Cargando…

Differences Related to Cancer Screening by Minority and Rural/Urban Status in the Deep South: Population-based Survey Results

Objective: Cancer mortality in the U.S. Deep South exceeds national levels. A cross-sectional survey was undertaken across Alabama to discern cancer beliefs and screening practices, and compare data from racial/ethnic minority versus majority and rural versus urban respondents. Methods: Using popula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel, Casey, Aly, Salma, Bae, Sejong, Scarinci, Isabel, Hardy, Claudia, Fouad, Mona, Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391444
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.49676
_version_ 1783623236845568000
author Daniel, Casey
Aly, Salma
Bae, Sejong
Scarinci, Isabel
Hardy, Claudia
Fouad, Mona
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
author_facet Daniel, Casey
Aly, Salma
Bae, Sejong
Scarinci, Isabel
Hardy, Claudia
Fouad, Mona
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
author_sort Daniel, Casey
collection PubMed
description Objective: Cancer mortality in the U.S. Deep South exceeds national levels. A cross-sectional survey was undertaken across Alabama to discern cancer beliefs and screening practices, and compare data from racial/ethnic minority versus majority and rural versus urban respondents. Methods: Using population-based methods, we approached 5,633 Alabamians (ages 50-80) to complete a 58-item survey (administered in-person, via telephone, or the web). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize findings; two-tailed, chi-square and t-tests (α<0.05) were used to compare minority-majority and rural-urban subgroups. Results: The response rate was 15.2%; respondents identified as minority (n=356) or majority (n=486), and rural (n=671) or urban (n=183). Mean (SD) age was 63.7 (10.2) and >90% indicated stable housing, and healthcare coverage and access. Rural and minority versus urban and majority respondents were significantly more likely to have lower education, employment, and income, respectively. Most respondents equated cancer as a “death sentence” and were unable to identify the age at which cancer screening should begin. Few rural-urban subgroup differences were noted, though significant differences were observed between minority versus majority subgroups for mammography (36.7% versus 49.6%, p<.001) and colorectal cancer screening (34.5% vs. 47.9%, p<0.001). Furthermore, while minorities were significantly more likely to report ever having a colonoscopy (82.1% versus 76.1%, p=0.041) and to have received fecal occult blood testing within the past year (17.2% versus 12.2%, p=0.046), routine adherence to screening was <20% across all subgroups. Discussion: Cancer early detection education is needed across Alabama to improve cancer screening, and particularly needed among racial/ethnic minorities to raise cancer awareness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7738985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77389852021-01-01 Differences Related to Cancer Screening by Minority and Rural/Urban Status in the Deep South: Population-based Survey Results Daniel, Casey Aly, Salma Bae, Sejong Scarinci, Isabel Hardy, Claudia Fouad, Mona Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy J Cancer Research Paper Objective: Cancer mortality in the U.S. Deep South exceeds national levels. A cross-sectional survey was undertaken across Alabama to discern cancer beliefs and screening practices, and compare data from racial/ethnic minority versus majority and rural versus urban respondents. Methods: Using population-based methods, we approached 5,633 Alabamians (ages 50-80) to complete a 58-item survey (administered in-person, via telephone, or the web). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize findings; two-tailed, chi-square and t-tests (α<0.05) were used to compare minority-majority and rural-urban subgroups. Results: The response rate was 15.2%; respondents identified as minority (n=356) or majority (n=486), and rural (n=671) or urban (n=183). Mean (SD) age was 63.7 (10.2) and >90% indicated stable housing, and healthcare coverage and access. Rural and minority versus urban and majority respondents were significantly more likely to have lower education, employment, and income, respectively. Most respondents equated cancer as a “death sentence” and were unable to identify the age at which cancer screening should begin. Few rural-urban subgroup differences were noted, though significant differences were observed between minority versus majority subgroups for mammography (36.7% versus 49.6%, p<.001) and colorectal cancer screening (34.5% vs. 47.9%, p<0.001). Furthermore, while minorities were significantly more likely to report ever having a colonoscopy (82.1% versus 76.1%, p=0.041) and to have received fecal occult blood testing within the past year (17.2% versus 12.2%, p=0.046), routine adherence to screening was <20% across all subgroups. Discussion: Cancer early detection education is needed across Alabama to improve cancer screening, and particularly needed among racial/ethnic minorities to raise cancer awareness. Ivyspring International Publisher 2021-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7738985/ /pubmed/33391444 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.49676 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Daniel, Casey
Aly, Salma
Bae, Sejong
Scarinci, Isabel
Hardy, Claudia
Fouad, Mona
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
Differences Related to Cancer Screening by Minority and Rural/Urban Status in the Deep South: Population-based Survey Results
title Differences Related to Cancer Screening by Minority and Rural/Urban Status in the Deep South: Population-based Survey Results
title_full Differences Related to Cancer Screening by Minority and Rural/Urban Status in the Deep South: Population-based Survey Results
title_fullStr Differences Related to Cancer Screening by Minority and Rural/Urban Status in the Deep South: Population-based Survey Results
title_full_unstemmed Differences Related to Cancer Screening by Minority and Rural/Urban Status in the Deep South: Population-based Survey Results
title_short Differences Related to Cancer Screening by Minority and Rural/Urban Status in the Deep South: Population-based Survey Results
title_sort differences related to cancer screening by minority and rural/urban status in the deep south: population-based survey results
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391444
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.49676
work_keys_str_mv AT danielcasey differencesrelatedtocancerscreeningbyminorityandruralurbanstatusinthedeepsouthpopulationbasedsurveyresults
AT alysalma differencesrelatedtocancerscreeningbyminorityandruralurbanstatusinthedeepsouthpopulationbasedsurveyresults
AT baesejong differencesrelatedtocancerscreeningbyminorityandruralurbanstatusinthedeepsouthpopulationbasedsurveyresults
AT scarinciisabel differencesrelatedtocancerscreeningbyminorityandruralurbanstatusinthedeepsouthpopulationbasedsurveyresults
AT hardyclaudia differencesrelatedtocancerscreeningbyminorityandruralurbanstatusinthedeepsouthpopulationbasedsurveyresults
AT fouadmona differencesrelatedtocancerscreeningbyminorityandruralurbanstatusinthedeepsouthpopulationbasedsurveyresults
AT demarkwahnefriedwendy differencesrelatedtocancerscreeningbyminorityandruralurbanstatusinthedeepsouthpopulationbasedsurveyresults