indicate a significant difference between the two groups in use of deictic terms, indicative of a change in the preferred number of terms used. This suggests that deictic referential systems may change over time under pressure from bilingual language exposure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7738459/ /pubmed/33343451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575497 Text en Copyright © 2020 Vulchanova, Guijarro-Fuentes, Collier and Vulchanov. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Vulchanova, Mila
Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro
Collier, Jacqueline
Vulchanov, Valentin
Shrinking Your Deictic System: How Far Can You Go?
title Shrinking Your Deictic System: How Far Can You Go?
title_full Shrinking Your Deictic System: How Far Can You Go?
title_fullStr Shrinking Your Deictic System: How Far Can You Go?
title_full_unstemmed Shrinking Your Deictic System: How Far Can You Go?
title_short Shrinking Your Deictic System: How Far Can You Go?
title_sort shrinking your deictic system: how far can you go?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343451
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575497
work_keys_str_mv AT vulchanovamila shrinkingyourdeicticsystemhowfarcanyougo
AT guijarrofuentespedro shrinkingyourdeicticsystemhowfarcanyougo
AT collierjacqueline shrinkingyourdeicticsystemhowfarcanyougo
AT vulchanovvalentin shrinkingyourdeicticsystemhowfarcanyougo