Cargando…

Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears?

PURPOSE: To study the effect of the coracohumeral interval and orientation of the glenoid for causation of subscapularis tears and literature review for the need of coracoplasty. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery from January 2013 t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sundararajan, Silvampatti Ramasamy, Joseph, Joseph Babu, Ramakanth, Rajagopalakrishnan, Jha, Amit Kumar, Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33345230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.006
_version_ 1783623151008088064
author Sundararajan, Silvampatti Ramasamy
Joseph, Joseph Babu
Ramakanth, Rajagopalakrishnan
Jha, Amit Kumar
Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
author_facet Sundararajan, Silvampatti Ramasamy
Joseph, Joseph Babu
Ramakanth, Rajagopalakrishnan
Jha, Amit Kumar
Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
author_sort Sundararajan, Silvampatti Ramasamy
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To study the effect of the coracohumeral interval and orientation of the glenoid for causation of subscapularis tears and literature review for the need of coracoplasty. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery from January 2013 to December 2017. The coracohumeral interval and orientation of the glenoid in patients with arthroscopically diagnosed subscapularis tears (group A, n = 40) were compared with 2 control groups (group B, n = 38 [intact subscapularis with supraspinatus and infraspinatus cuff tears] and group C, n = 39 [intact rotator cuff]). Group A1 (n = 23) consisted of the isolated subscapularis and combined subscapularis + supraspinatus tears, and group A2 (n = 17) all the 3 rotator cuff tears. The measurements were made on preoperative axial magnetic resonance imaging. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the groups. RESULTS: The mean coracohumeral interval was 8.81 ± 2.69 mm in group A and 10.62 ± 2.21 and 10.39 ± 2.59 mm in control groups B and C, respectively; this difference was statistically significant (P = .002 and .01, respectively). The mean glenoid version in patients with subscapularis tears was −3.7°, whereas the mean version in patients with intact cuff was −3.4°, and this difference was not statistically significant (P = .74). The mean glenoid version was −4.69° ± 4.22° in group A1 and −3.28° ± 4.04° in group B, with no statistically significant difference (P = .07). CONCLUSION: The coracohumeral interval was significantly decreased in patients with subscapularis tears. The glenoid was retroverted in the subscapularis group but was not statistically significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7738594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77385942020-12-18 Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears? Sundararajan, Silvampatti Ramasamy Joseph, Joseph Babu Ramakanth, Rajagopalakrishnan Jha, Amit Kumar Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan JSES Int Shoulder PURPOSE: To study the effect of the coracohumeral interval and orientation of the glenoid for causation of subscapularis tears and literature review for the need of coracoplasty. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery from January 2013 to December 2017. The coracohumeral interval and orientation of the glenoid in patients with arthroscopically diagnosed subscapularis tears (group A, n = 40) were compared with 2 control groups (group B, n = 38 [intact subscapularis with supraspinatus and infraspinatus cuff tears] and group C, n = 39 [intact rotator cuff]). Group A1 (n = 23) consisted of the isolated subscapularis and combined subscapularis + supraspinatus tears, and group A2 (n = 17) all the 3 rotator cuff tears. The measurements were made on preoperative axial magnetic resonance imaging. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the groups. RESULTS: The mean coracohumeral interval was 8.81 ± 2.69 mm in group A and 10.62 ± 2.21 and 10.39 ± 2.59 mm in control groups B and C, respectively; this difference was statistically significant (P = .002 and .01, respectively). The mean glenoid version in patients with subscapularis tears was −3.7°, whereas the mean version in patients with intact cuff was −3.4°, and this difference was not statistically significant (P = .74). The mean glenoid version was −4.69° ± 4.22° in group A1 and −3.28° ± 4.04° in group B, with no statistically significant difference (P = .07). CONCLUSION: The coracohumeral interval was significantly decreased in patients with subscapularis tears. The glenoid was retroverted in the subscapularis group but was not statistically significant. Elsevier 2020-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7738594/ /pubmed/33345230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.006 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Sundararajan, Silvampatti Ramasamy
Joseph, Joseph Babu
Ramakanth, Rajagopalakrishnan
Jha, Amit Kumar
Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears?
title Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears?
title_full Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears?
title_fullStr Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears?
title_full_unstemmed Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears?
title_short Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears?
title_sort do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears?
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33345230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.006
work_keys_str_mv AT sundararajansilvampattiramasamy docoracohumeralintervalandglenoidversionplayaroleinsubscapularistears
AT josephjosephbabu docoracohumeralintervalandglenoidversionplayaroleinsubscapularistears
AT ramakanthrajagopalakrishnan docoracohumeralintervalandglenoidversionplayaroleinsubscapularistears
AT jhaamitkumar docoracohumeralintervalandglenoidversionplayaroleinsubscapularistears
AT rajasekaranshanmuganathan docoracohumeralintervalandglenoidversionplayaroleinsubscapularistears