Cargando…

Larger polyethylene glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: are they safe?

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is gaining popularity owing to its proven longevity and good outcome scores. Scapular notching remains a concern. This study aimed to assess the safety of larger polyethylene glenospheres with increased eccentricity in comparison with the more conventional m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Carl W., Barrett, Matthew, Erickson, John, Chatindiara, Idah, Poon, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33345238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.08.011
_version_ 1783623150422982656
author Jones, Carl W.
Barrett, Matthew
Erickson, John
Chatindiara, Idah
Poon, Peter
author_facet Jones, Carl W.
Barrett, Matthew
Erickson, John
Chatindiara, Idah
Poon, Peter
author_sort Jones, Carl W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is gaining popularity owing to its proven longevity and good outcome scores. Scapular notching remains a concern. This study aimed to assess the safety of larger polyethylene glenospheres with increased eccentricity in comparison with the more conventional metal bearings. The secondary effects on scapular notching, clinical outcomes, range of movement, and complications were also analyzed. METHODS: We conducted a 10-year retrospective review of 145 SMR reverse shoulder arthroplasties (LimaCorporate, Udine, Italy) in 132 patients with radiographs at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was the survivorship of the larger polyethylene glenospheres. Secondary outcomes were the presence and size of notching, subjective satisfaction score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Oxford Shoulder Score, range of motion, and shoulder-related complications. RESULTS: No failures of the polyethylene glenospheres were noted in the 10-year period. At a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up, notching was noted in 16 (25%) of the metal glenospheres vs. 9 (11.1%) of the polyethylene glenospheres (P = .028). The mean Oxford Shoulder Score was lower for the metal glenospheres (P = .005). Range of motion, complications, and overall satisfaction were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The inverted bearing configuration demonstrated no failures at a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. A larger study is required to determine whether the decreased incidence and size of early notching are related to the bearing size or material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7738592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77385922020-12-18 Larger polyethylene glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: are they safe? Jones, Carl W. Barrett, Matthew Erickson, John Chatindiara, Idah Poon, Peter JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is gaining popularity owing to its proven longevity and good outcome scores. Scapular notching remains a concern. This study aimed to assess the safety of larger polyethylene glenospheres with increased eccentricity in comparison with the more conventional metal bearings. The secondary effects on scapular notching, clinical outcomes, range of movement, and complications were also analyzed. METHODS: We conducted a 10-year retrospective review of 145 SMR reverse shoulder arthroplasties (LimaCorporate, Udine, Italy) in 132 patients with radiographs at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was the survivorship of the larger polyethylene glenospheres. Secondary outcomes were the presence and size of notching, subjective satisfaction score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Oxford Shoulder Score, range of motion, and shoulder-related complications. RESULTS: No failures of the polyethylene glenospheres were noted in the 10-year period. At a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up, notching was noted in 16 (25%) of the metal glenospheres vs. 9 (11.1%) of the polyethylene glenospheres (P = .028). The mean Oxford Shoulder Score was lower for the metal glenospheres (P = .005). Range of motion, complications, and overall satisfaction were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The inverted bearing configuration demonstrated no failures at a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. A larger study is required to determine whether the decreased incidence and size of early notching are related to the bearing size or material. Elsevier 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7738592/ /pubmed/33345238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.08.011 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Jones, Carl W.
Barrett, Matthew
Erickson, John
Chatindiara, Idah
Poon, Peter
Larger polyethylene glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: are they safe?
title Larger polyethylene glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: are they safe?
title_full Larger polyethylene glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: are they safe?
title_fullStr Larger polyethylene glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: are they safe?
title_full_unstemmed Larger polyethylene glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: are they safe?
title_short Larger polyethylene glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: are they safe?
title_sort larger polyethylene glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: are they safe?
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33345238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.08.011
work_keys_str_mv AT jonescarlw largerpolyethyleneglenospheresinreverseshoulderarthroplastyaretheysafe
AT barrettmatthew largerpolyethyleneglenospheresinreverseshoulderarthroplastyaretheysafe
AT ericksonjohn largerpolyethyleneglenospheresinreverseshoulderarthroplastyaretheysafe
AT chatindiaraidah largerpolyethyleneglenospheresinreverseshoulderarthroplastyaretheysafe
AT poonpeter largerpolyethyleneglenospheresinreverseshoulderarthroplastyaretheysafe