Cargando…
Risk-predicted dual nomograms consisting of clinical and ultrasound factors for downgrading BI-RADS category 4a breast lesions - A multiple centre study
Purpose: To develop and to validate a risk-predicted nomogram for downgrading Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4a breast lesions. Patients and Methods: We enrolled 680 patients with breast lesions that were diagnosed as BI-RADS category 4a by conventional ultrasound from D...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391426 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.51302 |
_version_ | 1783623204765433856 |
---|---|
author | Niu, Zihan Tian, Jia-Wei Ran, Hai-Tao Ren, Wei-Dong Chang, Cai Yuan, Jian-Jun Kang, Chun-Song Deng, You-Bin Wang, Hui Luo, Bao-Ming Guo, Sheng-Lan Zhou, Qi Xue, En-Sheng Zhan, Wei-Wei Zhou, Qing Li, Jie Zhou, Ping Zhang, Chun-Quan Chen, Man Gu, Ying Xu, Jin-Feng Chen, Wu Zhang, Yu-Hong Wang, Hong-Qiao Li, Jian-Chu Wang, Hong-Yan Jiang, Yu-Xin |
author_facet | Niu, Zihan Tian, Jia-Wei Ran, Hai-Tao Ren, Wei-Dong Chang, Cai Yuan, Jian-Jun Kang, Chun-Song Deng, You-Bin Wang, Hui Luo, Bao-Ming Guo, Sheng-Lan Zhou, Qi Xue, En-Sheng Zhan, Wei-Wei Zhou, Qing Li, Jie Zhou, Ping Zhang, Chun-Quan Chen, Man Gu, Ying Xu, Jin-Feng Chen, Wu Zhang, Yu-Hong Wang, Hong-Qiao Li, Jian-Chu Wang, Hong-Yan Jiang, Yu-Xin |
author_sort | Niu, Zihan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To develop and to validate a risk-predicted nomogram for downgrading Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4a breast lesions. Patients and Methods: We enrolled 680 patients with breast lesions that were diagnosed as BI-RADS category 4a by conventional ultrasound from December 2018 to June 2019. All 4a lesions were randomly divided into development and validation groups at the ratio of 3:1. In the development group consisting of 499 cases, the multiple clinical and ultrasound predicted factors were extracted, and dual-predicted nomograms were constructed by multivariable logistic regression analysis, named clinical nomogram and ultrasound nomogram, respectively. Patients were twice classified as either “high risk” or “low risk” in the two nomograms. The performance of these dual nomograms was assessed by an independent validation group of 181 cases. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and diagnostic value were calculated to evaluate the applicability of the new model. Results: After multiple logistic regression analysis, the clinical nomogram included 2 predictors: age and the first-degree family members with breast cancer. The area under the curve (AUC) value for the clinical nomogram was 0.661 and 0.712 for the development and validation groups, respectively. The ultrasound nomogram included 3 independent predictors (margins, calcification and strain ratio), and the AUC value in this nomogram was 0.782 and 0.747 in the development and validation groups, respectively. In the development group of 499 patients, approximately 50.90% (254/499) of patients were twice classified “low risk”, with a malignancy rate of 1.18%. In the validation group of 181 patients, approximately 47.51% (86/181) of patients had been twice classified as “low risk”, with a malignancy rate of 1.16%. Conclusions: A dual-predicted nomogram incorporating clinical factors and imaging characteristics is an applicable model for downgrading the low-risk lesions in BI-RADS category 4a and shows good stability and accuracy, which is useful for decreasing the rate of invasive examinations and surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7738830 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77388302021-01-01 Risk-predicted dual nomograms consisting of clinical and ultrasound factors for downgrading BI-RADS category 4a breast lesions - A multiple centre study Niu, Zihan Tian, Jia-Wei Ran, Hai-Tao Ren, Wei-Dong Chang, Cai Yuan, Jian-Jun Kang, Chun-Song Deng, You-Bin Wang, Hui Luo, Bao-Ming Guo, Sheng-Lan Zhou, Qi Xue, En-Sheng Zhan, Wei-Wei Zhou, Qing Li, Jie Zhou, Ping Zhang, Chun-Quan Chen, Man Gu, Ying Xu, Jin-Feng Chen, Wu Zhang, Yu-Hong Wang, Hong-Qiao Li, Jian-Chu Wang, Hong-Yan Jiang, Yu-Xin J Cancer Research Paper Purpose: To develop and to validate a risk-predicted nomogram for downgrading Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4a breast lesions. Patients and Methods: We enrolled 680 patients with breast lesions that were diagnosed as BI-RADS category 4a by conventional ultrasound from December 2018 to June 2019. All 4a lesions were randomly divided into development and validation groups at the ratio of 3:1. In the development group consisting of 499 cases, the multiple clinical and ultrasound predicted factors were extracted, and dual-predicted nomograms were constructed by multivariable logistic regression analysis, named clinical nomogram and ultrasound nomogram, respectively. Patients were twice classified as either “high risk” or “low risk” in the two nomograms. The performance of these dual nomograms was assessed by an independent validation group of 181 cases. