Cargando…

“Not a Woman-Question, But a Power-Question”: A Qualitative Study of Third Parties on Psychological Violence in Academic Medicine

BACKGROUND: Psychological violence is a persistent issue in academic medicine and affects the health and safety of health care workers. This violence is also debated as part of medical culture. Third parties, persons learning about violations after it happened, may provide an understanding of the in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siller, Dr. Heidi, Beck-Rabanser, Claudia, Hochleitner, Prof. Dr. Margarethe, Exenberger, Dr. Silvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32812842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2165079920938001
_version_ 1783623263598936064
author Siller, Dr. Heidi
Beck-Rabanser, Claudia
Hochleitner, Prof. Dr. Margarethe
Exenberger, Dr. Silvia
author_facet Siller, Dr. Heidi
Beck-Rabanser, Claudia
Hochleitner, Prof. Dr. Margarethe
Exenberger, Dr. Silvia
author_sort Siller, Dr. Heidi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Psychological violence is a persistent issue in academic medicine and affects the health and safety of health care workers. This violence is also debated as part of medical culture. Third parties, persons learning about violations after it happened, may provide an understanding of the interplay between gender and psychological violence. Perspectives on research on psychological violence in academic medicine are currently lacking. METHODS: In this qualitative exploratory study, interviews were conducted with women from a working group on equal treatment at one medical university in Austria. This group monitors discrimination and harassment and consists of medical doctors, natural scientists, administrative staff, and students. To recruit participants, an email invitation was sent to members of the working group. Of 20 eligible persons, 12 women participated. After written consent from participants, individual interviews were conducted face-to-face, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed with grounded theory. FINDINGS: Participants described a firm organizational culture with persistent, historically grown gendered structures. Potential threat of psychological violence affected mostly “weaker,” less powerful persons, and often women. Descriptions of violence indicated harm to those affected, but intent to harm was doubted. Interventions strengthened the individual, but some participants demanded collective responsibility. CONCLUSION/APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: Few descriptions could be classified as psychological violence. Findings indicated a need to change organizational cultures where lower positions pose a potential threat to experiencing harm. Occupational health practice should include training in sensitization to psychological violence, protection of those targeted, deconstructing power accumulation, and promoting diversity in career patterns and working styles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7739110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77391102021-01-08 “Not a Woman-Question, But a Power-Question”: A Qualitative Study of Third Parties on Psychological Violence in Academic Medicine Siller, Dr. Heidi Beck-Rabanser, Claudia Hochleitner, Prof. Dr. Margarethe Exenberger, Dr. Silvia Workplace Health Saf Continuing Education BACKGROUND: Psychological violence is a persistent issue in academic medicine and affects the health and safety of health care workers. This violence is also debated as part of medical culture. Third parties, persons learning about violations after it happened, may provide an understanding of the interplay between gender and psychological violence. Perspectives on research on psychological violence in academic medicine are currently lacking. METHODS: In this qualitative exploratory study, interviews were conducted with women from a working group on equal treatment at one medical university in Austria. This group monitors discrimination and harassment and consists of medical doctors, natural scientists, administrative staff, and students. To recruit participants, an email invitation was sent to members of the working group. Of 20 eligible persons, 12 women participated. After written consent from participants, individual interviews were conducted face-to-face, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed with grounded theory. FINDINGS: Participants described a firm organizational culture with persistent, historically grown gendered structures. Potential threat of psychological violence affected mostly “weaker,” less powerful persons, and often women. Descriptions of violence indicated harm to those affected, but intent to harm was doubted. Interventions strengthened the individual, but some participants demanded collective responsibility. CONCLUSION/APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: Few descriptions could be classified as psychological violence. Findings indicated a need to change organizational cultures where lower positions pose a potential threat to experiencing harm. Occupational health practice should include training in sensitization to psychological violence, protection of those targeted, deconstructing power accumulation, and promoting diversity in career patterns and working styles. SAGE Publications 2020-08-19 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7739110/ /pubmed/32812842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2165079920938001 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Continuing Education
Siller, Dr. Heidi
Beck-Rabanser, Claudia
Hochleitner, Prof. Dr. Margarethe
Exenberger, Dr. Silvia
“Not a Woman-Question, But a Power-Question”: A Qualitative Study of Third Parties on Psychological Violence in Academic Medicine
title “Not a Woman-Question, But a Power-Question”: A Qualitative Study of Third Parties on Psychological Violence in Academic Medicine
title_full “Not a Woman-Question, But a Power-Question”: A Qualitative Study of Third Parties on Psychological Violence in Academic Medicine
title_fullStr “Not a Woman-Question, But a Power-Question”: A Qualitative Study of Third Parties on Psychological Violence in Academic Medicine
title_full_unstemmed “Not a Woman-Question, But a Power-Question”: A Qualitative Study of Third Parties on Psychological Violence in Academic Medicine
title_short “Not a Woman-Question, But a Power-Question”: A Qualitative Study of Third Parties on Psychological Violence in Academic Medicine
title_sort “not a woman-question, but a power-question”: a qualitative study of third parties on psychological violence in academic medicine
topic Continuing Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7739110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32812842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2165079920938001
work_keys_str_mv AT sillerdrheidi notawomanquestionbutapowerquestionaqualitativestudyofthirdpartiesonpsychologicalviolenceinacademicmedicine
AT beckrabanserclaudia notawomanquestionbutapowerquestionaqualitativestudyofthirdpartiesonpsychologicalviolenceinacademicmedicine
AT hochleitnerprofdrmargarethe notawomanquestionbutapowerquestionaqualitativestudyofthirdpartiesonpsychologicalviolenceinacademicmedicine
AT exenbergerdrsilvia notawomanquestionbutapowerquestionaqualitativestudyofthirdpartiesonpsychologicalviolenceinacademicmedicine