Cargando…
Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears?
PURPOSE: To study the effect of the coracohumeral interval and orientation of the glenoid for causation of subscapularis tears and literature review for the need of coracoplasty. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery from January 2013 t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33345230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.006 |
_version_ | 1783623151008088064 |
---|---|
author | Sundararajan, Silvampatti Ramasamy Joseph, Joseph Babu Ramakanth, Rajagopalakrishnan Jha, Amit Kumar Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan |
author_facet | Sundararajan, Silvampatti Ramasamy Joseph, Joseph Babu Ramakanth, Rajagopalakrishnan Jha, Amit Kumar Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan |
author_sort | Sundararajan, Silvampatti Ramasamy |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To study the effect of the coracohumeral interval and orientation of the glenoid for causation of subscapularis tears and literature review for the need of coracoplasty. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery from January 2013 to December 2017. The coracohumeral interval and orientation of the glenoid in patients with arthroscopically diagnosed subscapularis tears (group A, n = 40) were compared with 2 control groups (group B, n = 38 [intact subscapularis with supraspinatus and infraspinatus cuff tears] and group C, n = 39 [intact rotator cuff]). Group A1 (n = 23) consisted of the isolated subscapularis and combined subscapularis + supraspinatus tears, and group A2 (n = 17) all the 3 rotator cuff tears. The measurements were made on preoperative axial magnetic resonance imaging. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the groups. RESULTS: The mean coracohumeral interval was 8.81 ± 2.69 mm in group A and 10.62 ± 2.21 and 10.39 ± 2.59 mm in control groups B and C, respectively; this difference was statistically significant (P = .002 and .01, respectively). The mean glenoid version in patients with subscapularis tears was −3.7°, whereas the mean version in patients with intact cuff was −3.4°, and this difference was not statistically significant (P = .74). The mean glenoid version was −4.69° ± 4.22° in group A1 and −3.28° ± 4.04° in group B, with no statistically significant difference (P = .07). CONCLUSION: The coracohumeral interval was significantly decreased in patients with subscapularis tears. The glenoid was retroverted in the subscapularis group but was not statistically significant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7738594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77385942020-12-18 Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears? Sundararajan, Silvampatti Ramasamy Joseph, Joseph Babu Ramakanth, Rajagopalakrishnan Jha, Amit Kumar Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan JSES Int Shoulder PURPOSE: To study the effect of the coracohumeral interval and orientation of the glenoid for causation of subscapularis tears and literature review for the need of coracoplasty. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery from January 2013 to December 2017. The coracohumeral interval and orientation of the glenoid in patients with arthroscopically diagnosed subscapularis tears (group A, n = 40) were compared with 2 control groups (group B, n = 38 [intact subscapularis with supraspinatus and infraspinatus cuff tears] and group C, n = 39 [intact rotator cuff]). Group A1 (n = 23) consisted of the isolated subscapularis and combined subscapularis + supraspinatus tears, and group A2 (n = 17) all the 3 rotator cuff tears. The measurements were made on preoperative axial magnetic resonance imaging. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the groups. RESULTS: The mean coracohumeral interval was 8.81 ± 2.69 mm in group A and 10.62 ± 2.21 and 10.39 ± 2.59 mm in control groups B and C, respectively; this difference was statistically significant (P = .002 and .01, respectively). The mean glenoid version in patients with subscapularis tears was −3.7°, whereas the mean version in patients with intact cuff was −3.4°, and this difference was not statistically significant (P = .74). The mean glenoid version was −4.69° ± 4.22° in group A1 and −3.28° ± 4.04° in group B, with no statistically significant difference (P = .07). CONCLUSION: The coracohumeral interval was significantly decreased in patients with subscapularis tears. The glenoid was retroverted in the subscapularis group but was not statistically significant. Elsevier 2020-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7738594/ /pubmed/33345230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.006 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Shoulder Sundararajan, Silvampatti Ramasamy Joseph, Joseph Babu Ramakanth, Rajagopalakrishnan Jha, Amit Kumar Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears? |
title | Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears? |
title_full | Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears? |
title_fullStr | Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears? |
title_short | Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears? |
title_sort | do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears? |
topic | Shoulder |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33345230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sundararajansilvampattiramasamy docoracohumeralintervalandglenoidversionplayaroleinsubscapularistears AT josephjosephbabu docoracohumeralintervalandglenoidversionplayaroleinsubscapularistears AT ramakanthrajagopalakrishnan docoracohumeralintervalandglenoidversionplayaroleinsubscapularistears AT jhaamitkumar docoracohumeralintervalandglenoidversionplayaroleinsubscapularistears AT rajasekaranshanmuganathan docoracohumeralintervalandglenoidversionplayaroleinsubscapularistears |