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and diagnostic value were calculated to evaluate the applicability of the new model. Results: After multiple logistic regression analysis, the clinical nomogram included 2 predictors: age and the first-degree family members with breast cancer. The area under the curve (AUC) value for the clinical nomogram was 0.661 and 0.712 for the development and validation groups, respectively. The ultrasound nomogram included 3 independent predictors (margins, calcification and strain ratio), and the AUC value in this nomogram was 0.782 and 0.747 in the development and validation groups, respectively. In the development group of 499 patients, approximately 50.90% (254/499) of patients were twice classified “low risk”, with a malignancy rate of 1.18%. In the validation group of 181 patients, approximately 47.51% (86/181) of patients had been twice classified as “low risk”, with a malignancy rate of 1.16%. Conclusions: A dual-predicted nomogram incorporating clinical factors and imaging characteristics is an applicable model for downgrading the low-risk lesions in BI-RADS category 4a and shows good stability and accuracy, which is useful for decreasing the rate of invasive examinations and surgery. Ivyspring International Publisher 2021-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7738830/ /pubmed/33391426 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.51302 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Niu, Zihan Tian, Jia-Wei Ran, Hai-Tao Ren, Wei-Dong Chang, Cai Yuan, Jian-Jun Kang, Chun-Song Deng, You-Bin Wang, Hui Luo, Bao-Ming Guo, Sheng-Lan Zhou, Qi Xue, En-Sheng Zhan, Wei-Wei Zhou, Qing Li, Jie Zhou, Ping Zhang, Chun-Quan Chen, Man Gu, Ying Xu, Jin-Feng Chen, Wu Zhang, Yu-Hong Wang, Hong-Qiao Li, Jian-Chu Wang, Hong-Yan Jiang, Yu-Xin Risk-predicted dual nomograms consisting of clinical and ultrasound factors for downgrading BI-RADS category 4a breast lesions - A multiple centre study |
title | Risk-predicted dual nomograms consisting of clinical and ultrasound factors for downgrading BI-RADS category 4a breast lesions - A multiple centre study |
title_full | Risk-predicted dual nomograms consisting of clinical and ultrasound factors for downgrading BI-RADS category 4a breast lesions - A multiple centre study |
title_fullStr | Risk-predicted dual nomograms consisting of clinical and ultrasound factors for downgrading BI-RADS category 4a breast lesions - A multiple centre study |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk-predicted dual nomograms consisting of clinical and ultrasound factors for downgrading BI-RADS category 4a breast lesions - A multiple centre study |
title_short | Risk-predicted dual nomograms consisting of clinical and ultrasound factors for downgrading BI-RADS category 4a breast lesions - A multiple centre study |
title_sort | risk-predicted dual nomograms consisting of clinical and ultrasound factors for downgrading bi-rads category 4a breast lesions - a multiple centre study |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391426 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.51302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niuzihan riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT tianjiawei riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT ranhaitao riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT renweidong riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT changcai riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT yuanjianjun riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT kangchunsong riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT dengyoubin riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT wanghui riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT luobaoming riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT guoshenglan riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT zhouqi riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT xueensheng riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT zhanweiwei riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT zhouqing riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT lijie riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT zhouping riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT zhangchunquan riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT chenman riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT guying riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT xujinfeng riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT chenwu riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT zhangyuhong riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT wanghongqiao riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT lijianchu riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT wanghongyan riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy AT jiangyuxin riskpredicteddualnomogramsconsistingofclinicalandultrasoundfactorsfordowngradingbiradscategory4abreastlesionsamultiplecentrestudy |