Cargando…

CXCR4 PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma using [(68)Ga]Pentixafor: comparison with [(18)F]FDG-PET

For PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), [(18)F]FDG (2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose) is the currently recommended radiotracer, although uptake is variable and bone marrow evaluation is limited. In this prospective study, we evaluated the novel CXCR4 (G-protein-coupled C-X-C chemokine recept...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayerhoefer, Marius E., Raderer, Markus, Lamm, Wolfgang, Pichler, Verena, Pfaff, Sarah, Weber, Michael, Kiesewetter, Barbara, Hacker, Markus, Kazianka, Lukas, Staber, Philipp B., Wester, Hans-Juergen, Rohrbeck, Johannes, Simonitsch-Klupp, Ingrid, Haug, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391493
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.48620
_version_ 1783623214558085120
author Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
Raderer, Markus
Lamm, Wolfgang
Pichler, Verena
Pfaff, Sarah
Weber, Michael
Kiesewetter, Barbara
Hacker, Markus
Kazianka, Lukas
Staber, Philipp B.
Wester, Hans-Juergen
Rohrbeck, Johannes
Simonitsch-Klupp, Ingrid
Haug, Alexander
author_facet Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
Raderer, Markus
Lamm, Wolfgang
Pichler, Verena
Pfaff, Sarah
Weber, Michael
Kiesewetter, Barbara
Hacker, Markus
Kazianka, Lukas
Staber, Philipp B.
Wester, Hans-Juergen
Rohrbeck, Johannes
Simonitsch-Klupp, Ingrid
Haug, Alexander
author_sort Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
collection PubMed
description For PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), [(18)F]FDG (2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose) is the currently recommended radiotracer, although uptake is variable and bone marrow evaluation is limited. In this prospective study, we evaluated the novel CXCR4 (G-protein-coupled C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4) tracer [(68)Ga]Pentixafor in MCL patients, and compared it to [(18)F]FDG. Methods: MCL patients underwent [(68)Ga]Pentixafor-PET/MRI, and, if required for routine purposes, also [(18)F]FDG-PET/MRI, before treatment. PET was evaluated separately for 23 anatomic regions (12 lymph node stations and 11 organs/tissues), using MRI as the main reference standard. Standardized uptake values (SUV(max) and SUV(mean)) and tumor-to-background ratios (TBR(blood) and TBR(liver)) were calculated. General Estimation Equations (GEE) were used to compare [(68)Ga]Pentixafor-PET and [(18)F]FDG-PET sensitivities and positive predictive values (PPV). For bone marrow involvement, where biopsy served as the main reference standard, and splenic involvement, receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the optimal SUV and TBR cut-off values, and areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: Twenty-two MCL patients were included. [(68)Ga]Pentixafor-PET sensitivity (100%) was significantly higher than for [(18)F]FDG-PET (75.2%) (P<0.001), and PPV was slightly, but not significantly lower (94.0%.vs. 96.5%; P=0.21). SUVs and TBRs were significantly higher for [(68)Ga]Pentixafor-PET than for [(18)F]FDG-PET (P<0.001 in all cases); the greatest difference was observed for mean TBR(blood), with 4.9 for [(68)Ga]Pentixafor-PET and 2.0 for [(18)F]FDG-PET. For bone marrow involvement, [(68)Ga]Pentixafor-PET SUV(mean) showed an AUC of 0.92; and for splenic involvement, TBR(blood) showed an AUC of 0.81. Conclusion: [(68)Ga]Pentixafor-PET may become an alternative to [(18)F]FDG-PET in MCL patients, showing clearly higher detection rates and better tumor-to-background contrast.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7738870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77388702021-01-01 CXCR4 PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma using [(68)Ga]Pentixafor: comparison with [(18)F]FDG-PET Mayerhoefer, Marius E. Raderer, Markus Lamm, Wolfgang Pichler, Verena Pfaff, Sarah Weber, Michael Kiesewetter, Barbara Hacker, Markus Kazianka, Lukas Staber, Philipp B. Wester, Hans-Juergen Rohrbeck, Johannes Simonitsch-Klupp, Ingrid Haug, Alexander Theranostics Research Paper For PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), [(18)F]FDG (2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose) is the currently recommended radiotracer, although uptake is variable and bone marrow evaluation is limited. In this prospective study, we evaluated the novel CXCR4 (G-protein-coupled C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4) tracer [(68)Ga]Pentixafor in MCL patients, and compared it to [(18)F]FDG. Methods: MCL patients underwent [(68)Ga]Pentixafor-PET/MRI, and, if required for routine purposes, also [(18)F]FDG-PET/MRI, before treatment. PET was evaluated separately for 23 anatomic regions (12 lymph node stations and 11 organs/tissues), using MRI as the main reference standard. Standardized uptake values (SUV(max) and SUV(mean)) and tumor-to-background ratios (TBR(blood) and TBR(liver)) were calculated. General Estimation Equations (GEE) were used to compare [(68)Ga]Pentixafor-PET and [(18)F]FDG-PET sensitivities and positive predictive values (PPV). For bone marrow involvement, where biopsy served as the main reference standard, and splenic involvement, receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the optimal SUV and TBR cut-off values, and areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: Twenty-two MCL patients were included. [(68)Ga]Pentixafor-PET sensitivity (100%) was significantly higher than for [(18)F]FDG-PET (75.2%) (P<0.001), and PPV was slightly, but not significantly lower (94.0%.vs. 96.5%; P=0.21). SUVs and TBRs were significantly higher for [(68)Ga]Pentixafor-PET than for [(18)F]FDG-PET (P<0.001 in all cases); the greatest difference was observed for mean TBR(blood), with 4.9 for [(68)Ga]Pentixafor-PET and 2.0 for [(18)F]FDG-PET. For bone marrow involvement, [(68)Ga]Pentixafor-PET SUV(mean) showed an AUC of 0.92; and for splenic involvement, TBR(blood) showed an AUC of 0.81. Conclusion: [(68)Ga]Pentixafor-PET may become an alternative to [(18)F]FDG-PET in MCL patients, showing clearly higher detection rates and better tumor-to-background contrast. Ivyspring International Publisher 2021-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7738870/ /pubmed/33391493 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.48620 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
Raderer, Markus
Lamm, Wolfgang
Pichler, Verena
Pfaff, Sarah
Weber, Michael
Kiesewetter, Barbara
Hacker, Markus
Kazianka, Lukas
Staber, Philipp B.
Wester, Hans-Juergen
Rohrbeck, Johannes
Simonitsch-Klupp, Ingrid
Haug, Alexander
CXCR4 PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma using [(68)Ga]Pentixafor: comparison with [(18)F]FDG-PET
title CXCR4 PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma using [(68)Ga]Pentixafor: comparison with [(18)F]FDG-PET
title_full CXCR4 PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma using [(68)Ga]Pentixafor: comparison with [(18)F]FDG-PET
title_fullStr CXCR4 PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma using [(68)Ga]Pentixafor: comparison with [(18)F]FDG-PET
title_full_unstemmed CXCR4 PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma using [(68)Ga]Pentixafor: comparison with [(18)F]FDG-PET
title_short CXCR4 PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma using [(68)Ga]Pentixafor: comparison with [(18)F]FDG-PET
title_sort cxcr4 pet imaging of mantle cell lymphoma using [(68)ga]pentixafor: comparison with [(18)f]fdg-pet
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391493
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.48620
work_keys_str_mv AT mayerhoefermariuse cxcr4petimagingofmantlecelllymphomausing68gapentixaforcomparisonwith18ffdgpet
AT raderermarkus cxcr4petimagingofmantlecelllymphomausing68gapentixaforcomparisonwith18ffdgpet
AT lammwolfgang cxcr4petimagingofmantlecelllymphomausing68gapentixaforcomparisonwith18ffdgpet
AT pichlerverena cxcr4petimagingofmantlecelllymphomausing68gapentixaforcomparisonwith18ffdgpet
AT pfaffsarah cxcr4petimagingofmantlecelllymphomausing68gapentixaforcomparisonwith18ffdgpet
AT webermichael cxcr4petimagingofmantlecelllymphomausing68gapentixaforcomparisonwith18ffdgpet
AT kiesewetterbarbara cxcr4petimagingofmantlecelllymphomausing68gapentixaforcomparisonwith18ffdgpet
AT hackermarkus cxcr4petimagingofmantlecelllymphomausing68gapentixaforcomparisonwith18ffdgpet
AT kaziankalukas cxcr4petimagingofmantlecelllymphomausing68gapentixaforcomparisonwith18ffdgpet
AT staberphilippb cxcr4petimagingofmantlecelllymphomausing68gapentixaforcomparisonwith18ffdgpet
AT westerhansjuergen cxcr4petimagingofmantlecelllymphomausing68gapentixaforcomparisonwith18ffdgpet
AT rohrbeckjohannes cxcr4petimagingofmantlecelllymphomausing68gapentixaforcomparisonwith18ffdgpet
AT simonitschkluppingrid cxcr4petimagingofmantlecelllymphomausing68gapentixaforcomparisonwith18ffdgpet
AT haugalexander cxcr4petimagingofmantlecelllymphomausing68gapentixaforcomparisonwith18ffdgpet