Cargando…

Sanger Validation of High-Throughput Sequencing in Genetic Diagnosis: Still the Best Practice?

Next-generation sequencing (NGS)’s crucial role in supporting genetic diagnosis and personalized medicine leads to the definition of Guidelines for Diagnostic NGS by the European Society of Human Genetics. Factors of different nature producing false-positive/negative NGS data together with the pauci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Cario, Rosina, Kura, Ada, Suraci, Samuele, Magi, Alberto, Volta, Andrea, Marcucci, Rossella, Gori, Anna Maria, Pepe, Guglielmina, Giusti, Betti, Sticchi, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343633
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.592588
_version_ 1783623142763134976
author De Cario, Rosina
Kura, Ada
Suraci, Samuele
Magi, Alberto
Volta, Andrea
Marcucci, Rossella
Gori, Anna Maria
Pepe, Guglielmina
Giusti, Betti
Sticchi, Elena
author_facet De Cario, Rosina
Kura, Ada
Suraci, Samuele
Magi, Alberto
Volta, Andrea
Marcucci, Rossella
Gori, Anna Maria
Pepe, Guglielmina
Giusti, Betti
Sticchi, Elena
author_sort De Cario, Rosina
collection PubMed
description Next-generation sequencing (NGS)’s crucial role in supporting genetic diagnosis and personalized medicine leads to the definition of Guidelines for Diagnostic NGS by the European Society of Human Genetics. Factors of different nature producing false-positive/negative NGS data together with the paucity of internationally accepted guidelines providing specified NGS quality metrics to be followed for diagnostics purpose made the Sanger validation of NGS variants still mandatory. We reported the analysis of three cases of discrepancy between NGS and Sanger sequencing in a cohort of 218 patients. NGS was performed by Illumina MiSeq(®) and Haloplex/SureSelect protocols targeting 97 or 57 or 10 gene panels usually applied for diagnostics. Variants called following guidelines suggested by the Broad Institute and identified according to MAF <0.01 and allele balance >0.2 were Sanger validated. Three out of 945 validated variants showed a discrepancy between NGS and Sanger. In all three cases, a deep evaluation of the discrepant gene variant results and methodological approach allowed to confirm the NGS datum. Allelic dropout (ADO) occurrence during polymerase chain or sequencing reaction was observed, mainly related to incorrect variant zygosity. Our study extends literature data in which almost 100% “high quality” NGS variants are confirmed by Sanger; moreover, it demonstrates that in case of discrepancy between a high-quality NGS variant and Sanger validation, NGS call should not be a priori assumed to represent the source of the error. Actually, difficulties (i.e., ADO, unpredictable presence of private variants on primer-binding regions) of the so-called gold standard direct sequencing should be considered especially in light of the constantly implemented and accurate high-throughput technologies. Our data along with literature raise a discussion on the opportunity to establish a standardized quality threshold by International Guidelines for clinical NGS in order to limit Sanger confirmation to borderline conditions of variant quality parameters and verification of correct gene variant call/patient coupling on a different blood sample aliquot.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7738558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77385582020-12-17 Sanger Validation of High-Throughput Sequencing in Genetic Diagnosis: Still the Best Practice? De Cario, Rosina Kura, Ada Suraci, Samuele Magi, Alberto Volta, Andrea Marcucci, Rossella Gori, Anna Maria Pepe, Guglielmina Giusti, Betti Sticchi, Elena Front Genet Genetics Next-generation sequencing (NGS)’s crucial role in supporting genetic diagnosis and personalized medicine leads to the definition of Guidelines for Diagnostic NGS by the European Society of Human Genetics. Factors of different nature producing false-positive/negative NGS data together with the paucity of internationally accepted guidelines providing specified NGS quality metrics to be followed for diagnostics purpose made the Sanger validation of NGS variants still mandatory. We reported the analysis of three cases of discrepancy between NGS and Sanger sequencing in a cohort of 218 patients. NGS was performed by Illumina MiSeq(®) and Haloplex/SureSelect protocols targeting 97 or 57 or 10 gene panels usually applied for diagnostics. Variants called following guidelines suggested by the Broad Institute and identified according to MAF <0.01 and allele balance >0.2 were Sanger validated. Three out of 945 validated variants showed a discrepancy between NGS and Sanger. In all three cases, a deep evaluation of the discrepant gene variant results and methodological approach allowed to confirm the NGS datum. Allelic dropout (ADO) occurrence during polymerase chain or sequencing reaction was observed, mainly related to incorrect variant zygosity. Our study extends literature data in which almost 100% “high quality” NGS variants are confirmed by Sanger; moreover, it demonstrates that in case of discrepancy between a high-quality NGS variant and Sanger validation, NGS call should not be a priori assumed to represent the source of the error. Actually, difficulties (i.e., ADO, unpredictable presence of private variants on primer-binding regions) of the so-called gold standard direct sequencing should be considered especially in light of the constantly implemented and accurate high-throughput technologies. Our data along with literature raise a discussion on the opportunity to establish a standardized quality threshold by International Guidelines for clinical NGS in order to limit Sanger confirmation to borderline conditions of variant quality parameters and verification of correct gene variant call/patient coupling on a different blood sample aliquot. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7738558/ /pubmed/33343633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.592588 Text en Copyright © 2020 De Cario, Kura, Suraci, Magi, Volta, Marcucci, Gori, Pepe, Giusti and Sticchi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
De Cario, Rosina
Kura, Ada
Suraci, Samuele
Magi, Alberto
Volta, Andrea
Marcucci, Rossella
Gori, Anna Maria
Pepe, Guglielmina
Giusti, Betti
Sticchi, Elena
Sanger Validation of High-Throughput Sequencing in Genetic Diagnosis: Still the Best Practice?
title Sanger Validation of High-Throughput Sequencing in Genetic Diagnosis: Still the Best Practice?
title_full Sanger Validation of High-Throughput Sequencing in Genetic Diagnosis: Still the Best Practice?
title_fullStr Sanger Validation of High-Throughput Sequencing in Genetic Diagnosis: Still the Best Practice?
title_full_unstemmed Sanger Validation of High-Throughput Sequencing in Genetic Diagnosis: Still the Best Practice?
title_short Sanger Validation of High-Throughput Sequencing in Genetic Diagnosis: Still the Best Practice?
title_sort sanger validation of high-throughput sequencing in genetic diagnosis: still the best practice?
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343633
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.592588
work_keys_str_mv AT decariorosina sangervalidationofhighthroughputsequencingingeneticdiagnosisstillthebestpractice
AT kuraada sangervalidationofhighthroughputsequencingingeneticdiagnosisstillthebestpractice
AT suracisamuele sangervalidationofhighthroughputsequencingingeneticdiagnosisstillthebestpractice
AT magialberto sangervalidationofhighthroughputsequencingingeneticdiagnosisstillthebestpractice
AT voltaandrea sangervalidationofhighthroughputsequencingingeneticdiagnosisstillthebestpractice
AT marcuccirossella sangervalidationofhighthroughputsequencingingeneticdiagnosisstillthebestpractice
AT goriannamaria sangervalidationofhighthroughputsequencingingeneticdiagnosisstillthebestpractice
AT pepeguglielmina sangervalidationofhighthroughputsequencingingeneticdiagnosisstillthebestpractice
AT giustibetti sangervalidationofhighthroughputsequencingingeneticdiagnosisstillthebestpractice
AT sticchielena sangervalidationofhighthroughputsequencingingeneticdiagnosisstillthebestpractice